Optical bench performance of AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR®, AT LISA® tri, and FineVision® intraocular lenses
Daniel Carson,1 Warren E Hill,2 Xin Hong,1 Mutlu Karakelle1 1Alcon Research, Ltd., Fort Worth, TX, USA; 2East Valley Ophthalmology, Mesa, AZ, USA Purpose: To compare the resolution and optical quality of the ReSTOR® +3.0 D and ReSTOR +2.5 D multifocal intraocular...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Carson D, Hill WE, Hong X, Karakelle M |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/9345596e715940c79a8ca93b9f9ff983 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Visian implantable contact lens versus AcrySof Cachet phakic intraocular lenses: comparison of aberrmetric profiles
por: Hosny MHM, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Comparison of ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography with the Heidelberg Spectralis® noncontact ultra-widefield module versus the Optos® Optomap®
por: Witmer MT, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Comparison of outcomes of conventional WaveLight® Allegretto Wave® and Technolas® excimer lasers in myopic laser in situ keratomileusis
por: Han DC, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Tobramycin administered by the TOBI® Podhaler® for persons with cystic fibrosis: a review
por: VanDevanter DR, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Travoprost with sofZia® preservative system lowered intraocular pressure of Japanese normal tension glaucoma with minimal side effects
por: Mizoue S, et al.
Publicado: (2014)