Formal and Stylistic Characteristics of Discourse Representation Modes in English Fiction

Formal and stylistic characteristics of the main discourse representation modes - direct, indirect and represented discourse - are considered. The comparative analysis of the Russian and English terminology of discourse representation modes is given. Formal indicators of direct, indirect and represe...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	N. L. Baydikova
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	RU
Publicado:	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2018
Materias:	discourse representation direct discourse indirect discourse represented discourse pragmatic ambiguity Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/942c306bc7dd499db2835e67bf0e4f61
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:942c306bc7dd499db2835e67bf0e4f61
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:942c306bc7dd499db2835e67bf0e4f612021-12-02T07:58:03ZFormal and Stylistic Characteristics of Discourse Representation Modes in English Fiction2225-756X2227-129510.24224/2227-1295-2018-3-19-31https://doaj.org/article/942c306bc7dd499db2835e67bf0e4f612018-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/736https://doaj.org/toc/2225-756Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2227-1295Formal and stylistic characteristics of the main discourse representation modes - direct, indirect and represented discourse - are considered. The comparative analysis of the Russian and English terminology of discourse representation modes is given. Formal indicators of direct, indirect and represented discourse are generalized and presented. When determining the stylistic status of discourse representation modes, the author denies the stylistic priority of represented discourse in comparison with two other discourse representation modes. It is asserted that all discourse representation modes have wide stylistic possibilities, realized by varying the formal and content characteristics of the narrator’s plane and that of the characters. The direct speech creates the effect of dynamism, naturalness, the reader's involvement in the story. It is proved that the indirect speech allows the narrator not only to represent the characters’ speech with different degrees of detailed elaboration, but also to express his attitude towards it. Particular attention is paid to the represented speech, which forces the reader to interpret the utterance himself due to its pragmatic ambiguity. The author confirms by examples that the represented discourse can create ambiguity not only of the narrative planes (those of the author or the characters), but also of the forms of speech (external or internal).N. L. BaydikovaTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovarticlediscourse representationdirect discourseindirect discourserepresented discoursepragmatic ambiguitySlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665RUНаучный диалог, Vol 0, Iss 3, Pp 19-31 (2018)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	RU
topic	discourse representation direct discourse indirect discourse represented discourse pragmatic ambiguity Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
spellingShingle	discourse representation direct discourse indirect discourse represented discourse pragmatic ambiguity Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 N. L. Baydikova Formal and Stylistic Characteristics of Discourse Representation Modes in English Fiction
description	Formal and stylistic characteristics of the main discourse representation modes - direct, indirect and represented discourse - are considered. The comparative analysis of the Russian and English terminology of discourse representation modes is given. Formal indicators of direct, indirect and represented discourse are generalized and presented. When determining the stylistic status of discourse representation modes, the author denies the stylistic priority of represented discourse in comparison with two other discourse representation modes. It is asserted that all discourse representation modes have wide stylistic possibilities, realized by varying the formal and content characteristics of the narrator’s plane and that of the characters. The direct speech creates the effect of dynamism, naturalness, the reader's involvement in the story. It is proved that the indirect speech allows the narrator not only to represent the characters’ speech with different degrees of detailed elaboration, but also to express his attitude towards it. Particular attention is paid to the represented speech, which forces the reader to interpret the utterance himself due to its pragmatic ambiguity. The author confirms by examples that the represented discourse can create ambiguity not only of the narrative planes (those of the author or the characters), but also of the forms of speech (external or internal).
format	article
author	N. L. Baydikova
author_facet	N. L. Baydikova
author_sort	N. L. Baydikova
title	Formal and Stylistic Characteristics of Discourse Representation Modes in English Fiction
title_short	Formal and Stylistic Characteristics of Discourse Representation Modes in English Fiction
title_full	Formal and Stylistic Characteristics of Discourse Representation Modes in English Fiction
title_fullStr	Formal and Stylistic Characteristics of Discourse Representation Modes in English Fiction
title_full_unstemmed	Formal and Stylistic Characteristics of Discourse Representation Modes in English Fiction
title_sort	formal and stylistic characteristics of discourse representation modes in english fiction
publisher	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
publishDate	2018
url	https://doaj.org/article/942c306bc7dd499db2835e67bf0e4f61
work_keys_str_mv	AT nlbaydikova formalandstylisticcharacteristicsofdiscourserepresentationmodesinenglishfiction
_version_	1718398999422042112

Formal and Stylistic Characteristics of Discourse Representation Modes in English Fiction

Ejemplares similares