Assessing the prognostic utility of smoldering multiple myeloma risk stratification scores applied serially post diagnosis

Abstract The Mayo-2018 smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) risk score is used routinely in the clinical setting but has only been validated at diagnosis. In SMM patients, the progression risk decreases over time. However, the utility of applying risk stratification models after diagnosis is unknown. W...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alissa Visram, S. Vincent Rajkumar, Prashant Kapoor, Angela Dispenzieri, Martha Q. Lacy, Morie A. Gertz, Francis K. Buadi, Suzanne R. Hayman, David Dingli, Taxiarchis Kourelis, Wilson Gonsalves, Rahma Warsame, Eli Muchtar, Nelson Leung, Linda B. Baughn, Robert A. Kyle, Shaji Kumar
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/93d4ece315db4f62bf0683715cca31d3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:93d4ece315db4f62bf0683715cca31d3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:93d4ece315db4f62bf0683715cca31d32021-11-28T12:41:08ZAssessing the prognostic utility of smoldering multiple myeloma risk stratification scores applied serially post diagnosis10.1038/s41408-021-00569-22044-5385https://doaj.org/article/93d4ece315db4f62bf0683715cca31d32021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-021-00569-2https://doaj.org/toc/2044-5385Abstract The Mayo-2018 smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) risk score is used routinely in the clinical setting but has only been validated at diagnosis. In SMM patients, the progression risk decreases over time. However, the utility of applying risk stratification models after diagnosis is unknown. We retrospectively studied 704 SMM patients and applied the Mayo 2018 and IMWG-2020 risk stratification models at annual landmark timepoints up to 5 years post diagnosis. The Mayo-2018 and IMWG-2020 models reliably stratified patients based on progression risk when applied post diagnosis. The respective 2-year progression risk in Mayo-2018 high risk patients versus IMWG-2020 intermediate-high risk patients was 51% versus 62% at the 1-year landmark and 47% versus 45% at the 4-year landmark. We showed that patients categorized at Mayo-2018 high-risk at follow-up had a similar risk of progression if the baseline risk assessment was low-intermediate versus high-risk (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.46–2.36, p = 0.931 at 5-year landmark). Patients migrating to a higher risk category during follow up had a higher progression risk compared to patients with stable/decreased risk categorization. Our findings support the use of these risk scores post-diagnosis and suggest that patients evolving to a high-risk category may benefit from early intervention therapeutic approaches.Alissa VisramS. Vincent RajkumarPrashant KapoorAngela DispenzieriMartha Q. LacyMorie A. GertzFrancis K. BuadiSuzanne R. HaymanDavid DingliTaxiarchis KourelisWilson GonsalvesRahma WarsameEli MuchtarNelson LeungLinda B. BaughnRobert A. KyleShaji KumarNature Publishing GrouparticleNeoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensRC254-282ENBlood Cancer Journal, Vol 11, Iss 11, Pp 1-8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
spellingShingle Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
Alissa Visram
S. Vincent Rajkumar
Prashant Kapoor
Angela Dispenzieri
Martha Q. Lacy
Morie A. Gertz
Francis K. Buadi
Suzanne R. Hayman
David Dingli
Taxiarchis Kourelis
Wilson Gonsalves
Rahma Warsame
Eli Muchtar
Nelson Leung
Linda B. Baughn
Robert A. Kyle
Shaji Kumar
Assessing the prognostic utility of smoldering multiple myeloma risk stratification scores applied serially post diagnosis
description Abstract The Mayo-2018 smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) risk score is used routinely in the clinical setting but has only been validated at diagnosis. In SMM patients, the progression risk decreases over time. However, the utility of applying risk stratification models after diagnosis is unknown. We retrospectively studied 704 SMM patients and applied the Mayo 2018 and IMWG-2020 risk stratification models at annual landmark timepoints up to 5 years post diagnosis. The Mayo-2018 and IMWG-2020 models reliably stratified patients based on progression risk when applied post diagnosis. The respective 2-year progression risk in Mayo-2018 high risk patients versus IMWG-2020 intermediate-high risk patients was 51% versus 62% at the 1-year landmark and 47% versus 45% at the 4-year landmark. We showed that patients categorized at Mayo-2018 high-risk at follow-up had a similar risk of progression if the baseline risk assessment was low-intermediate versus high-risk (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.46–2.36, p = 0.931 at 5-year landmark). Patients migrating to a higher risk category during follow up had a higher progression risk compared to patients with stable/decreased risk categorization. Our findings support the use of these risk scores post-diagnosis and suggest that patients evolving to a high-risk category may benefit from early intervention therapeutic approaches.
format article
author Alissa Visram
S. Vincent Rajkumar
Prashant Kapoor
Angela Dispenzieri
Martha Q. Lacy
Morie A. Gertz
Francis K. Buadi
Suzanne R. Hayman
David Dingli
Taxiarchis Kourelis
Wilson Gonsalves
Rahma Warsame
Eli Muchtar
Nelson Leung
Linda B. Baughn
Robert A. Kyle
Shaji Kumar
author_facet Alissa Visram
S. Vincent Rajkumar
Prashant Kapoor
Angela Dispenzieri
Martha Q. Lacy
Morie A. Gertz
Francis K. Buadi
Suzanne R. Hayman
David Dingli
Taxiarchis Kourelis
Wilson Gonsalves
Rahma Warsame
Eli Muchtar
Nelson Leung
Linda B. Baughn
Robert A. Kyle
Shaji Kumar
author_sort Alissa Visram
title Assessing the prognostic utility of smoldering multiple myeloma risk stratification scores applied serially post diagnosis
title_short Assessing the prognostic utility of smoldering multiple myeloma risk stratification scores applied serially post diagnosis
title_full Assessing the prognostic utility of smoldering multiple myeloma risk stratification scores applied serially post diagnosis
title_fullStr Assessing the prognostic utility of smoldering multiple myeloma risk stratification scores applied serially post diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the prognostic utility of smoldering multiple myeloma risk stratification scores applied serially post diagnosis
title_sort assessing the prognostic utility of smoldering multiple myeloma risk stratification scores applied serially post diagnosis
publisher Nature Publishing Group
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/93d4ece315db4f62bf0683715cca31d3
work_keys_str_mv AT alissavisram assessingtheprognosticutilityofsmolderingmultiplemyelomariskstratificationscoresappliedseriallypostdiagnosis
AT svincentrajkumar assessingtheprognosticutilityofsmolderingmultiplemyelomariskstratificationscoresappliedseriallypostdiagnosis
AT prashantkapoor assessingtheprognosticutilityofsmolderingmultiplemyelomariskstratificationscoresappliedseriallypostdiagnosis
AT angeladispenzieri assessingtheprognosticutilityofsmolderingmultiplemyelomariskstratificationscoresappliedseriallypostdiagnosis
AT marthaqlacy assessingtheprognosticutilityofsmolderingmultiplemyelomariskstratificationscoresappliedseriallypostdiagnosis
AT morieagertz assessingtheprognosticutilityofsmolderingmultiplemyelomariskstratificationscoresappliedseriallypostdiagnosis
AT franciskbuadi assessingtheprognosticutilityofsmolderingmultiplemyelomariskstratificationscoresappliedseriallypostdiagnosis
AT suzannerhayman assessingtheprognosticutilityofsmolderingmultiplemyelomariskstratificationscoresappliedseriallypostdiagnosis
AT daviddingli assessingtheprognosticutilityofsmolderingmultiplemyelomariskstratificationscoresappliedseriallypostdiagnosis
AT taxiarchiskourelis assessingtheprognosticutilityofsmolderingmultiplemyelomariskstratificationscoresappliedseriallypostdiagnosis
AT wilsongonsalves assessingtheprognosticutilityofsmolderingmultiplemyelomariskstratificationscoresappliedseriallypostdiagnosis
AT rahmawarsame assessingtheprognosticutilityofsmolderingmultiplemyelomariskstratificationscoresappliedseriallypostdiagnosis
AT elimuchtar assessingtheprognosticutilityofsmolderingmultiplemyelomariskstratificationscoresappliedseriallypostdiagnosis
AT nelsonleung assessingtheprognosticutilityofsmolderingmultiplemyelomariskstratificationscoresappliedseriallypostdiagnosis
AT lindabbaughn assessingtheprognosticutilityofsmolderingmultiplemyelomariskstratificationscoresappliedseriallypostdiagnosis
AT robertakyle assessingtheprognosticutilityofsmolderingmultiplemyelomariskstratificationscoresappliedseriallypostdiagnosis
AT shajikumar assessingtheprognosticutilityofsmolderingmultiplemyelomariskstratificationscoresappliedseriallypostdiagnosis
_version_ 1718407846409797632