Geertz versus Levi-Strauss: latent structural dispositions in Geertz "theory of culture"?

These are two authors, in Foucauldian terms that certainly belong to the most influential individuals in socio-cultural anthropology, as well as in the social sciences and interdisciplinary research more broadly. Claude Levi- Strauss became some kind of an "intellectual hero" during the do...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Gordana Gorunović
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FR SR
Publicado:	University of Belgrade 2016
Materias:	Anthropology GN1-890
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/94ad3e9456bb4244a6de00a231f1131c
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:94ad3e9456bb4244a6de00a231f1131c
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:94ad3e9456bb4244a6de00a231f1131c2021-12-02T06:03:42ZGeertz versus Levi-Strauss: latent structural dispositions in Geertz "theory of culture"?0353-15892334-8801https://doaj.org/article/94ad3e9456bb4244a6de00a231f1131c2016-02-01T00:00:00Zhttp://eap-iea.org/index.php/eap/article/view/295https://doaj.org/toc/0353-1589https://doaj.org/toc/2334-8801These are two authors, in Foucauldian terms that certainly belong to the most influential individuals in socio-cultural anthropology, as well as in the social sciences and interdisciplinary research more broadly. Claude Levi- Strauss became some kind of an "intellectual hero" during the domination of structuralism in the mid-twentieth century and during the 1960s, while Clifford Geertz was an ‘icon and ambassador’ of anthropology in the second half of the twentieth century. They are both one of the founders of the discourse theory. They not only established a distinct theoretical approaches and methods – structural (Levi-Strauss) and interpretative anthropology (Clifford Geertz), but through their intellectual authority they also inspired paradigms and intellectual movements making structuralism and "interpretation of culture" more than some passing episodes in the history of social though (in terms of "trendy ideas"). My aim is to make some parallels between these two authors, who despite all the differences that are evident in their epistemological discourses, theoretical approaches and methods (as well as in their ethnographic and anthropological writings itself) still have some similarities in their theorisation and interpretation of culture, which I would like to stress in this paper.Gordana GorunovićUniversity of BelgradearticleAnthropologyGN1-890ENFRSREtnoantropološki Problemi, Vol 4, Iss 2, Pp 53-74 (2016)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR SR
topic	Anthropology GN1-890
spellingShingle	Anthropology GN1-890 Gordana Gorunović Geertz versus Levi-Strauss: latent structural dispositions in Geertz "theory of culture"?
description	These are two authors, in Foucauldian terms that certainly belong to the most influential individuals in socio-cultural anthropology, as well as in the social sciences and interdisciplinary research more broadly. Claude Levi- Strauss became some kind of an "intellectual hero" during the domination of structuralism in the mid-twentieth century and during the 1960s, while Clifford Geertz was an ‘icon and ambassador’ of anthropology in the second half of the twentieth century. They are both one of the founders of the discourse theory. They not only established a distinct theoretical approaches and methods – structural (Levi-Strauss) and interpretative anthropology (Clifford Geertz), but through their intellectual authority they also inspired paradigms and intellectual movements making structuralism and "interpretation of culture" more than some passing episodes in the history of social though (in terms of "trendy ideas"). My aim is to make some parallels between these two authors, who despite all the differences that are evident in their epistemological discourses, theoretical approaches and methods (as well as in their ethnographic and anthropological writings itself) still have some similarities in their theorisation and interpretation of culture, which I would like to stress in this paper.
format	article
author	Gordana Gorunović
author_facet	Gordana Gorunović
author_sort	Gordana Gorunović
title	Geertz versus Levi-Strauss: latent structural dispositions in Geertz "theory of culture"?
title_short	Geertz versus Levi-Strauss: latent structural dispositions in Geertz "theory of culture"?
title_full	Geertz versus Levi-Strauss: latent structural dispositions in Geertz "theory of culture"?
title_fullStr	Geertz versus Levi-Strauss: latent structural dispositions in Geertz "theory of culture"?
title_full_unstemmed	Geertz versus Levi-Strauss: latent structural dispositions in Geertz "theory of culture"?
title_sort	geertz versus levi-strauss: latent structural dispositions in geertz "theory of culture"?
publisher	University of Belgrade
publishDate	2016
url	https://doaj.org/article/94ad3e9456bb4244a6de00a231f1131c
work_keys_str_mv	AT gordanagorunovic geertzversuslevistrausslatentstructuraldispositionsingeertztheoryofculture
_version_	1718400121995001856

Geertz versus Levi-Strauss: latent structural dispositions in Geertz "theory of culture"?

Ejemplares similares