Study on Professors’ Perception With Respect to Higher Education Institutions’ Socially Responsible Initiatives

The organization’s socially responsible actions integration and stakeholders’ demands is an increasingly encouraged practice by the market (Calabrese, Costa & Rosati, 2016). This article looks at the perception that the professor holds on the Higher Education Institution’s...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adriano Stadler, Edson Andrade dos Reis, Elaine Cristina Arantes, Jansen Maia Del Corso
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
PT
Publicado: FUCAPE Business School 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/93dfbc54cbba4bb7921dedfb70b37407
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:93dfbc54cbba4bb7921dedfb70b37407
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:93dfbc54cbba4bb7921dedfb70b374072021-11-11T15:48:07ZStudy on Professors’ Perception With Respect to Higher Education Institutions’ Socially Responsible Initiatives1807-734Xhttps://doaj.org/article/93dfbc54cbba4bb7921dedfb70b374072017-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=123053350003https://doaj.org/toc/1807-734XThe organization’s socially responsible actions integration and stakeholders’ demands is an increasingly encouraged practice by the market (Calabrese, Costa & Rosati, 2016). This article looks at the perception that the professor holds on the Higher Education Institution’s (HEI) socially responsible initiatives. Thus, a descriptive quantitative approach with non-probabilistic sample, accessibility and convenience was developed. The literature outlined the corporate social responsibility’s (CSR) main concepts, theories applications and stakeholders. Empirical research collected data from the HEI’s professors, through closed questionnaires. Descriptive analysis and multivariate statistics (cluster and factorial analysis) provided empirical evidence to the research. Results show the high concordance of professors in relation to the analysis categories: Economic, Legal, Ethical and Philanthropic, all of which are considered in this study, according to Carroll (2011). The sharpest legal dimension is given to the professors’ perception. Philanthropic responsibility showed the lowest agreement, coming out to the Carroll (2011) studies, which have supported this work.Adriano StadlerEdson Andrade dos ReisElaine Cristina ArantesJansen Maia Del CorsoFUCAPE Business Schoolarticlesocial responsibilitycorporate social responsibilitystakeholder theoryBusinessHF5001-6182ENPTBBR: Brazilian Business Review, Vol 14, Iss 6, Pp 592-608 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
PT
topic social responsibility
corporate social responsibility
stakeholder theory
Business
HF5001-6182
spellingShingle social responsibility
corporate social responsibility
stakeholder theory
Business
HF5001-6182
Adriano Stadler
Edson Andrade dos Reis
Elaine Cristina Arantes
Jansen Maia Del Corso
Study on Professors’ Perception With Respect to Higher Education Institutions’ Socially Responsible Initiatives
description The organization’s socially responsible actions integration and stakeholders’ demands is an increasingly encouraged practice by the market (Calabrese, Costa & Rosati, 2016). This article looks at the perception that the professor holds on the Higher Education Institution’s (HEI) socially responsible initiatives. Thus, a descriptive quantitative approach with non-probabilistic sample, accessibility and convenience was developed. The literature outlined the corporate social responsibility’s (CSR) main concepts, theories applications and stakeholders. Empirical research collected data from the HEI’s professors, through closed questionnaires. Descriptive analysis and multivariate statistics (cluster and factorial analysis) provided empirical evidence to the research. Results show the high concordance of professors in relation to the analysis categories: Economic, Legal, Ethical and Philanthropic, all of which are considered in this study, according to Carroll (2011). The sharpest legal dimension is given to the professors’ perception. Philanthropic responsibility showed the lowest agreement, coming out to the Carroll (2011) studies, which have supported this work.
format article
author Adriano Stadler
Edson Andrade dos Reis
Elaine Cristina Arantes
Jansen Maia Del Corso
author_facet Adriano Stadler
Edson Andrade dos Reis
Elaine Cristina Arantes
Jansen Maia Del Corso
author_sort Adriano Stadler
title Study on Professors’ Perception With Respect to Higher Education Institutions’ Socially Responsible Initiatives
title_short Study on Professors’ Perception With Respect to Higher Education Institutions’ Socially Responsible Initiatives
title_full Study on Professors’ Perception With Respect to Higher Education Institutions’ Socially Responsible Initiatives
title_fullStr Study on Professors’ Perception With Respect to Higher Education Institutions’ Socially Responsible Initiatives
title_full_unstemmed Study on Professors’ Perception With Respect to Higher Education Institutions’ Socially Responsible Initiatives
title_sort study on professors’ perception with respect to higher education institutions’ socially responsible initiatives
publisher FUCAPE Business School
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/93dfbc54cbba4bb7921dedfb70b37407
work_keys_str_mv AT adrianostadler studyonprofessorsperceptionwithrespecttohighereducationinstitutionssociallyresponsibleinitiatives
AT edsonandradedosreis studyonprofessorsperceptionwithrespecttohighereducationinstitutionssociallyresponsibleinitiatives
AT elainecristinaarantes studyonprofessorsperceptionwithrespecttohighereducationinstitutionssociallyresponsibleinitiatives
AT jansenmaiadelcorso studyonprofessorsperceptionwithrespecttohighereducationinstitutionssociallyresponsibleinitiatives
_version_ 1718433903075655680