Young adult perspectives on the selection of pharmaceuticals for mental health treatment

Shared decision making places an emphasis on patient understanding and engagement. However, when it comes to treatment selection, research tends to focus on how doctors select pharmaceutical treatments. The current study is a qualitative assessment of how patients choose among three common treatment...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alaina Talboy, Angela Aylward, Daniel Lende, Rodney Guttmann
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: The Beryl Institute 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/93f4f3e8032443cd914702d0b3cfbf35
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:93f4f3e8032443cd914702d0b3cfbf35
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:93f4f3e8032443cd914702d0b3cfbf352021-11-15T04:21:49ZYoung adult perspectives on the selection of pharmaceuticals for mental health treatment2372-0247https://doaj.org/article/93f4f3e8032443cd914702d0b3cfbf352016-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://pxjournal.org/journal/vol3/iss2/7https://doaj.org/toc/2372-0247Shared decision making places an emphasis on patient understanding and engagement. However, when it comes to treatment selection, research tends to focus on how doctors select pharmaceutical treatments. The current study is a qualitative assessment of how patients choose among three common treatments that have varying degrees of scientific support and side effects. We used qualitative data from 157 undergraduates (44 males, 113 females; mean age = 21.89 years) that was collected as part of a larger correlational study of depression and critical thinking skills. Qualitative analysis revealed three major themes: shared versus independent decision making, confidence in the research and the drug, and cost and availability. Some participants preferred to rely on informal networks such as consumer testimonials while others expressed a false sense of security for over-the-counter treatments because they believe the drugs are regulated. Many indicated that they avoid seeking mental health services because of the time and money needed. The results indicate several factors influence selection of common depression treatments. Young adults indicate that when reading prescription information, they most often rely on perceptions including ease of access, price, and beliefs about drug regulations. General guidelines for treatment descriptions were created based on the qualitative analysis.Alaina TalboyAngela AylwardDaniel LendeRodney GuttmannThe Beryl Institutearticlepatient experiencequalitative methodspatient engagementcommunicationpatient decision makingMedicine (General)R5-920Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENPatient Experience Journal (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic patient experience
qualitative methods
patient engagement
communication
patient decision making
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle patient experience
qualitative methods
patient engagement
communication
patient decision making
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Alaina Talboy
Angela Aylward
Daniel Lende
Rodney Guttmann
Young adult perspectives on the selection of pharmaceuticals for mental health treatment
description Shared decision making places an emphasis on patient understanding and engagement. However, when it comes to treatment selection, research tends to focus on how doctors select pharmaceutical treatments. The current study is a qualitative assessment of how patients choose among three common treatments that have varying degrees of scientific support and side effects. We used qualitative data from 157 undergraduates (44 males, 113 females; mean age = 21.89 years) that was collected as part of a larger correlational study of depression and critical thinking skills. Qualitative analysis revealed three major themes: shared versus independent decision making, confidence in the research and the drug, and cost and availability. Some participants preferred to rely on informal networks such as consumer testimonials while others expressed a false sense of security for over-the-counter treatments because they believe the drugs are regulated. Many indicated that they avoid seeking mental health services because of the time and money needed. The results indicate several factors influence selection of common depression treatments. Young adults indicate that when reading prescription information, they most often rely on perceptions including ease of access, price, and beliefs about drug regulations. General guidelines for treatment descriptions were created based on the qualitative analysis.
format article
author Alaina Talboy
Angela Aylward
Daniel Lende
Rodney Guttmann
author_facet Alaina Talboy
Angela Aylward
Daniel Lende
Rodney Guttmann
author_sort Alaina Talboy
title Young adult perspectives on the selection of pharmaceuticals for mental health treatment
title_short Young adult perspectives on the selection of pharmaceuticals for mental health treatment
title_full Young adult perspectives on the selection of pharmaceuticals for mental health treatment
title_fullStr Young adult perspectives on the selection of pharmaceuticals for mental health treatment
title_full_unstemmed Young adult perspectives on the selection of pharmaceuticals for mental health treatment
title_sort young adult perspectives on the selection of pharmaceuticals for mental health treatment
publisher The Beryl Institute
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/93f4f3e8032443cd914702d0b3cfbf35
work_keys_str_mv AT alainatalboy youngadultperspectivesontheselectionofpharmaceuticalsformentalhealthtreatment
AT angelaaylward youngadultperspectivesontheselectionofpharmaceuticalsformentalhealthtreatment
AT daniellende youngadultperspectivesontheselectionofpharmaceuticalsformentalhealthtreatment
AT rodneyguttmann youngadultperspectivesontheselectionofpharmaceuticalsformentalhealthtreatment
_version_ 1718428881036247040