Optical bench performance of AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR®, AT LISA® tri, and FineVision® intraocular lenses

Optical bench performance of AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR®, AT LISA® tri, and FineVision® intraocular lenses

Daniel Carson,1 Warren E Hill,2 Xin Hong,1 Mutlu Karakelle1 1Alcon Research, Ltd., Fort Worth, TX, USA; 2East Valley Ophthalmology, Mesa, AZ, USA Purpose: To compare the resolution and optical quality of the ReSTOR® +3.0 D and ReSTOR +2.5 D multifocal intraocular...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carson D, Hill WE, Hong X, Karakelle M
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9345596e715940c79a8ca93b9f9ff983
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9345596e715940c79a8ca93b9f9ff983
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9345596e715940c79a8ca93b9f9ff9832021-12-02T02:55:29ZOptical bench performance of AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR®, AT LISA® tri, and FineVision® intraocular lenses1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/9345596e715940c79a8ca93b9f9ff9832014-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/optical-bench-performance-of-acrysofreg-iq-restorreg-at-lisareg-tri-an-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483 Daniel Carson,1 Warren E Hill,2 Xin Hong,1 Mutlu Karakelle1 1Alcon Research, Ltd., Fort Worth, TX, USA; 2East Valley Ophthalmology, Mesa, AZ, USA Purpose: To compare the resolution and optical quality of the ReSTOR® +3.0 D and ReSTOR +2.5 D multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) with the AT LISA® tri and FineVision® trifocal IOLs.Methods: Resolution, image quality, and photic phenomena were evaluated in the AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR +3.0 D and +2.5 D multifocal IOLs and compared with the AT LISA tri 839MP and FineVision Micro F12 trifocal IOLs, using a Badal optometer and a Snellen visual acuity chart. Simulated headlight images were obtained using a modulation transfer function (MTF) bench and a 50 µm pinhole target. MTF values, using vertical and horizontal slits, were determined at far, intermediate, and near distances. Results: Resolution at 20/40 Snellen visual acuity equivalence was attainable over nearly the entire viewing distance range with the AT LISA tri and FineVision IOLs, but background shadows were more prominent with the AT LISA tri and FineVision IOLs than with the ReSTOR IOLs. Distance MTF peaks at 20/20 Snellen–equivalent spatial frequency were greatest for ReSTOR +2.5 D and ReSTOR +3.0 D IOLs. The near MTF peak occurred at 53 cm with ReSTOR +2.5 D and had a 20/20 Snellen–equivalent value that was lower than the near peaks of the other models but higher than the intermediate foci of the trifocal IOLs. Conclusion: AT LISA tri and FineVision trifocal IOLs achieved a useful third focus for intermediate vision but were associated with increased background halos and reduced distance visual quality compared with ReSTOR +2.5 D and +3.0 D multifocal IOLs. Keywords: multifocal, trifocal, modulation transfer function, Badal image, visual acuity, resolutionCarson DHill WEHong XKarakelle MDove Medical PressarticleOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol 2014, Iss default, Pp 2105-2113 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Carson D
Hill WE
Hong X
Karakelle M
Optical bench performance of AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR®, AT LISA® tri, and FineVision® intraocular lenses
description Daniel Carson,1 Warren E Hill,2 Xin Hong,1 Mutlu Karakelle1 1Alcon Research, Ltd., Fort Worth, TX, USA; 2East Valley Ophthalmology, Mesa, AZ, USA Purpose: To compare the resolution and optical quality of the ReSTOR® +3.0 D and ReSTOR +2.5 D multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) with the AT LISA® tri and FineVision® trifocal IOLs.Methods: Resolution, image quality, and photic phenomena were evaluated in the AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR +3.0 D and +2.5 D multifocal IOLs and compared with the AT LISA tri 839MP and FineVision Micro F12 trifocal IOLs, using a Badal optometer and a Snellen visual acuity chart. Simulated headlight images were obtained using a modulation transfer function (MTF) bench and a 50 µm pinhole target. MTF values, using vertical and horizontal slits, were determined at far, intermediate, and near distances. Results: Resolution at 20/40 Snellen visual acuity equivalence was attainable over nearly the entire viewing distance range with the AT LISA tri and FineVision IOLs, but background shadows were more prominent with the AT LISA tri and FineVision IOLs than with the ReSTOR IOLs. Distance MTF peaks at 20/20 Snellen–equivalent spatial frequency were greatest for ReSTOR +2.5 D and ReSTOR +3.0 D IOLs. The near MTF peak occurred at 53 cm with ReSTOR +2.5 D and had a 20/20 Snellen–equivalent value that was lower than the near peaks of the other models but higher than the intermediate foci of the trifocal IOLs. Conclusion: AT LISA tri and FineVision trifocal IOLs achieved a useful third focus for intermediate vision but were associated with increased background halos and reduced distance visual quality compared with ReSTOR +2.5 D and +3.0 D multifocal IOLs. Keywords: multifocal, trifocal, modulation transfer function, Badal image, visual acuity, resolution
format article
author Carson D
Hill WE
Hong X
Karakelle M
author_facet Carson D
Hill WE
Hong X
Karakelle M
author_sort Carson D
title Optical bench performance of AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR®, AT LISA® tri, and FineVision® intraocular lenses
title_short Optical bench performance of AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR®, AT LISA® tri, and FineVision® intraocular lenses
title_full Optical bench performance of AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR®, AT LISA® tri, and FineVision® intraocular lenses
title_fullStr Optical bench performance of AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR®, AT LISA® tri, and FineVision® intraocular lenses
title_full_unstemmed Optical bench performance of AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR®, AT LISA® tri, and FineVision® intraocular lenses
title_sort optical bench performance of acrysof® iq restor®, at lisa® tri, and finevision® intraocular lenses
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/9345596e715940c79a8ca93b9f9ff983
work_keys_str_mv AT carsond opticalbenchperformanceofacrysofregiqrestorregatlisaregtriandfinevisionregintraocularlenses
AT hillwe opticalbenchperformanceofacrysofregiqrestorregatlisaregtriandfinevisionregintraocularlenses
AT hongx opticalbenchperformanceofacrysofregiqrestorregatlisaregtriandfinevisionregintraocularlenses
AT karakellem opticalbenchperformanceofacrysofregiqrestorregatlisaregtriandfinevisionregintraocularlenses
_version_ 1718402057018277888

Ejemplares similares