From the History of the Journal “Severny Vestnik”. Commentary to the Commentary

The history of literary associations, including the history of any journal, is primarily the history of people's relationships with each other. In such a history, personal likes and dislikes play the most essential role. This law of personal sympathies and antipathies manifests itself very expr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Mikhail V. Stroganov
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	Russian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature 2021
Materias:	“severny vestnik” literary life a.l. volynsky l.ya. gurevich n.k. mikhaylovsky d.s. merezhkovsky z.n. gippius Literature (General) PN1-6790 Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/933eb1a2992e459194f06476a857d1f0
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:933eb1a2992e459194f06476a857d1f0
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:933eb1a2992e459194f06476a857d1f02021-11-24T16:07:03ZFrom the History of the Journal “Severny Vestnik”. Commentary to the Commentary10.22455/2541-8297-2021-21-261-2772541-82972542-2421https://doaj.org/article/933eb1a2992e459194f06476a857d1f02021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://litfact.ru/images/2021-21/10_Stroganov.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2541-8297https://doaj.org/toc/2542-2421The history of literary associations, including the history of any journal, is primarily the history of people's relationships with each other. In such a history, personal likes and dislikes play the most essential role. This law of personal sympathies and antipathies manifests itself very expressively in a rather short history of the journal “Severny Vestnik”, published by L.Ya. Gurevich (1891–1898). The article offers significant additions to comments to published texts on the history of the journal. A.L. Volynsky and N.K. Mikhailovsky showed equal harshness and indelicacy in their polemics, but their contemporaries almost unanimously sided with Mikhailovsky as an older and deserved writer. Volynsky acquired a reputation as an unscrupulous person and gossip begins to gather around his name. Volynsky demonstrated unacceptable immodesty towards D.S. Merezhkovsky and Z.N. Gippius and allowed himself to use of someone else's material, bordering on plagiarism. But most importantly, in the plot of the book about Leonardo da Vinci, he depicted his personal relationship with Merezhkovsky and Gippius and his interpretation of the relationship between them. In addition, he expelled Merezhkovsky from the journal “Severny Vestnik”, which closed for him the opportunity to publish his novel about Leonardo da Vinci.Mikhail V. StroganovRussian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literaturearticle“severny vestnik”literary lifea.l. volynskyl.ya. gurevichn.k. mikhaylovskyd.s. merezhkovskyz.n. gippiusLiterature (General)PN1-6790Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665ENRUЛитературный факт, Iss 3 (21), Pp 261-277 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	“severny vestnik” literary life a.l. volynsky l.ya. gurevich n.k. mikhaylovsky d.s. merezhkovsky z.n. gippius Literature (General) PN1-6790 Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
spellingShingle	“severny vestnik” literary life a.l. volynsky l.ya. gurevich n.k. mikhaylovsky d.s. merezhkovsky z.n. gippius Literature (General) PN1-6790 Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 Mikhail V. Stroganov From the History of the Journal “Severny Vestnik”. Commentary to the Commentary
description	The history of literary associations, including the history of any journal, is primarily the history of people's relationships with each other. In such a history, personal likes and dislikes play the most essential role. This law of personal sympathies and antipathies manifests itself very expressively in a rather short history of the journal “Severny Vestnik”, published by L.Ya. Gurevich (1891–1898). The article offers significant additions to comments to published texts on the history of the journal. A.L. Volynsky and N.K. Mikhailovsky showed equal harshness and indelicacy in their polemics, but their contemporaries almost unanimously sided with Mikhailovsky as an older and deserved writer. Volynsky acquired a reputation as an unscrupulous person and gossip begins to gather around his name. Volynsky demonstrated unacceptable immodesty towards D.S. Merezhkovsky and Z.N. Gippius and allowed himself to use of someone else's material, bordering on plagiarism. But most importantly, in the plot of the book about Leonardo da Vinci, he depicted his personal relationship with Merezhkovsky and Gippius and his interpretation of the relationship between them. In addition, he expelled Merezhkovsky from the journal “Severny Vestnik”, which closed for him the opportunity to publish his novel about Leonardo da Vinci.
format	article
author	Mikhail V. Stroganov
author_facet	Mikhail V. Stroganov
author_sort	Mikhail V. Stroganov
title	From the History of the Journal “Severny Vestnik”. Commentary to the Commentary
title_short	From the History of the Journal “Severny Vestnik”. Commentary to the Commentary
title_full	From the History of the Journal “Severny Vestnik”. Commentary to the Commentary
title_fullStr	From the History of the Journal “Severny Vestnik”. Commentary to the Commentary
title_full_unstemmed	From the History of the Journal “Severny Vestnik”. Commentary to the Commentary
title_sort	from the history of the journal “severny vestnik”. commentary to the commentary
publisher	Russian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/933eb1a2992e459194f06476a857d1f0
work_keys_str_mv	AT mikhailvstroganov fromthehistoryofthejournalsevernyvestnikcommentarytothecommentary
_version_	1718414825226240000

From the History of the Journal “Severny Vestnik”. Commentary to the Commentary

Ejemplares similares