The updated national research agenda 2021–2026 for prehospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi study

Abstract Background In 2015, a national research agenda was established for Dutch prehospital EMS to underpin the evidence base of care delivery and inform policymakers and funders. The continuously increasing demand for ambulance care and the reorientation towards the role of EMS in recent years ma...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lilian C. M. Vloet, Gijs Hesselink, Sivera A. A. Berben, Margreet Hoogeveen, Paul J. T. Rood, Remco H. A. Ebben
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/95659a2f2de54ee6a920339e70e2ccca
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:95659a2f2de54ee6a920339e70e2ccca
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:95659a2f2de54ee6a920339e70e2ccca2021-11-21T12:15:10ZThe updated national research agenda 2021–2026 for prehospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi study10.1186/s13049-021-00971-61757-7241https://doaj.org/article/95659a2f2de54ee6a920339e70e2ccca2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00971-6https://doaj.org/toc/1757-7241Abstract Background In 2015, a national research agenda was established for Dutch prehospital EMS to underpin the evidence base of care delivery and inform policymakers and funders. The continuously increasing demand for ambulance care and the reorientation towards the role of EMS in recent years may have changed research priorities. Therefore, this study aimed to update the Dutch national EMS research agenda. Methods A three-round online Delphi survey was used to explore and discuss different viewpoints and to reach consensus on research priorities (i.e., themes and special interest groups, e.g. patient types who require specific research attention). A multidisciplinary expert panel (n = 62) was recruited in the field of prehospital EMS and delegates of relevant professional organizations and stakeholders participated. In round one, fifty-nine research themes and six special interest groups (derived from several resources) were rated on importance on a 5-point scale by the panel members. In round two, the panel selected their priority themes and special interest groups (yes/no), and those with a positive difference score were further assessed in round three. In this final round, appropriateness of the remaining themes and agreement within the panel was taken into account, following the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, which resulted in the final list of research priorities. Results The survey response per round varied between 94 and 100 percent. In round one, a reduction from 59 to 25 themes and the selection of three special interest groups was realized. Round two resulted in the prioritization of six themes and one special interest group ('Vulnerable elderly'). Round three showed an adequate level of agreement regarding all six themes: 'Registration and (digital) exchange of patient data in the chain of emergency care'; 'Mobile care consultation/Non conveyance'; 'Care coordination'; 'Cooperation with professional partners within the care domain'; 'Care differentiation' and 'Triage and urgency classification'. Conclusions The updated Dutch national EMS research agenda builds further on the previous version and introduces new EMS research priorities that correspond with the future challenges prehospital EMS care is faced with. This agenda will guide researchers, policymakers and funding bodies in prioritizing future research projects.Lilian C. M. VloetGijs HesselinkSivera A. A. BerbenMargreet HoogeveenPaul J. T. RoodRemco H. A. EbbenBMCarticleAmbulanceEmergency Medical ServicesEvidence based practiceResearch prioritiesDelphi studyMedical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aidRC86-88.9ENScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, Vol 29, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Ambulance
Emergency Medical Services
Evidence based practice
Research priorities
Delphi study
Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid
RC86-88.9
spellingShingle Ambulance
Emergency Medical Services
Evidence based practice
Research priorities
Delphi study
Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid
RC86-88.9
Lilian C. M. Vloet
Gijs Hesselink
Sivera A. A. Berben
Margreet Hoogeveen
Paul J. T. Rood
Remco H. A. Ebben
The updated national research agenda 2021–2026 for prehospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi study
description Abstract Background In 2015, a national research agenda was established for Dutch prehospital EMS to underpin the evidence base of care delivery and inform policymakers and funders. The continuously increasing demand for ambulance care and the reorientation towards the role of EMS in recent years may have changed research priorities. Therefore, this study aimed to update the Dutch national EMS research agenda. Methods A three-round online Delphi survey was used to explore and discuss different viewpoints and to reach consensus on research priorities (i.e., themes and special interest groups, e.g. patient types who require specific research attention). A multidisciplinary expert panel (n = 62) was recruited in the field of prehospital EMS and delegates of relevant professional organizations and stakeholders participated. In round one, fifty-nine research themes and six special interest groups (derived from several resources) were rated on importance on a 5-point scale by the panel members. In round two, the panel selected their priority themes and special interest groups (yes/no), and those with a positive difference score were further assessed in round three. In this final round, appropriateness of the remaining themes and agreement within the panel was taken into account, following the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, which resulted in the final list of research priorities. Results The survey response per round varied between 94 and 100 percent. In round one, a reduction from 59 to 25 themes and the selection of three special interest groups was realized. Round two resulted in the prioritization of six themes and one special interest group ('Vulnerable elderly'). Round three showed an adequate level of agreement regarding all six themes: 'Registration and (digital) exchange of patient data in the chain of emergency care'; 'Mobile care consultation/Non conveyance'; 'Care coordination'; 'Cooperation with professional partners within the care domain'; 'Care differentiation' and 'Triage and urgency classification'. Conclusions The updated Dutch national EMS research agenda builds further on the previous version and introduces new EMS research priorities that correspond with the future challenges prehospital EMS care is faced with. This agenda will guide researchers, policymakers and funding bodies in prioritizing future research projects.
format article
author Lilian C. M. Vloet
Gijs Hesselink
Sivera A. A. Berben
Margreet Hoogeveen
Paul J. T. Rood
Remco H. A. Ebben
author_facet Lilian C. M. Vloet
Gijs Hesselink
Sivera A. A. Berben
Margreet Hoogeveen
Paul J. T. Rood
Remco H. A. Ebben
author_sort Lilian C. M. Vloet
title The updated national research agenda 2021–2026 for prehospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi study
title_short The updated national research agenda 2021–2026 for prehospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi study
title_full The updated national research agenda 2021–2026 for prehospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi study
title_fullStr The updated national research agenda 2021–2026 for prehospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi study
title_full_unstemmed The updated national research agenda 2021–2026 for prehospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi study
title_sort updated national research agenda 2021–2026 for prehospital emergency medical services in the netherlands: a delphi study
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/95659a2f2de54ee6a920339e70e2ccca
work_keys_str_mv AT liliancmvloet theupdatednationalresearchagenda20212026forprehospitalemergencymedicalservicesinthenetherlandsadelphistudy
AT gijshesselink theupdatednationalresearchagenda20212026forprehospitalemergencymedicalservicesinthenetherlandsadelphistudy
AT siveraaaberben theupdatednationalresearchagenda20212026forprehospitalemergencymedicalservicesinthenetherlandsadelphistudy
AT margreethoogeveen theupdatednationalresearchagenda20212026forprehospitalemergencymedicalservicesinthenetherlandsadelphistudy
AT pauljtrood theupdatednationalresearchagenda20212026forprehospitalemergencymedicalservicesinthenetherlandsadelphistudy
AT remcohaebben theupdatednationalresearchagenda20212026forprehospitalemergencymedicalservicesinthenetherlandsadelphistudy
AT liliancmvloet updatednationalresearchagenda20212026forprehospitalemergencymedicalservicesinthenetherlandsadelphistudy
AT gijshesselink updatednationalresearchagenda20212026forprehospitalemergencymedicalservicesinthenetherlandsadelphistudy
AT siveraaaberben updatednationalresearchagenda20212026forprehospitalemergencymedicalservicesinthenetherlandsadelphistudy
AT margreethoogeveen updatednationalresearchagenda20212026forprehospitalemergencymedicalservicesinthenetherlandsadelphistudy
AT pauljtrood updatednationalresearchagenda20212026forprehospitalemergencymedicalservicesinthenetherlandsadelphistudy
AT remcohaebben updatednationalresearchagenda20212026forprehospitalemergencymedicalservicesinthenetherlandsadelphistudy
_version_ 1718419138698805248