Characteristics of effective collaborative care for treatment of depression: a systematic review and meta-regression of 74 randomised controlled trials.

<h4>Background</h4>Collaborative care is a complex intervention based on chronic disease management models and is effective in the management of depression. However, there is still uncertainty about which components of collaborative care are effective. We used meta-regression to identify...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Peter A Coventry, Joanna L Hudson, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Janine Archer, David A Richards, Simon Gilbody, Karina Lovell, Chris Dickens, Linda Gask, Waquas Waheed, Peter Bower
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/945037cd42e842aa8139726c7fa6cef9
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:945037cd42e842aa8139726c7fa6cef9
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:945037cd42e842aa8139726c7fa6cef92021-11-25T05:59:02ZCharacteristics of effective collaborative care for treatment of depression: a systematic review and meta-regression of 74 randomised controlled trials.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0108114https://doaj.org/article/945037cd42e842aa8139726c7fa6cef92014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108114https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Collaborative care is a complex intervention based on chronic disease management models and is effective in the management of depression. However, there is still uncertainty about which components of collaborative care are effective. We used meta-regression to identify factors in collaborative care associated with improvement in patient outcomes (depressive symptoms) and the process of care (use of anti-depressant medication).<h4>Methods and findings</h4>Systematic review with meta-regression. The Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Group trials registers were searched from inception to 9th February 2012. An update was run in the CENTRAL trials database on 29th December 2013. Inclusion criteria were: randomised controlled trials of collaborative care for adults ≥18 years with a primary diagnosis of depression or mixed anxiety and depressive disorder. Random effects meta-regression was used to estimate regression coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between study level covariates and depressive symptoms and relative risk (95% CI) and anti-depressant use. The association between anti-depressant use and improvement in depression was also explored. Seventy four trials were identified (85 comparisons, across 21,345 participants). Collaborative care that included psychological interventions predicted improvement in depression (β coefficient -0.11, 95% CI -0.20 to -0.01, p = 0.03). Systematic identification of patients (relative risk 1.43, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.81, p = 0.004) and the presence of a chronic physical condition (relative risk 1.32, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.65, p = 0.02) predicted use of anti-depressant medication.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Trials of collaborative care that included psychological treatment, with or without anti-depressant medication, appeared to improve depression more than those without psychological treatment. Trials that used systematic methods to identify patients with depression and also trials that included patients with a chronic physical condition reported improved use of anti-depressant medication. However, these findings are limited by the observational nature of meta-regression, incomplete data reporting, and the use of study aggregates.Peter A CoventryJoanna L HudsonEvangelos KontopantelisJanine ArcherDavid A RichardsSimon GilbodyKarina LovellChris DickensLinda GaskWaquas WaheedPeter BowerPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 9, p e108114 (2014)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Peter A Coventry Joanna L Hudson Evangelos Kontopantelis Janine Archer David A Richards Simon Gilbody Karina Lovell Chris Dickens Linda Gask Waquas Waheed Peter Bower Characteristics of effective collaborative care for treatment of depression: a systematic review and meta-regression of 74 randomised controlled trials.
description	<h4>Background</h4>Collaborative care is a complex intervention based on chronic disease management models and is effective in the management of depression. However, there is still uncertainty about which components of collaborative care are effective. We used meta-regression to identify factors in collaborative care associated with improvement in patient outcomes (depressive symptoms) and the process of care (use of anti-depressant medication).<h4>Methods and findings</h4>Systematic review with meta-regression. The Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Group trials registers were searched from inception to 9th February 2012. An update was run in the CENTRAL trials database on 29th December 2013. Inclusion criteria were: randomised controlled trials of collaborative care for adults ≥18 years with a primary diagnosis of depression or mixed anxiety and depressive disorder. Random effects meta-regression was used to estimate regression coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between study level covariates and depressive symptoms and relative risk (95% CI) and anti-depressant use. The association between anti-depressant use and improvement in depression was also explored. Seventy four trials were identified (85 comparisons, across 21,345 participants). Collaborative care that included psychological interventions predicted improvement in depression (β coefficient -0.11, 95% CI -0.20 to -0.01, p = 0.03). Systematic identification of patients (relative risk 1.43, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.81, p = 0.004) and the presence of a chronic physical condition (relative risk 1.32, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.65, p = 0.02) predicted use of anti-depressant medication.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Trials of collaborative care that included psychological treatment, with or without anti-depressant medication, appeared to improve depression more than those without psychological treatment. Trials that used systematic methods to identify patients with depression and also trials that included patients with a chronic physical condition reported improved use of anti-depressant medication. However, these findings are limited by the observational nature of meta-regression, incomplete data reporting, and the use of study aggregates.
format	article
author	Peter A Coventry Joanna L Hudson Evangelos Kontopantelis Janine Archer David A Richards Simon Gilbody Karina Lovell Chris Dickens Linda Gask Waquas Waheed Peter Bower
author_facet	Peter A Coventry Joanna L Hudson Evangelos Kontopantelis Janine Archer David A Richards Simon Gilbody Karina Lovell Chris Dickens Linda Gask Waquas Waheed Peter Bower
author_sort	Peter A Coventry
title	Characteristics of effective collaborative care for treatment of depression: a systematic review and meta-regression of 74 randomised controlled trials.
title_short	Characteristics of effective collaborative care for treatment of depression: a systematic review and meta-regression of 74 randomised controlled trials.
title_full	Characteristics of effective collaborative care for treatment of depression: a systematic review and meta-regression of 74 randomised controlled trials.
title_fullStr	Characteristics of effective collaborative care for treatment of depression: a systematic review and meta-regression of 74 randomised controlled trials.
title_full_unstemmed	Characteristics of effective collaborative care for treatment of depression: a systematic review and meta-regression of 74 randomised controlled trials.
title_sort	characteristics of effective collaborative care for treatment of depression: a systematic review and meta-regression of 74 randomised controlled trials.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2014
url	https://doaj.org/article/945037cd42e842aa8139726c7fa6cef9
work_keys_str_mv	AT peteracoventry characteristicsofeffectivecollaborativecarefortreatmentofdepressionasystematicreviewandmetaregressionof74randomisedcontrolledtrials AT joannalhudson characteristicsofeffectivecollaborativecarefortreatmentofdepressionasystematicreviewandmetaregressionof74randomisedcontrolledtrials AT evangeloskontopantelis characteristicsofeffectivecollaborativecarefortreatmentofdepressionasystematicreviewandmetaregressionof74randomisedcontrolledtrials AT janinearcher characteristicsofeffectivecollaborativecarefortreatmentofdepressionasystematicreviewandmetaregressionof74randomisedcontrolledtrials AT davidarichards characteristicsofeffectivecollaborativecarefortreatmentofdepressionasystematicreviewandmetaregressionof74randomisedcontrolledtrials AT simongilbody characteristicsofeffectivecollaborativecarefortreatmentofdepressionasystematicreviewandmetaregressionof74randomisedcontrolledtrials AT karinalovell characteristicsofeffectivecollaborativecarefortreatmentofdepressionasystematicreviewandmetaregressionof74randomisedcontrolledtrials AT chrisdickens characteristicsofeffectivecollaborativecarefortreatmentofdepressionasystematicreviewandmetaregressionof74randomisedcontrolledtrials AT lindagask characteristicsofeffectivecollaborativecarefortreatmentofdepressionasystematicreviewandmetaregressionof74randomisedcontrolledtrials AT waquaswaheed characteristicsofeffectivecollaborativecarefortreatmentofdepressionasystematicreviewandmetaregressionof74randomisedcontrolledtrials AT peterbower characteristicsofeffectivecollaborativecarefortreatmentofdepressionasystematicreviewandmetaregressionof74randomisedcontrolledtrials
_version_	1718414355389743104

Characteristics of effective collaborative care for treatment of depression: a systematic review and meta-regression of 74 randomised controlled trials.

Ejemplares similares