Tourism, knowledge management and its processes
When it comes to knowledge management (KM), one of the ways to classify it is through its processes. When it comes to tourism, it is the sectors that reveal its practical development. At this juncture, this article aims to analyze which are the tourism sectors that are considering KM in their r...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN ES PT |
Publicado: |
Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação em Turismo
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/934f6c2859b24012bc5f65803c818b9b |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:934f6c2859b24012bc5f65803c818b9b |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:934f6c2859b24012bc5f65803c818b9b2021-11-18T02:48:58ZTourism, knowledge management and its processes10.7784/rbtur.v16.23681982-6125https://doaj.org/article/934f6c2859b24012bc5f65803c818b9b2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://rbtur.org.br/rbtur/article/view/2368https://doaj.org/toc/1982-6125 When it comes to knowledge management (KM), one of the ways to classify it is through its processes. When it comes to tourism, it is the sectors that reveal its practical development. At this juncture, this article aims to analyze which are the tourism sectors that are considering KM in their research, as well as which KM processes are most used in tourism studies. To this end, this research is supported by an integrative literature review and follows the guidelines of the PRISMA recommendation. Due to the research protocol established and using the Scopus and Web of Science databases, an initial sample of 376 articles was obtained, of which 107 met the eligibility criteria. The research results are: (1) the most representative sectors are macro tourism and the accommodation services segment; (2) there is an emphasis on knowledge sharing and transfer processes, which are KM concerns also in other areas; (3) the researches highlight tacit knowledge, given its management complexity and the competitive differential it supports; (4) the researches on KM in tourism received criticism for low quality, complexity of scientific language, or disconnection with the managers and operators in the private and public sectors. Marcelo Henrique OtowiczLeonardo Lincoln Leite de LacerdaLuana EmmendoerferAlexandre Augusto BizAssociação Nacional de Pós-Graduação em TurismoarticleKnowledge managementTourismIntegrative reviewKnowledge sharingTacit knowledge.Geography. Anthropology. RecreationGRecreation. LeisureGV1-1860ENESPTRevista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo, Vol 16 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN ES PT |
topic |
Knowledge management Tourism Integrative review Knowledge sharing Tacit knowledge. Geography. Anthropology. Recreation G Recreation. Leisure GV1-1860 |
spellingShingle |
Knowledge management Tourism Integrative review Knowledge sharing Tacit knowledge. Geography. Anthropology. Recreation G Recreation. Leisure GV1-1860 Marcelo Henrique Otowicz Leonardo Lincoln Leite de Lacerda Luana Emmendoerfer Alexandre Augusto Biz Tourism, knowledge management and its processes |
description |
When it comes to knowledge management (KM), one of the ways to classify it is through its processes. When it comes to tourism, it is the sectors that reveal its practical development. At this juncture, this article aims to analyze which are the tourism sectors that are considering KM in their research, as well as which KM processes are most used in tourism studies. To this end, this research is supported by an integrative literature review and follows the guidelines of the PRISMA recommendation. Due to the research protocol established and using the Scopus and Web of Science databases, an initial sample of 376 articles was obtained, of which 107 met the eligibility criteria. The research results are: (1) the most representative sectors are macro tourism and the accommodation services segment; (2) there is an emphasis on knowledge sharing and transfer processes, which are KM concerns also in other areas; (3) the researches highlight tacit knowledge, given its management complexity and the competitive differential it supports; (4) the researches on KM in tourism received criticism for low quality, complexity of scientific language, or disconnection with the managers and operators in the private and public sectors.
|
format |
article |
author |
Marcelo Henrique Otowicz Leonardo Lincoln Leite de Lacerda Luana Emmendoerfer Alexandre Augusto Biz |
author_facet |
Marcelo Henrique Otowicz Leonardo Lincoln Leite de Lacerda Luana Emmendoerfer Alexandre Augusto Biz |
author_sort |
Marcelo Henrique Otowicz |
title |
Tourism, knowledge management and its processes |
title_short |
Tourism, knowledge management and its processes |
title_full |
Tourism, knowledge management and its processes |
title_fullStr |
Tourism, knowledge management and its processes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tourism, knowledge management and its processes |
title_sort |
tourism, knowledge management and its processes |
publisher |
Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação em Turismo |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/934f6c2859b24012bc5f65803c818b9b |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marcelohenriqueotowicz tourismknowledgemanagementanditsprocesses AT leonardolincolnleitedelacerda tourismknowledgemanagementanditsprocesses AT luanaemmendoerfer tourismknowledgemanagementanditsprocesses AT alexandreaugustobiz tourismknowledgemanagementanditsprocesses |
_version_ |
1718425178436796416 |