Promising effects of 33 to 36 Fr. bougie calibration for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Abstract The standard size of bougie for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is not yet established. Therefore, a systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted to assess the weight loss effects and associated complications of LSG for patients with morbid obesity, based on different bo...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/94837a9410c24fcd91761ae2885ba09e |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:94837a9410c24fcd91761ae2885ba09e |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:94837a9410c24fcd91761ae2885ba09e2021-12-02T16:23:42ZPromising effects of 33 to 36 Fr. bougie calibration for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis10.1038/s41598-021-94716-12045-2322https://doaj.org/article/94837a9410c24fcd91761ae2885ba09e2021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94716-1https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The standard size of bougie for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is not yet established. Therefore, a systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted to assess the weight loss effects and associated complications of LSG for patients with morbid obesity, based on different bougie sizes. A total of 15 studies were reviewed in this systemic review and network meta-analysis (2,848 participants), including RCTs and retrospective studies in PubMed, and Embase until September 1, 2020. The effectiveness of different bougie calibration sizes was assessed based on excess weight loss (EWL), total complications, and staple line leak. Within this network meta-analysis, S-sized (≤ 32 Fr.) and M-sized (33–36 Fr.) bougies had similar effects and were associated with the highest EWL improvement among all different bougie sizes (S-sized: standardized mean difference [SMD], 10.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] − 5.59 to − 26.63, surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA], 0.78; and M-sized: SMD, 10.16; 95% CI − 3.04–23.37; SUCRA, 0.75). M-sized bougie was associated with the lowest incidence of total complications (M-sized: odds ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.16–1.11; SUCRA, 0.92). Based on our network meta-analysis, using M-sized bougie (33–36 Fr.) is an optimal choice to balance the effectiveness and perioperative safety of LSG in the clinical practice.Po-Chih ChangKai-Hua ChenHong-Jie JhouPo-Huang ChenChih-Kun HuangCho-Hao LeeTing-Wei ChangNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Po-Chih Chang Kai-Hua Chen Hong-Jie Jhou Po-Huang Chen Chih-Kun Huang Cho-Hao Lee Ting-Wei Chang Promising effects of 33 to 36 Fr. bougie calibration for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
description |
Abstract The standard size of bougie for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is not yet established. Therefore, a systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted to assess the weight loss effects and associated complications of LSG for patients with morbid obesity, based on different bougie sizes. A total of 15 studies were reviewed in this systemic review and network meta-analysis (2,848 participants), including RCTs and retrospective studies in PubMed, and Embase until September 1, 2020. The effectiveness of different bougie calibration sizes was assessed based on excess weight loss (EWL), total complications, and staple line leak. Within this network meta-analysis, S-sized (≤ 32 Fr.) and M-sized (33–36 Fr.) bougies had similar effects and were associated with the highest EWL improvement among all different bougie sizes (S-sized: standardized mean difference [SMD], 10.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] − 5.59 to − 26.63, surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA], 0.78; and M-sized: SMD, 10.16; 95% CI − 3.04–23.37; SUCRA, 0.75). M-sized bougie was associated with the lowest incidence of total complications (M-sized: odds ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.16–1.11; SUCRA, 0.92). Based on our network meta-analysis, using M-sized bougie (33–36 Fr.) is an optimal choice to balance the effectiveness and perioperative safety of LSG in the clinical practice. |
format |
article |
author |
Po-Chih Chang Kai-Hua Chen Hong-Jie Jhou Po-Huang Chen Chih-Kun Huang Cho-Hao Lee Ting-Wei Chang |
author_facet |
Po-Chih Chang Kai-Hua Chen Hong-Jie Jhou Po-Huang Chen Chih-Kun Huang Cho-Hao Lee Ting-Wei Chang |
author_sort |
Po-Chih Chang |
title |
Promising effects of 33 to 36 Fr. bougie calibration for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_short |
Promising effects of 33 to 36 Fr. bougie calibration for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full |
Promising effects of 33 to 36 Fr. bougie calibration for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Promising effects of 33 to 36 Fr. bougie calibration for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Promising effects of 33 to 36 Fr. bougie calibration for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort |
promising effects of 33 to 36 fr. bougie calibration for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/94837a9410c24fcd91761ae2885ba09e |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pochihchang promisingeffectsof33to36frbougiecalibrationforlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT kaihuachen promisingeffectsof33to36frbougiecalibrationforlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT hongjiejhou promisingeffectsof33to36frbougiecalibrationforlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT pohuangchen promisingeffectsof33to36frbougiecalibrationforlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT chihkunhuang promisingeffectsof33to36frbougiecalibrationforlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT chohaolee promisingeffectsof33to36frbougiecalibrationforlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT tingweichang promisingeffectsof33to36frbougiecalibrationforlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1718384122896842752 |