Tourism, knowledge management and its processes

When it comes to knowledge management (KM), one of the ways to classify it is through its processes. When it comes to tourism, it is the sectors that reveal its practical development. At this juncture, this article aims to analyze which are the tourism sectors that are considering KM in their r...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marcelo Henrique Otowicz, Leonardo Lincoln Leite de Lacerda, Luana Emmendoerfer, Alexandre Augusto Biz
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
ES
PT
Publicado: Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação em Turismo 2021
Materias:
G
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/934f6c2859b24012bc5f65803c818b9b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:934f6c2859b24012bc5f65803c818b9b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:934f6c2859b24012bc5f65803c818b9b2021-11-18T02:48:58ZTourism, knowledge management and its processes10.7784/rbtur.v16.23681982-6125https://doaj.org/article/934f6c2859b24012bc5f65803c818b9b2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://rbtur.org.br/rbtur/article/view/2368https://doaj.org/toc/1982-6125 When it comes to knowledge management (KM), one of the ways to classify it is through its processes. When it comes to tourism, it is the sectors that reveal its practical development. At this juncture, this article aims to analyze which are the tourism sectors that are considering KM in their research, as well as which KM processes are most used in tourism studies. To this end, this research is supported by an integrative literature review and follows the guidelines of the PRISMA recommendation. Due to the research protocol established and using the Scopus and Web of Science databases, an initial sample of 376 articles was obtained, of which 107 met the eligibility criteria. The research results are: (1) the most representative sectors are macro tourism and the accommodation services segment; (2) there is an emphasis on knowledge sharing and transfer processes, which are KM concerns also in other areas; (3) the researches highlight tacit knowledge, given its management complexity and the competitive differential it supports; (4) the researches on KM in tourism received criticism for low quality, complexity of scientific language, or disconnection with the managers and operators in the private and public sectors. Marcelo Henrique OtowiczLeonardo Lincoln Leite de LacerdaLuana EmmendoerferAlexandre Augusto BizAssociação Nacional de Pós-Graduação em TurismoarticleKnowledge managementTourismIntegrative reviewKnowledge sharingTacit knowledge.Geography. Anthropology. RecreationGRecreation. LeisureGV1-1860ENESPTRevista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo, Vol 16 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
ES
PT
topic Knowledge management
Tourism
Integrative review
Knowledge sharing
Tacit knowledge.
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation
G
Recreation. Leisure
GV1-1860
spellingShingle Knowledge management
Tourism
Integrative review
Knowledge sharing
Tacit knowledge.
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation
G
Recreation. Leisure
GV1-1860
Marcelo Henrique Otowicz
Leonardo Lincoln Leite de Lacerda
Luana Emmendoerfer
Alexandre Augusto Biz
Tourism, knowledge management and its processes
description When it comes to knowledge management (KM), one of the ways to classify it is through its processes. When it comes to tourism, it is the sectors that reveal its practical development. At this juncture, this article aims to analyze which are the tourism sectors that are considering KM in their research, as well as which KM processes are most used in tourism studies. To this end, this research is supported by an integrative literature review and follows the guidelines of the PRISMA recommendation. Due to the research protocol established and using the Scopus and Web of Science databases, an initial sample of 376 articles was obtained, of which 107 met the eligibility criteria. The research results are: (1) the most representative sectors are macro tourism and the accommodation services segment; (2) there is an emphasis on knowledge sharing and transfer processes, which are KM concerns also in other areas; (3) the researches highlight tacit knowledge, given its management complexity and the competitive differential it supports; (4) the researches on KM in tourism received criticism for low quality, complexity of scientific language, or disconnection with the managers and operators in the private and public sectors.
format article
author Marcelo Henrique Otowicz
Leonardo Lincoln Leite de Lacerda
Luana Emmendoerfer
Alexandre Augusto Biz
author_facet Marcelo Henrique Otowicz
Leonardo Lincoln Leite de Lacerda
Luana Emmendoerfer
Alexandre Augusto Biz
author_sort Marcelo Henrique Otowicz
title Tourism, knowledge management and its processes
title_short Tourism, knowledge management and its processes
title_full Tourism, knowledge management and its processes
title_fullStr Tourism, knowledge management and its processes
title_full_unstemmed Tourism, knowledge management and its processes
title_sort tourism, knowledge management and its processes
publisher Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação em Turismo
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/934f6c2859b24012bc5f65803c818b9b
work_keys_str_mv AT marcelohenriqueotowicz tourismknowledgemanagementanditsprocesses
AT leonardolincolnleitedelacerda tourismknowledgemanagementanditsprocesses
AT luanaemmendoerfer tourismknowledgemanagementanditsprocesses
AT alexandreaugustobiz tourismknowledgemanagementanditsprocesses
_version_ 1718425178436796416