A patrimonialização da memória social: uma forma de domesticação política das memórias dissidentes ou indígenas?

This article aims to introduce memorization practices, experienced by diverse groups, focusing on hegemonic memories (such as those represented in memory institutions like museums and archives as well as those carried on by its professional archivists, librarians, historians and official state polic...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Alejandra Aguilar Pinto
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	PT
Publicado:	Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) 2011
Materias:	indigenous memory institutions of memory practices of memorization Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/941b63c78322446291654423650f0ddb
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:941b63c78322446291654423650f0ddb
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:941b63c78322446291654423650f0ddb2021-11-11T15:41:58ZA patrimonialização da memória social: uma forma de domesticação política das memórias dissidentes ou indígenas?2177-6229https://doaj.org/article/941b63c78322446291654423650f0ddb2011-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93821299011https://doaj.org/toc/2177-6229This article aims to introduce memorization practices, experienced by diverse groups, focusing on hegemonic memories (such as those represented in memory institutions like museums and archives as well as those carried on by its professional archivists, librarians, historians and official state policies of patrimonialization) and dissenting memories (in our case, indigenous thought). The definition of history and memory (Popular memory group, 1982) has played a key-role during the construction of national identities and political domination, through the imposition of specific and partial versions as universal and shared ones, and through the occlusion, exclusion and silencing of the meanings of the past for subaltern groups. The same dynamic applied in processes of colonization, expropriation (Bonfil, 1993) and domestication (Gnecco, 2000). This paper questions to what extent the official mechanisms or devices of memory and forgetting were successful in silencing, change or represent truly the "non-hegemonic voices". On the other side, the paper introduces "new" forms of inscription and expression of non-hegemonic memories, other than documents in archives, such as body (corporal painting), rituals and landscape (sacred lands). Therefore, the definition of historical text expands dramatically. This research is situated at the crossroad of global and local cultural practices, which are represented most obviously in challenges around the definition of identities. Systems of historical representation (such as archives and museums) have played a crucial role in meeting this challenge. In spite of relations of subordination experienced by indigenous people, some groups have had success in reinventing and construct "another history".Alejandra Aguilar PintoUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)articleindigenous memoryinstitutions of memorypractices of memorizationSocial SciencesHSocial sciences (General)H1-99PTCiências Sociais Unisinos, Vol 47, Iss 3, Pp 273-283 (2011)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	PT
topic	indigenous memory institutions of memory practices of memorization Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
spellingShingle	indigenous memory institutions of memory practices of memorization Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99 Alejandra Aguilar Pinto A patrimonialização da memória social: uma forma de domesticação política das memórias dissidentes ou indígenas?
description	This article aims to introduce memorization practices, experienced by diverse groups, focusing on hegemonic memories (such as those represented in memory institutions like museums and archives as well as those carried on by its professional archivists, librarians, historians and official state policies of patrimonialization) and dissenting memories (in our case, indigenous thought). The definition of history and memory (Popular memory group, 1982) has played a key-role during the construction of national identities and political domination, through the imposition of specific and partial versions as universal and shared ones, and through the occlusion, exclusion and silencing of the meanings of the past for subaltern groups. The same dynamic applied in processes of colonization, expropriation (Bonfil, 1993) and domestication (Gnecco, 2000). This paper questions to what extent the official mechanisms or devices of memory and forgetting were successful in silencing, change or represent truly the "non-hegemonic voices". On the other side, the paper introduces "new" forms of inscription and expression of non-hegemonic memories, other than documents in archives, such as body (corporal painting), rituals and landscape (sacred lands). Therefore, the definition of historical text expands dramatically. This research is situated at the crossroad of global and local cultural practices, which are represented most obviously in challenges around the definition of identities. Systems of historical representation (such as archives and museums) have played a crucial role in meeting this challenge. In spite of relations of subordination experienced by indigenous people, some groups have had success in reinventing and construct "another history".
format	article
author	Alejandra Aguilar Pinto
author_facet	Alejandra Aguilar Pinto
author_sort	Alejandra Aguilar Pinto
title	A patrimonialização da memória social: uma forma de domesticação política das memórias dissidentes ou indígenas?
title_short	A patrimonialização da memória social: uma forma de domesticação política das memórias dissidentes ou indígenas?
title_full	A patrimonialização da memória social: uma forma de domesticação política das memórias dissidentes ou indígenas?
title_fullStr	A patrimonialização da memória social: uma forma de domesticação política das memórias dissidentes ou indígenas?
title_full_unstemmed	A patrimonialização da memória social: uma forma de domesticação política das memórias dissidentes ou indígenas?
title_sort	patrimonialização da memória social: uma forma de domesticação política das memórias dissidentes ou indígenas?
publisher	Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
publishDate	2011
url	https://doaj.org/article/941b63c78322446291654423650f0ddb
work_keys_str_mv	AT alejandraaguilarpinto apatrimonializacaodamemoriasocialumaformadedomesticacaopoliticadasmemoriasdissidentesouindigenas AT alejandraaguilarpinto patrimonializacaodamemoriasocialumaformadedomesticacaopoliticadasmemoriasdissidentesouindigenas
_version_	1718434162144182272

A patrimonialização da memória social: uma forma de domesticação política das memórias dissidentes ou indígenas?

Ejemplares similares