Pomiędzy tradycją a współczesnością

he article is a review of Kamil Trombik’s book, in which he presents particular concepts of the philosophy of nature at the Pontifical Academy of Theology in Kraków in the years 1978 to 1993. It was the first and decisive period in the formation of the Faculty of Philosophy at the Academy. The goal...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Milena Cygan
Formato: article
Lenguaje:DE
EN
FR
PL
Publicado: Copernicus Center Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/943ff8734d8f415a985e5e709337b495
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:943ff8734d8f415a985e5e709337b495
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:943ff8734d8f415a985e5e709337b4952021-11-07T14:01:44ZPomiędzy tradycją a współczesnością0867-82862451-0602https://doaj.org/article/943ff8734d8f415a985e5e709337b4952021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://zfn.edu.pl/index.php/zfn/article/view/558https://doaj.org/toc/0867-8286https://doaj.org/toc/2451-0602he article is a review of Kamil Trombik’s book, in which he presents particular concepts of the philosophy of nature at the Pontifical Academy of Theology in Kraków in the years 1978 to 1993. It was the first and decisive period in the formation of the Faculty of Philosophy at the Academy. The goal of the monograph was to demonstrate the factors that contributed to philosophy of nature becoming one of the most prominent and representative trends in this academic center, as well as to attempt to answer the question of why “philosophy in science,” developed initially by Michał Heller and Józef Życiski, became the main style of doing philosophy of nature there. In the reporting part of the review main problems that the author raises are presented. They are collected in three chapters of his work, which corresponds to three initial phases of the formation of the philosophical department at the Pontifical Academy of Theology. Then, in the critical part, some aspects of Trombik’s work are assessed. First of all, the attention is paid to the part concerning the determination of the sources of “philosophy in science” which—although it seems to be the most interesting—is also the least original part of the work. Next, the contribution of Karol Wojtyła and many other lesser-known scientists and philosophers to the formation of an interdisciplinary atmosphere and the promotion of “philosophy in science” in the structures of The Pontifical Academy of Theology and the Krakow intellectual milieu is also appreciated. Many hypotheses and research perspectives in Trombik’s book are highlighted in the review, demonstrating the importance of this Krakow research center (Philosophy Department at the Pontifical Academy of Theology) for the history of Polish science and philosophy.Milena CyganCopernicus Center Pressarticlephilosophy in sciencephilosophy of natureinterdisciplinarityfaculty of philosophy at the pontifical academy of theology in krakowmichał hellerjózef życińskiPhilosophy (General)B1-5802DEENFRPLZagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce, Vol 70, Pp 213-226 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language DE
EN
FR
PL
topic philosophy in science
philosophy of nature
interdisciplinarity
faculty of philosophy at the pontifical academy of theology in krakow
michał heller
józef życiński
Philosophy (General)
B1-5802
spellingShingle philosophy in science
philosophy of nature
interdisciplinarity
faculty of philosophy at the pontifical academy of theology in krakow
michał heller
józef życiński
Philosophy (General)
B1-5802
Milena Cygan
Pomiędzy tradycją a współczesnością
description he article is a review of Kamil Trombik’s book, in which he presents particular concepts of the philosophy of nature at the Pontifical Academy of Theology in Kraków in the years 1978 to 1993. It was the first and decisive period in the formation of the Faculty of Philosophy at the Academy. The goal of the monograph was to demonstrate the factors that contributed to philosophy of nature becoming one of the most prominent and representative trends in this academic center, as well as to attempt to answer the question of why “philosophy in science,” developed initially by Michał Heller and Józef Życiski, became the main style of doing philosophy of nature there. In the reporting part of the review main problems that the author raises are presented. They are collected in three chapters of his work, which corresponds to three initial phases of the formation of the philosophical department at the Pontifical Academy of Theology. Then, in the critical part, some aspects of Trombik’s work are assessed. First of all, the attention is paid to the part concerning the determination of the sources of “philosophy in science” which—although it seems to be the most interesting—is also the least original part of the work. Next, the contribution of Karol Wojtyła and many other lesser-known scientists and philosophers to the formation of an interdisciplinary atmosphere and the promotion of “philosophy in science” in the structures of The Pontifical Academy of Theology and the Krakow intellectual milieu is also appreciated. Many hypotheses and research perspectives in Trombik’s book are highlighted in the review, demonstrating the importance of this Krakow research center (Philosophy Department at the Pontifical Academy of Theology) for the history of Polish science and philosophy.
format article
author Milena Cygan
author_facet Milena Cygan
author_sort Milena Cygan
title Pomiędzy tradycją a współczesnością
title_short Pomiędzy tradycją a współczesnością
title_full Pomiędzy tradycją a współczesnością
title_fullStr Pomiędzy tradycją a współczesnością
title_full_unstemmed Pomiędzy tradycją a współczesnością
title_sort pomiędzy tradycją a współczesnością
publisher Copernicus Center Press
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/943ff8734d8f415a985e5e709337b495
work_keys_str_mv AT milenacygan pomiedzytradycjaawspołczesnoscia
_version_ 1718443437205749760