Success of patient training in improving proficiency of eyedrop administration among various ophthalmic patient populations [Corrigendum]

Success of patient training in improving proficiency of eyedrop administration among various ophthalmic patient populations [Corrigendum]

Feng A, O’Neill J, Holt M, Georgiadis C, Wright MM, Montezuma SR. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1505–1511.Page 1505, line 3, “Results” section: “After education, 94% of patients versus 47% pre-teaching (P=0.0001) pulled down their lower eyelids. A total o...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feng A, O'Neill J, Holt M, Georgiadis C, Wright MM, Montezuma SR
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9491984134ca45a29db9fe2339bba206
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9491984134ca45a29db9fe2339bba206
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9491984134ca45a29db9fe2339bba2062021-12-02T07:06:19ZSuccess of patient training in improving proficiency of eyedrop administration among various ophthalmic patient populations [Corrigendum]1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/9491984134ca45a29db9fe2339bba2062017-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/corrigendum-success-of-patient-training-in-improving-proficiency-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Feng A, O’Neill J, Holt M, Georgiadis C, Wright MM, Montezuma SR. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1505–1511.Page 1505, line 3, “Results” section: “After education, 94% of patients versus 47% pre-teaching (P=0.0001) pulled down their lower eyelids. A total of 91% pre-teaching versus 59% post-teaching (P=0.0042) patients squeezed one drop into the lower fornix, 74% pre-teaching versus 26% post-teaching (P=0.0002) patients released the eyelid and closed the eye for 1 minute, and 56% pre-teaching versus 3% post-teaching (P=0.0001) patients applied nasal digital pressure on each eye.” This should have read as follows: “After education, 94% of patients versus 47% pre-teaching (P=0.0001) pulled down their lower eyelids. A total of 91% post-teaching versus 59% pre-teaching (P=0.0042) patients squeezed one drop into the lower fornix, 74% post-teaching versus 26% pre-teaching (P=0.0002) patients released the eyelid and closed the eye for 1 minute, and 56% post-teaching versus 3% pre-teaching (P=0.0001) patients applied nasal digital pressure on each eye.”Page 1510, “Acknowledgment” section: “This research was supported by funds from the Minnesota Lions Vision Foundation.” This section should have read as follows: “The study was funded by the Minnesota Lions Vision Foundation and an unrestricted grant to the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Neurosciences from the Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB), New York, NY, USA.” Read the original article Feng AO'Neill JHolt MGeorgiadis CWright MMMontezuma SRDove Medical PressarticleOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 11, Pp 329-330 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Feng A
O'Neill J
Holt M
Georgiadis C
Wright MM
Montezuma SR
Success of patient training in improving proficiency of eyedrop administration among various ophthalmic patient populations [Corrigendum]
description Feng A, O’Neill J, Holt M, Georgiadis C, Wright MM, Montezuma SR. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1505–1511.Page 1505, line 3, “Results” section: “After education, 94% of patients versus 47% pre-teaching (P=0.0001) pulled down their lower eyelids. A total of 91% pre-teaching versus 59% post-teaching (P=0.0042) patients squeezed one drop into the lower fornix, 74% pre-teaching versus 26% post-teaching (P=0.0002) patients released the eyelid and closed the eye for 1 minute, and 56% pre-teaching versus 3% post-teaching (P=0.0001) patients applied nasal digital pressure on each eye.” This should have read as follows: “After education, 94% of patients versus 47% pre-teaching (P=0.0001) pulled down their lower eyelids. A total of 91% post-teaching versus 59% pre-teaching (P=0.0042) patients squeezed one drop into the lower fornix, 74% post-teaching versus 26% pre-teaching (P=0.0002) patients released the eyelid and closed the eye for 1 minute, and 56% post-teaching versus 3% pre-teaching (P=0.0001) patients applied nasal digital pressure on each eye.”Page 1510, “Acknowledgment” section: “This research was supported by funds from the Minnesota Lions Vision Foundation.” This section should have read as follows: “The study was funded by the Minnesota Lions Vision Foundation and an unrestricted grant to the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Neurosciences from the Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB), New York, NY, USA.” Read the original article 
format article
author Feng A
O'Neill J
Holt M
Georgiadis C
Wright MM
Montezuma SR
author_facet Feng A
O'Neill J
Holt M
Georgiadis C
Wright MM
Montezuma SR
author_sort Feng A
title Success of patient training in improving proficiency of eyedrop administration among various ophthalmic patient populations [Corrigendum]
title_short Success of patient training in improving proficiency of eyedrop administration among various ophthalmic patient populations [Corrigendum]
title_full Success of patient training in improving proficiency of eyedrop administration among various ophthalmic patient populations [Corrigendum]
title_fullStr Success of patient training in improving proficiency of eyedrop administration among various ophthalmic patient populations [Corrigendum]
title_full_unstemmed Success of patient training in improving proficiency of eyedrop administration among various ophthalmic patient populations [Corrigendum]
title_sort success of patient training in improving proficiency of eyedrop administration among various ophthalmic patient populations [corrigendum]
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/9491984134ca45a29db9fe2339bba206
work_keys_str_mv AT fenga successofpatienttraininginimprovingproficiencyofeyedropadministrationamongvariousophthalmicpatientpopulationscorrigendum
AT oneillj successofpatienttraininginimprovingproficiencyofeyedropadministrationamongvariousophthalmicpatientpopulationscorrigendum
AT holtm successofpatienttraininginimprovingproficiencyofeyedropadministrationamongvariousophthalmicpatientpopulationscorrigendum
AT georgiadisc successofpatienttraininginimprovingproficiencyofeyedropadministrationamongvariousophthalmicpatientpopulationscorrigendum
AT wrightmm successofpatienttraininginimprovingproficiencyofeyedropadministrationamongvariousophthalmicpatientpopulationscorrigendum
AT montezumasr successofpatienttraininginimprovingproficiencyofeyedropadministrationamongvariousophthalmicpatientpopulationscorrigendum
_version_ 1718399589816467456

Ejemplares similares