Synchronising institutions and value systems: A model of opinion dynamics mediated by proportional representation.

Individuals increasingly participate in online platforms where they copy, share and form they opinions. Social interactions in these platforms are mediated by digital institutions, which dictate algorithms that in turn affect how users form and evolve their opinions. In this work, we examine the con...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jose Segovia-Martin, Monica Tamariz
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/95129cdb1d12476395048a12e6f8fef1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:95129cdb1d12476395048a12e6f8fef1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:95129cdb1d12476395048a12e6f8fef12021-12-02T20:14:06ZSynchronising institutions and value systems: A model of opinion dynamics mediated by proportional representation.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0257525https://doaj.org/article/95129cdb1d12476395048a12e6f8fef12021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257525https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Individuals increasingly participate in online platforms where they copy, share and form they opinions. Social interactions in these platforms are mediated by digital institutions, which dictate algorithms that in turn affect how users form and evolve their opinions. In this work, we examine the conditions under which convergence on shared opinions can be obtained in a social network where connected agents repeatedly update their normalised cardinal preferences (i.e. value systems) under the influence of a non-constant reflexive signal (i.e. institution) that aggregates populations' information using a proportional representation rule. We analyse the impact of institutions that aggregate (i) expressed opinions (i.e. opinion-aggregation institutions), and (ii) cardinal preferences (i.e. value-aggregation institutions). We find that, in certain regions of the parameter space, moderate institutional influence can lead to moderate consensus and strong institutional influence can lead to polarisation. In our randomised network, local coordination alone in the total absence of institutions does not lead to convergence on shared opinions, but very low levels of institutional influence are sufficient to generate a feedback loop that favours global conventions. We also show that opinion-aggregation may act as a catalyst for value change and convergence. When applied to digital institutions, we show that the best mechanism to avoid extremism is to increase the initial diversity of the value systems in the population.Jose Segovia-MartinMonica TamarizPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 9, p e0257525 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Jose Segovia-Martin
Monica Tamariz
Synchronising institutions and value systems: A model of opinion dynamics mediated by proportional representation.
description Individuals increasingly participate in online platforms where they copy, share and form they opinions. Social interactions in these platforms are mediated by digital institutions, which dictate algorithms that in turn affect how users form and evolve their opinions. In this work, we examine the conditions under which convergence on shared opinions can be obtained in a social network where connected agents repeatedly update their normalised cardinal preferences (i.e. value systems) under the influence of a non-constant reflexive signal (i.e. institution) that aggregates populations' information using a proportional representation rule. We analyse the impact of institutions that aggregate (i) expressed opinions (i.e. opinion-aggregation institutions), and (ii) cardinal preferences (i.e. value-aggregation institutions). We find that, in certain regions of the parameter space, moderate institutional influence can lead to moderate consensus and strong institutional influence can lead to polarisation. In our randomised network, local coordination alone in the total absence of institutions does not lead to convergence on shared opinions, but very low levels of institutional influence are sufficient to generate a feedback loop that favours global conventions. We also show that opinion-aggregation may act as a catalyst for value change and convergence. When applied to digital institutions, we show that the best mechanism to avoid extremism is to increase the initial diversity of the value systems in the population.
format article
author Jose Segovia-Martin
Monica Tamariz
author_facet Jose Segovia-Martin
Monica Tamariz
author_sort Jose Segovia-Martin
title Synchronising institutions and value systems: A model of opinion dynamics mediated by proportional representation.
title_short Synchronising institutions and value systems: A model of opinion dynamics mediated by proportional representation.
title_full Synchronising institutions and value systems: A model of opinion dynamics mediated by proportional representation.
title_fullStr Synchronising institutions and value systems: A model of opinion dynamics mediated by proportional representation.
title_full_unstemmed Synchronising institutions and value systems: A model of opinion dynamics mediated by proportional representation.
title_sort synchronising institutions and value systems: a model of opinion dynamics mediated by proportional representation.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/95129cdb1d12476395048a12e6f8fef1
work_keys_str_mv AT josesegoviamartin synchronisinginstitutionsandvaluesystemsamodelofopiniondynamicsmediatedbyproportionalrepresentation
AT monicatamariz synchronisinginstitutionsandvaluesystemsamodelofopiniondynamicsmediatedbyproportionalrepresentation
_version_ 1718374720566460416