Influence of delivery method on neuroprotection by bone marrow mononuclear cell therapy following ventral root reimplantation with fibrin sealant.

The present work compared the local injection of mononuclear cells to the spinal cord lateral funiculus with the alternative approach of local delivery with fibrin sealant after ventral root avulsion (VRA) and reimplantation. For that, female adult Lewis rats were divided into the following groups:...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberta Barbizan, Mateus V Castro, Benedito Barraviera, Rui S Ferreira, Alexandre L R Oliveira
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/947c89de82074be2933e2bcafd7f9cde
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:947c89de82074be2933e2bcafd7f9cde
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:947c89de82074be2933e2bcafd7f9cde2021-11-25T06:03:09ZInfluence of delivery method on neuroprotection by bone marrow mononuclear cell therapy following ventral root reimplantation with fibrin sealant.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0105712https://doaj.org/article/947c89de82074be2933e2bcafd7f9cde2014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/25157845/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203The present work compared the local injection of mononuclear cells to the spinal cord lateral funiculus with the alternative approach of local delivery with fibrin sealant after ventral root avulsion (VRA) and reimplantation. For that, female adult Lewis rats were divided into the following groups: avulsion only, reimplantation with fibrin sealant; root repair with fibrin sealant associated with mononuclear cells; and repair with fibrin sealant and injected mononuclear cells. Cell therapy resulted in greater survival of spinal motoneurons up to four weeks post-surgery, especially when mononuclear cells were added to the fibrin glue. Injection of mononuclear cells to the lateral funiculus yield similar results to the reimplantation alone. Additionally, mononuclear cells added to the fibrin glue increased neurotrophic factor gene transcript levels in the spinal cord ventral horn. Regarding the motor recovery, evaluated by the functional peroneal index, as well as the paw print pressure, cell treated rats performed equally well as compared to reimplanted only animals, and significantly better than the avulsion only subjects. The results herein demonstrate that mononuclear cells therapy is neuroprotective by increasing levels of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and glial derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF). Moreover, the use of fibrin sealant mononuclear cells delivery approach gave the best and more long lasting results.Roberta BarbizanMateus V CastroBenedito BarravieraRui S FerreiraAlexandre L R OliveiraPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 8, p e105712 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Roberta Barbizan
Mateus V Castro
Benedito Barraviera
Rui S Ferreira
Alexandre L R Oliveira
Influence of delivery method on neuroprotection by bone marrow mononuclear cell therapy following ventral root reimplantation with fibrin sealant.
description The present work compared the local injection of mononuclear cells to the spinal cord lateral funiculus with the alternative approach of local delivery with fibrin sealant after ventral root avulsion (VRA) and reimplantation. For that, female adult Lewis rats were divided into the following groups: avulsion only, reimplantation with fibrin sealant; root repair with fibrin sealant associated with mononuclear cells; and repair with fibrin sealant and injected mononuclear cells. Cell therapy resulted in greater survival of spinal motoneurons up to four weeks post-surgery, especially when mononuclear cells were added to the fibrin glue. Injection of mononuclear cells to the lateral funiculus yield similar results to the reimplantation alone. Additionally, mononuclear cells added to the fibrin glue increased neurotrophic factor gene transcript levels in the spinal cord ventral horn. Regarding the motor recovery, evaluated by the functional peroneal index, as well as the paw print pressure, cell treated rats performed equally well as compared to reimplanted only animals, and significantly better than the avulsion only subjects. The results herein demonstrate that mononuclear cells therapy is neuroprotective by increasing levels of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and glial derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF). Moreover, the use of fibrin sealant mononuclear cells delivery approach gave the best and more long lasting results.
format article
author Roberta Barbizan
Mateus V Castro
Benedito Barraviera
Rui S Ferreira
Alexandre L R Oliveira
author_facet Roberta Barbizan
Mateus V Castro
Benedito Barraviera
Rui S Ferreira
Alexandre L R Oliveira
author_sort Roberta Barbizan
title Influence of delivery method on neuroprotection by bone marrow mononuclear cell therapy following ventral root reimplantation with fibrin sealant.
title_short Influence of delivery method on neuroprotection by bone marrow mononuclear cell therapy following ventral root reimplantation with fibrin sealant.
title_full Influence of delivery method on neuroprotection by bone marrow mononuclear cell therapy following ventral root reimplantation with fibrin sealant.
title_fullStr Influence of delivery method on neuroprotection by bone marrow mononuclear cell therapy following ventral root reimplantation with fibrin sealant.
title_full_unstemmed Influence of delivery method on neuroprotection by bone marrow mononuclear cell therapy following ventral root reimplantation with fibrin sealant.
title_sort influence of delivery method on neuroprotection by bone marrow mononuclear cell therapy following ventral root reimplantation with fibrin sealant.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/947c89de82074be2933e2bcafd7f9cde
work_keys_str_mv AT robertabarbizan influenceofdeliverymethodonneuroprotectionbybonemarrowmononuclearcelltherapyfollowingventralrootreimplantationwithfibrinsealant
AT mateusvcastro influenceofdeliverymethodonneuroprotectionbybonemarrowmononuclearcelltherapyfollowingventralrootreimplantationwithfibrinsealant
AT beneditobarraviera influenceofdeliverymethodonneuroprotectionbybonemarrowmononuclearcelltherapyfollowingventralrootreimplantationwithfibrinsealant
AT ruisferreira influenceofdeliverymethodonneuroprotectionbybonemarrowmononuclearcelltherapyfollowingventralrootreimplantationwithfibrinsealant
AT alexandrelroliveira influenceofdeliverymethodonneuroprotectionbybonemarrowmononuclearcelltherapyfollowingventralrootreimplantationwithfibrinsealant
_version_ 1718414235610906624