Study on Professors’ Perception With Respect to Higher Education Institutions’ Socially Responsible Initiatives
The organization’s socially responsible actions integration and stakeholders’ demands is an increasingly encouraged practice by the market (Calabrese, Costa & Rosati, 2016). This article looks at the perception that the professor holds on the Higher Education Institution’s...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN PT |
Publicado: |
FUCAPE Business School
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/93dfbc54cbba4bb7921dedfb70b37407 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:93dfbc54cbba4bb7921dedfb70b37407 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:93dfbc54cbba4bb7921dedfb70b374072021-11-11T15:48:07ZStudy on Professors’ Perception With Respect to Higher Education Institutions’ Socially Responsible Initiatives1807-734Xhttps://doaj.org/article/93dfbc54cbba4bb7921dedfb70b374072017-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=123053350003https://doaj.org/toc/1807-734XThe organization’s socially responsible actions integration and stakeholders’ demands is an increasingly encouraged practice by the market (Calabrese, Costa & Rosati, 2016). This article looks at the perception that the professor holds on the Higher Education Institution’s (HEI) socially responsible initiatives. Thus, a descriptive quantitative approach with non-probabilistic sample, accessibility and convenience was developed. The literature outlined the corporate social responsibility’s (CSR) main concepts, theories applications and stakeholders. Empirical research collected data from the HEI’s professors, through closed questionnaires. Descriptive analysis and multivariate statistics (cluster and factorial analysis) provided empirical evidence to the research. Results show the high concordance of professors in relation to the analysis categories: Economic, Legal, Ethical and Philanthropic, all of which are considered in this study, according to Carroll (2011). The sharpest legal dimension is given to the professors’ perception. Philanthropic responsibility showed the lowest agreement, coming out to the Carroll (2011) studies, which have supported this work.Adriano StadlerEdson Andrade dos ReisElaine Cristina ArantesJansen Maia Del CorsoFUCAPE Business Schoolarticlesocial responsibilitycorporate social responsibilitystakeholder theoryBusinessHF5001-6182ENPTBBR: Brazilian Business Review, Vol 14, Iss 6, Pp 592-608 (2017) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN PT |
topic |
social responsibility corporate social responsibility stakeholder theory Business HF5001-6182 |
spellingShingle |
social responsibility corporate social responsibility stakeholder theory Business HF5001-6182 Adriano Stadler Edson Andrade dos Reis Elaine Cristina Arantes Jansen Maia Del Corso Study on Professors’ Perception With Respect to Higher Education Institutions’ Socially Responsible Initiatives |
description |
The organization’s socially responsible actions integration and stakeholders’ demands is an increasingly encouraged practice by the market (Calabrese, Costa & Rosati, 2016). This article looks at the perception that the professor holds on the Higher Education Institution’s (HEI) socially responsible initiatives. Thus, a descriptive quantitative approach with non-probabilistic sample, accessibility and convenience was developed. The literature outlined the corporate social responsibility’s (CSR) main concepts, theories applications and stakeholders. Empirical research collected data from the HEI’s professors, through closed questionnaires. Descriptive analysis and multivariate statistics (cluster and factorial analysis) provided empirical evidence to the research. Results show the high concordance of professors in relation to the analysis categories: Economic, Legal, Ethical and Philanthropic, all of which are considered in this study, according to Carroll (2011). The sharpest legal dimension is given to the professors’ perception. Philanthropic responsibility showed the lowest agreement, coming out to the Carroll (2011) studies, which have supported this work. |
format |
article |
author |
Adriano Stadler Edson Andrade dos Reis Elaine Cristina Arantes Jansen Maia Del Corso |
author_facet |
Adriano Stadler Edson Andrade dos Reis Elaine Cristina Arantes Jansen Maia Del Corso |
author_sort |
Adriano Stadler |
title |
Study on Professors’ Perception With Respect to Higher Education Institutions’ Socially Responsible Initiatives |
title_short |
Study on Professors’ Perception With Respect to Higher Education Institutions’ Socially Responsible Initiatives |
title_full |
Study on Professors’ Perception With Respect to Higher Education Institutions’ Socially Responsible Initiatives |
title_fullStr |
Study on Professors’ Perception With Respect to Higher Education Institutions’ Socially Responsible Initiatives |
title_full_unstemmed |
Study on Professors’ Perception With Respect to Higher Education Institutions’ Socially Responsible Initiatives |
title_sort |
study on professors’ perception with respect to higher education institutions’ socially responsible initiatives |
publisher |
FUCAPE Business School |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/93dfbc54cbba4bb7921dedfb70b37407 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT adrianostadler studyonprofessorsperceptionwithrespecttohighereducationinstitutionssociallyresponsibleinitiatives AT edsonandradedosreis studyonprofessorsperceptionwithrespecttohighereducationinstitutionssociallyresponsibleinitiatives AT elainecristinaarantes studyonprofessorsperceptionwithrespecttohighereducationinstitutionssociallyresponsibleinitiatives AT jansenmaiadelcorso studyonprofessorsperceptionwithrespecttohighereducationinstitutionssociallyresponsibleinitiatives |
_version_ |
1718433903075655680 |