A randomised controlled single-centre open-label pharmacokinetic study to examine various approaches of nicotine delivery using electronic cigarettes
Abstract Smokers who switch completely to e-cigarettes may reduce their relative risk of tobacco-related disease. Effective nicotine delivery from e-cigarettes is important in consumer acceptance. We assessed whether protonated nicotine and e-cigarette devices delivering greater aerosol mass increas...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/95642d38e7844b059c8b536763de053e |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:95642d38e7844b059c8b536763de053e |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:95642d38e7844b059c8b536763de053e2021-12-02T16:08:53ZA randomised controlled single-centre open-label pharmacokinetic study to examine various approaches of nicotine delivery using electronic cigarettes10.1038/s41598-020-76610-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/95642d38e7844b059c8b536763de053e2020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76610-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Smokers who switch completely to e-cigarettes may reduce their relative risk of tobacco-related disease. Effective nicotine delivery from e-cigarettes is important in consumer acceptance. We assessed whether protonated nicotine and e-cigarette devices delivering greater aerosol mass increase nicotine delivery and product liking. A randomised controlled non-blinded eight-arm crossover study was used to assess plasma nicotine pharmacokinetics and product liking for two e-cigarettes (Vype ePen3 and Vype ePen) with various nicotine e-liquid formulations and a conventional cigarette among 24 healthy dual-users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes. Product use and puff count were also assessed. Results show that nicotine bioavailability was greater for Vype ePen3 with greater aerosol mass delivery than for Vype ePen (Cmax, p = 0.0073; AUC0–120 min, p = 0.0102). Protonated nicotine (18 mg/mL, medium protonation) e-liquid yielded higher nicotine bioavailability than unprotonated nicotine (18 mg/mL) e-liquid (Cmax, p = 0.0001; AUC0–120 min, p = 0.0026). There was no significant difference in Tmax between e-liquids. Nicotine bioavailability did not differ between nicotine benzoate formulation (30 mg/mL nicotine, high protonation) and combustible cigarettes (Cmax, p = 0.79; AUC0–120 min, p = 0.13). Vype ePen3 with protonated nicotine delivers nicotine more efficiently with the potential to increase product liking relative to earlier devices using unprotonated e-liquid.James K. EbajemitoMichael McEwanNathan GaleOscar M. CamachoGeorge HardieChristopher J. ProctorNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2020) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q James K. Ebajemito Michael McEwan Nathan Gale Oscar M. Camacho George Hardie Christopher J. Proctor A randomised controlled single-centre open-label pharmacokinetic study to examine various approaches of nicotine delivery using electronic cigarettes |
description |
Abstract Smokers who switch completely to e-cigarettes may reduce their relative risk of tobacco-related disease. Effective nicotine delivery from e-cigarettes is important in consumer acceptance. We assessed whether protonated nicotine and e-cigarette devices delivering greater aerosol mass increase nicotine delivery and product liking. A randomised controlled non-blinded eight-arm crossover study was used to assess plasma nicotine pharmacokinetics and product liking for two e-cigarettes (Vype ePen3 and Vype ePen) with various nicotine e-liquid formulations and a conventional cigarette among 24 healthy dual-users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes. Product use and puff count were also assessed. Results show that nicotine bioavailability was greater for Vype ePen3 with greater aerosol mass delivery than for Vype ePen (Cmax, p = 0.0073; AUC0–120 min, p = 0.0102). Protonated nicotine (18 mg/mL, medium protonation) e-liquid yielded higher nicotine bioavailability than unprotonated nicotine (18 mg/mL) e-liquid (Cmax, p = 0.0001; AUC0–120 min, p = 0.0026). There was no significant difference in Tmax between e-liquids. Nicotine bioavailability did not differ between nicotine benzoate formulation (30 mg/mL nicotine, high protonation) and combustible cigarettes (Cmax, p = 0.79; AUC0–120 min, p = 0.13). Vype ePen3 with protonated nicotine delivers nicotine more efficiently with the potential to increase product liking relative to earlier devices using unprotonated e-liquid. |
format |
article |
author |
James K. Ebajemito Michael McEwan Nathan Gale Oscar M. Camacho George Hardie Christopher J. Proctor |
author_facet |
James K. Ebajemito Michael McEwan Nathan Gale Oscar M. Camacho George Hardie Christopher J. Proctor |
author_sort |
James K. Ebajemito |
title |
A randomised controlled single-centre open-label pharmacokinetic study to examine various approaches of nicotine delivery using electronic cigarettes |
title_short |
A randomised controlled single-centre open-label pharmacokinetic study to examine various approaches of nicotine delivery using electronic cigarettes |
title_full |
A randomised controlled single-centre open-label pharmacokinetic study to examine various approaches of nicotine delivery using electronic cigarettes |
title_fullStr |
A randomised controlled single-centre open-label pharmacokinetic study to examine various approaches of nicotine delivery using electronic cigarettes |
title_full_unstemmed |
A randomised controlled single-centre open-label pharmacokinetic study to examine various approaches of nicotine delivery using electronic cigarettes |
title_sort |
randomised controlled single-centre open-label pharmacokinetic study to examine various approaches of nicotine delivery using electronic cigarettes |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/95642d38e7844b059c8b536763de053e |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jameskebajemito arandomisedcontrolledsinglecentreopenlabelpharmacokineticstudytoexaminevariousapproachesofnicotinedeliveryusingelectroniccigarettes AT michaelmcewan arandomisedcontrolledsinglecentreopenlabelpharmacokineticstudytoexaminevariousapproachesofnicotinedeliveryusingelectroniccigarettes AT nathangale arandomisedcontrolledsinglecentreopenlabelpharmacokineticstudytoexaminevariousapproachesofnicotinedeliveryusingelectroniccigarettes AT oscarmcamacho arandomisedcontrolledsinglecentreopenlabelpharmacokineticstudytoexaminevariousapproachesofnicotinedeliveryusingelectroniccigarettes AT georgehardie arandomisedcontrolledsinglecentreopenlabelpharmacokineticstudytoexaminevariousapproachesofnicotinedeliveryusingelectroniccigarettes AT christopherjproctor arandomisedcontrolledsinglecentreopenlabelpharmacokineticstudytoexaminevariousapproachesofnicotinedeliveryusingelectroniccigarettes AT jameskebajemito randomisedcontrolledsinglecentreopenlabelpharmacokineticstudytoexaminevariousapproachesofnicotinedeliveryusingelectroniccigarettes AT michaelmcewan randomisedcontrolledsinglecentreopenlabelpharmacokineticstudytoexaminevariousapproachesofnicotinedeliveryusingelectroniccigarettes AT nathangale randomisedcontrolledsinglecentreopenlabelpharmacokineticstudytoexaminevariousapproachesofnicotinedeliveryusingelectroniccigarettes AT oscarmcamacho randomisedcontrolledsinglecentreopenlabelpharmacokineticstudytoexaminevariousapproachesofnicotinedeliveryusingelectroniccigarettes AT georgehardie randomisedcontrolledsinglecentreopenlabelpharmacokineticstudytoexaminevariousapproachesofnicotinedeliveryusingelectroniccigarettes AT christopherjproctor randomisedcontrolledsinglecentreopenlabelpharmacokineticstudytoexaminevariousapproachesofnicotinedeliveryusingelectroniccigarettes |
_version_ |
1718384485267931136 |