Are Elementary Schools Ready for Disaster Preparedness and Safety?

Many schools are located in high-risk areas. Safety education in Indonesia is limited to disaster education with a risk paradigm. The practice is separated from Child-Friendly School, which protects children from violence. In addition, many contents of safety education have not been provided in scho...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Widowati Evi, Heru Sutomo Adi, Istiono Wahyudi
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FR
Publicado:	EDP Sciences 2021
Materias:	Environmental sciences GE1-350
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/95677b26869c4337b0085c23dd63ae38
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:95677b26869c4337b0085c23dd63ae38
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:95677b26869c4337b0085c23dd63ae382021-11-08T15:19:57ZAre Elementary Schools Ready for Disaster Preparedness and Safety?2267-124210.1051/e3sconf/202131701087https://doaj.org/article/95677b26869c4337b0085c23dd63ae382021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/93/e3sconf_icenis2021_01087.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2267-1242Many schools are located in high-risk areas. Safety education in Indonesia is limited to disaster education with a risk paradigm. The practice is separated from Child-Friendly School, which protects children from violence. In addition, many contents of safety education have not been provided in school because of many limitations. Therefore the development of Disaster Preparedness and Safety School/Sekolah Selamat Siaga Bencana (SSSB) model with a multi-hazard approach is viewed as a strategic move, especially during the current Covid-19 pandemic. The purpose is to determine the indicators that can reflect SSSB measurement tools. This was a descriptive study with a three-stage multi-method approach, starting from a literature review to formulate the constructs and indicators. Subsequently, I used qualitative and quantitative methods combined with the sequential exploratory method. Sampling was conducted by the purposive sampling method. The results show that the measurement tool consists of 7 constructs, 29 indicators, and 80 questions that reflect SSSB: commitment, curriculum, information exposure, infrastructure and facilities, preparedness, monitoring system, empowerment of institutional roles and capacity of school communities. The instrument’s content validity as measured by the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI) indicated high content validity. This measuring tool can help schools to increase school resilience from multi-hazard threats.Widowati EviHeru Sutomo AdiIstiono WahyudiEDP SciencesarticleEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350ENFRE3S Web of Conferences, Vol 317, p 01087 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR
topic	Environmental sciences GE1-350
spellingShingle	Environmental sciences GE1-350 Widowati Evi Heru Sutomo Adi Istiono Wahyudi Are Elementary Schools Ready for Disaster Preparedness and Safety?
description	Many schools are located in high-risk areas. Safety education in Indonesia is limited to disaster education with a risk paradigm. The practice is separated from Child-Friendly School, which protects children from violence. In addition, many contents of safety education have not been provided in school because of many limitations. Therefore the development of Disaster Preparedness and Safety School/Sekolah Selamat Siaga Bencana (SSSB) model with a multi-hazard approach is viewed as a strategic move, especially during the current Covid-19 pandemic. The purpose is to determine the indicators that can reflect SSSB measurement tools. This was a descriptive study with a three-stage multi-method approach, starting from a literature review to formulate the constructs and indicators. Subsequently, I used qualitative and quantitative methods combined with the sequential exploratory method. Sampling was conducted by the purposive sampling method. The results show that the measurement tool consists of 7 constructs, 29 indicators, and 80 questions that reflect SSSB: commitment, curriculum, information exposure, infrastructure and facilities, preparedness, monitoring system, empowerment of institutional roles and capacity of school communities. The instrument’s content validity as measured by the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI) indicated high content validity. This measuring tool can help schools to increase school resilience from multi-hazard threats.
format	article
author	Widowati Evi Heru Sutomo Adi Istiono Wahyudi
author_facet	Widowati Evi Heru Sutomo Adi Istiono Wahyudi
author_sort	Widowati Evi
title	Are Elementary Schools Ready for Disaster Preparedness and Safety?
title_short	Are Elementary Schools Ready for Disaster Preparedness and Safety?
title_full	Are Elementary Schools Ready for Disaster Preparedness and Safety?
title_fullStr	Are Elementary Schools Ready for Disaster Preparedness and Safety?
title_full_unstemmed	Are Elementary Schools Ready for Disaster Preparedness and Safety?
title_sort	are elementary schools ready for disaster preparedness and safety?
publisher	EDP Sciences
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/95677b26869c4337b0085c23dd63ae38
work_keys_str_mv	AT widowatievi areelementaryschoolsreadyfordisasterpreparednessandsafety AT herusutomoadi areelementaryschoolsreadyfordisasterpreparednessandsafety AT istionowahyudi areelementaryschoolsreadyfordisasterpreparednessandsafety
_version_	1718441869925416960

Are Elementary Schools Ready for Disaster Preparedness and Safety?

Ejemplares similares