Global taxonomic diversity of living reptiles.

Reptiles are one of the most ecologically and evolutionarily remarkable groups of living organisms, having successfully colonized most of the planet, including the oceans and some of the harshest and more environmentally unstable ecosystems on earth. Here, based on a complete dataset of all the worl...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daniel Pincheira-Donoso, Aaron M Bauer, Shai Meiri, Peter Uetz
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/94e4f8c17cff4be7a430c2c2976240ea
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:94e4f8c17cff4be7a430c2c2976240ea
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:94e4f8c17cff4be7a430c2c2976240ea2021-11-18T07:51:46ZGlobal taxonomic diversity of living reptiles.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0059741https://doaj.org/article/94e4f8c17cff4be7a430c2c2976240ea2013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23544091/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Reptiles are one of the most ecologically and evolutionarily remarkable groups of living organisms, having successfully colonized most of the planet, including the oceans and some of the harshest and more environmentally unstable ecosystems on earth. Here, based on a complete dataset of all the world's diversity of living reptiles, we analyse lineage taxonomic richness both within and among clades, at different levels of the phylogenetic hierarchy. We also analyse the historical tendencies in the descriptions of new reptile species from Linnaeus to March 2012. Although (non-avian) reptiles are the second most species-rich group of amniotes after birds, most of their diversity (96.3%) is concentrated in squamates (59% lizards, 35% snakes, and 2% amphisbaenians). In strong contrast, turtles (3.4%), crocodilians (0.3%), and tuataras (0.01%) are far less diverse. In terms of species discoveries, most turtles and crocodilians were described early, while descriptions of lizards, snakes and amphisbaenians are multimodal with respect to time. Lizard descriptions, in particular, have reached unprecedented levels during the last decade. Finally, despite such remarkably asymmetric distributions of reptile taxonomic diversity among groups, we found that the distributions of lineage richness are consistently right-skewed, with most clades (monophyletic families and genera) containing few lineages (monophyletic genera and species, respectively), while only a few have radiated greatly (notably the families Colubridae and Scincidae, and the lizard genera Anolis and Liolaemus). Therefore, such consistency in the frequency distribution of richness among clades and among phylogenetic levels suggests that the nature of reptile biodiversity is fundamentally fractal (i.e., it is scale invariant). We then compared current reptile diversity with the global reptile diversity and taxonomy known in 1980. Despite substantial differences in the taxonomies (relative to 2012), the patterns of lineage richness remain qualitatively identical, hence reinforcing our conclusions about the fractal nature of reptile biodiversity.Daniel Pincheira-DonosoAaron M BauerShai MeiriPeter UetzPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 3, p e59741 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Daniel Pincheira-Donoso
Aaron M Bauer
Shai Meiri
Peter Uetz
Global taxonomic diversity of living reptiles.
description Reptiles are one of the most ecologically and evolutionarily remarkable groups of living organisms, having successfully colonized most of the planet, including the oceans and some of the harshest and more environmentally unstable ecosystems on earth. Here, based on a complete dataset of all the world's diversity of living reptiles, we analyse lineage taxonomic richness both within and among clades, at different levels of the phylogenetic hierarchy. We also analyse the historical tendencies in the descriptions of new reptile species from Linnaeus to March 2012. Although (non-avian) reptiles are the second most species-rich group of amniotes after birds, most of their diversity (96.3%) is concentrated in squamates (59% lizards, 35% snakes, and 2% amphisbaenians). In strong contrast, turtles (3.4%), crocodilians (0.3%), and tuataras (0.01%) are far less diverse. In terms of species discoveries, most turtles and crocodilians were described early, while descriptions of lizards, snakes and amphisbaenians are multimodal with respect to time. Lizard descriptions, in particular, have reached unprecedented levels during the last decade. Finally, despite such remarkably asymmetric distributions of reptile taxonomic diversity among groups, we found that the distributions of lineage richness are consistently right-skewed, with most clades (monophyletic families and genera) containing few lineages (monophyletic genera and species, respectively), while only a few have radiated greatly (notably the families Colubridae and Scincidae, and the lizard genera Anolis and Liolaemus). Therefore, such consistency in the frequency distribution of richness among clades and among phylogenetic levels suggests that the nature of reptile biodiversity is fundamentally fractal (i.e., it is scale invariant). We then compared current reptile diversity with the global reptile diversity and taxonomy known in 1980. Despite substantial differences in the taxonomies (relative to 2012), the patterns of lineage richness remain qualitatively identical, hence reinforcing our conclusions about the fractal nature of reptile biodiversity.
format article
author Daniel Pincheira-Donoso
Aaron M Bauer
Shai Meiri
Peter Uetz
author_facet Daniel Pincheira-Donoso
Aaron M Bauer
Shai Meiri
Peter Uetz
author_sort Daniel Pincheira-Donoso
title Global taxonomic diversity of living reptiles.
title_short Global taxonomic diversity of living reptiles.
title_full Global taxonomic diversity of living reptiles.
title_fullStr Global taxonomic diversity of living reptiles.
title_full_unstemmed Global taxonomic diversity of living reptiles.
title_sort global taxonomic diversity of living reptiles.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/94e4f8c17cff4be7a430c2c2976240ea
work_keys_str_mv AT danielpincheiradonoso globaltaxonomicdiversityoflivingreptiles
AT aaronmbauer globaltaxonomicdiversityoflivingreptiles
AT shaimeiri globaltaxonomicdiversityoflivingreptiles
AT peteruetz globaltaxonomicdiversityoflivingreptiles
_version_ 1718422868827570176