A combined biomarker approach for characterising extracellular matrix profiles in acute myocardial infarction

Abstract Extracellular matrix (ECM) biomarkers are useful for measuring underlying molecular activity associated with cardiac repair following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The aim of this study was to conduct exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to examine the interrelationships between ECM bioma...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morgane M. Brunton-O’Sullivan, Ana S. Holley, Kathryn E. Hally, Gisela A. Kristono, Scott A. Harding, Peter D. Larsen
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/94f5cedadbea4858944def346c05b785
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:94f5cedadbea4858944def346c05b785
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:94f5cedadbea4858944def346c05b7852021-12-02T17:41:32ZA combined biomarker approach for characterising extracellular matrix profiles in acute myocardial infarction10.1038/s41598-021-92108-z2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/94f5cedadbea4858944def346c05b7852021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92108-zhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Extracellular matrix (ECM) biomarkers are useful for measuring underlying molecular activity associated with cardiac repair following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The aim of this study was to conduct exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to examine the interrelationships between ECM biomarkers, and cluster analysis to identify if distinct ECM profiles could distinguish patient risk in AMI. Ten ECM biomarkers were measured from plasma in 140 AMI patients: MMP-2, -3, -8, -9, periostin, procollagen I N-Terminal propeptide, osteopontin, TGF-β1, TIMP-1 and -4. EFA grouped eight ECM biomarkers into a two-factor solution, which comprised three biomarkers in Factor 1 and five biomarkers in Factor 2. Notably, ECM biomarkers were not separated based on biological function. Cluster analysis grouped AMI patients into three distinct clusters. Cluster One (n = 54) had increased levels of MMP-8, MMP-9, and TGF-B1. Cluster Two (n = 43) had elevated levels of MMP-2, MMP-3, osteopontin, periostin and TIMP-1, and increased high-sensitivity troponin T and GRACE scores. Cluster Three (n = 43) had decreased levels of ECM biomarkers. Circulating ECM biomarkers demonstrated collinearity and entwined biological functions based on EFA analysis. Using cluster analysis, patients with similar clinical presentations could be separated into distinct ECM profiles that were associated with differential patient risk. Clinical significance remains to be determined.Morgane M. Brunton-O’SullivanAna S. HolleyKathryn E. HallyGisela A. KristonoScott A. HardingPeter D. LarsenNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Morgane M. Brunton-O’Sullivan
Ana S. Holley
Kathryn E. Hally
Gisela A. Kristono
Scott A. Harding
Peter D. Larsen
A combined biomarker approach for characterising extracellular matrix profiles in acute myocardial infarction
description Abstract Extracellular matrix (ECM) biomarkers are useful for measuring underlying molecular activity associated with cardiac repair following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The aim of this study was to conduct exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to examine the interrelationships between ECM biomarkers, and cluster analysis to identify if distinct ECM profiles could distinguish patient risk in AMI. Ten ECM biomarkers were measured from plasma in 140 AMI patients: MMP-2, -3, -8, -9, periostin, procollagen I N-Terminal propeptide, osteopontin, TGF-β1, TIMP-1 and -4. EFA grouped eight ECM biomarkers into a two-factor solution, which comprised three biomarkers in Factor 1 and five biomarkers in Factor 2. Notably, ECM biomarkers were not separated based on biological function. Cluster analysis grouped AMI patients into three distinct clusters. Cluster One (n = 54) had increased levels of MMP-8, MMP-9, and TGF-B1. Cluster Two (n = 43) had elevated levels of MMP-2, MMP-3, osteopontin, periostin and TIMP-1, and increased high-sensitivity troponin T and GRACE scores. Cluster Three (n = 43) had decreased levels of ECM biomarkers. Circulating ECM biomarkers demonstrated collinearity and entwined biological functions based on EFA analysis. Using cluster analysis, patients with similar clinical presentations could be separated into distinct ECM profiles that were associated with differential patient risk. Clinical significance remains to be determined.
format article
author Morgane M. Brunton-O’Sullivan
Ana S. Holley
Kathryn E. Hally
Gisela A. Kristono
Scott A. Harding
Peter D. Larsen
author_facet Morgane M. Brunton-O’Sullivan
Ana S. Holley
Kathryn E. Hally
Gisela A. Kristono
Scott A. Harding
Peter D. Larsen
author_sort Morgane M. Brunton-O’Sullivan
title A combined biomarker approach for characterising extracellular matrix profiles in acute myocardial infarction
title_short A combined biomarker approach for characterising extracellular matrix profiles in acute myocardial infarction
title_full A combined biomarker approach for characterising extracellular matrix profiles in acute myocardial infarction
title_fullStr A combined biomarker approach for characterising extracellular matrix profiles in acute myocardial infarction
title_full_unstemmed A combined biomarker approach for characterising extracellular matrix profiles in acute myocardial infarction
title_sort combined biomarker approach for characterising extracellular matrix profiles in acute myocardial infarction
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/94f5cedadbea4858944def346c05b785
work_keys_str_mv AT morganembruntonosullivan acombinedbiomarkerapproachforcharacterisingextracellularmatrixprofilesinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT anasholley acombinedbiomarkerapproachforcharacterisingextracellularmatrixprofilesinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT kathrynehally acombinedbiomarkerapproachforcharacterisingextracellularmatrixprofilesinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT giselaakristono acombinedbiomarkerapproachforcharacterisingextracellularmatrixprofilesinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT scottaharding acombinedbiomarkerapproachforcharacterisingextracellularmatrixprofilesinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT peterdlarsen acombinedbiomarkerapproachforcharacterisingextracellularmatrixprofilesinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT morganembruntonosullivan combinedbiomarkerapproachforcharacterisingextracellularmatrixprofilesinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT anasholley combinedbiomarkerapproachforcharacterisingextracellularmatrixprofilesinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT kathrynehally combinedbiomarkerapproachforcharacterisingextracellularmatrixprofilesinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT giselaakristono combinedbiomarkerapproachforcharacterisingextracellularmatrixprofilesinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT scottaharding combinedbiomarkerapproachforcharacterisingextracellularmatrixprofilesinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT peterdlarsen combinedbiomarkerapproachforcharacterisingextracellularmatrixprofilesinacutemyocardialinfarction
_version_ 1718379658872881152