Sibawayhi
London and New York: I.B. Tauris and Oxford University Press India, in association with the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies, 2004. 159 pages. In the “Foreword,” Michael Carter states that his book is aimed at the general reader who is interested in the history of Arabic grammar and, in particular...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
International Institute of Islamic Thought
2006
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/93080d2e46204379a19286eca937d80b |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | London and New York: I.B. Tauris and Oxford University Press India, in
association with the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies, 2004. 159 pages.
In the “Foreword,” Michael Carter states that his book is aimed at the general
reader who is interested in the history of Arabic grammar and, in particular,
in the achievement of Sibawayhi, the discipline’s architect and originator. This much-needed and long-awaited effort is a welcome addition to the
field of Arabic grammatical theory, for it contextualizes Sibawayhi’s grammatical
ideas, as set forth in his Al-Kitab, by giving a short account of his
background and life (p. vii). The reader, whether advanced or novice, will
appreciate how accessible the material has been made. To be sure, reducing
Sibawayhi’s complex and profound observations to 145 pages runs the risk
of making it even harder to understand. But the author avoids such pitfalls
with ease and grace. In fact, a knowledge of Arabic is not essential; but, as
the author says, “given the nature of the topic it will certainly be useful” (p.
vii). All examples are transliterated and translated, and technical terms and
basic concepts are explained as often as possible.
Despite the complex subject matter, Carter does a brilliant job describing
the Kitab’s place within the Arabo-Islamic system and the historical context
in which it was written. It is useful to spend some time on Sibawayhi’s
life, even though little is actually known about it, and so chapter 1, “Sibawayhi
the Person,” explores his importance through portraits in biographies
as well as from the contents of his own work. It has been convincingly
argued that the earliest form of Sibawayhi’s name (Amr ibn `Uthman Sibawayhi)
is probably authentic (p. 9). That Sibawayhi was by origin a Persian
who ended up in Basra seems to be beyond contention, although neither the
date nor the place of his birth can be confirmed. All biographies agree that
he came to Basra to study religious law, either Hadith (traditions of the
Prophet) or basic principles of fiqh (jurisprudence), which were just beginning
to take form. The details of his death are just as vague as those of his
birth and personal history. Carter presents his readers with a short account of
this problem, with which even the classical biographers had to wrestle (see
pp. 15-16) ...
|
|---|