RETHINKING THE HERITAGE VALUE FROM DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES, CASE STUDY IN YOGYAKARTA

Purpose Today heritage is of strategic importance not only because of its historical value, but also due to the capacity to sustain traditional philosophy. A problem arose in association with the over-commercialisation of heritage that led to a question of how the citizens react to the problem and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Johannes Parlindungan Siregar, Wara Indira Rukmi
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Konya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and Design 2020
Materias:	Heritage conservation official heritage unofficial heritage traditional philosophy Yogyakarta Architecture NA1-9428 City planning HT165.5-169.9
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/958d0ecc019e4606a3b8644ef62abcf5
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:958d0ecc019e4606a3b8644ef62abcf5
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:958d0ecc019e4606a3b8644ef62abcf52021-11-07T06:21:39ZRETHINKING THE HERITAGE VALUE FROM DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES, CASE STUDY IN YOGYAKARTA10.15320/ICONARP.2020.1242147-9380https://doaj.org/article/958d0ecc019e4606a3b8644ef62abcf52020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://iconarp.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarp/article/view/427https://doaj.org/toc/2147-9380 Purpose Today heritage is of strategic importance not only because of its historical value, but also due to the capacity to sustain traditional philosophy. A problem arose in association with the over-commercialisation of heritage that led to a question of how the citizens react to the problem and the emerging values. The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between heritage conservation practices conducted by the government and local people. Design/Methodology/Approach This study used qualitative analysis to investigate official documents and newspapers. In-depth interviews were used to elaborate citizens’ perception about heritage values. Findings There were connection and disconnection between the implementation of heritage conservation policy and citizens’ opinions about conservation practices. The connection should be maintained to anticipate the change of meanings and overcome problems stemmed from heritage tourism and the uncontrolled urban development. Research Limitations/Implications This study bridged a possibility of evaluating the impact of urban development on heritage value by assessing perspectives from different social actors. It was evidenced that the official and unofficial values of heritage are differently recognised. However, this study had a limitation in terms of the social group involved in interviews. The analytical framework of this research needs to be developed incorporating quantitative analysis with a survey of particular population in Yogyakarta. This kind of study is essential to discovering how the population reacts to urban development and heritage sites. Social/Practical Implications The government should not dominate the practice of heritage conservation. It is essential to maintain the cultural authenticity of heritage by involving general public in monitoring urban development surrounding heritage sites. Originality/Value This study provides a framework for integrating different perspectives to better recognise and manage heritage sites and the overall urban landscape. This framework can be used as a foundation for evaluating heritage impact relating to societal changes and the dynamics of urban development. Johannes Parlindungan SiregarWara Indira RukmiKonya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and DesignarticleHeritage conservationofficial heritageunofficial heritagetraditional philosophyYogyakartaArchitectureNA1-9428City planningHT165.5-169.9ENIconarp International Journal of Architecture and Planning, Vol 8, Iss 2 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Heritage conservation official heritage unofficial heritage traditional philosophy Yogyakarta Architecture NA1-9428 City planning HT165.5-169.9
spellingShingle	Heritage conservation official heritage unofficial heritage traditional philosophy Yogyakarta Architecture NA1-9428 City planning HT165.5-169.9 Johannes Parlindungan Siregar Wara Indira Rukmi RETHINKING THE HERITAGE VALUE FROM DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES, CASE STUDY IN YOGYAKARTA
description	Purpose Today heritage is of strategic importance not only because of its historical value, but also due to the capacity to sustain traditional philosophy. A problem arose in association with the over-commercialisation of heritage that led to a question of how the citizens react to the problem and the emerging values. The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between heritage conservation practices conducted by the government and local people. Design/Methodology/Approach This study used qualitative analysis to investigate official documents and newspapers. In-depth interviews were used to elaborate citizens’ perception about heritage values. Findings There were connection and disconnection between the implementation of heritage conservation policy and citizens’ opinions about conservation practices. The connection should be maintained to anticipate the change of meanings and overcome problems stemmed from heritage tourism and the uncontrolled urban development. Research Limitations/Implications This study bridged a possibility of evaluating the impact of urban development on heritage value by assessing perspectives from different social actors. It was evidenced that the official and unofficial values of heritage are differently recognised. However, this study had a limitation in terms of the social group involved in interviews. The analytical framework of this research needs to be developed incorporating quantitative analysis with a survey of particular population in Yogyakarta. This kind of study is essential to discovering how the population reacts to urban development and heritage sites. Social/Practical Implications The government should not dominate the practice of heritage conservation. It is essential to maintain the cultural authenticity of heritage by involving general public in monitoring urban development surrounding heritage sites. Originality/Value This study provides a framework for integrating different perspectives to better recognise and manage heritage sites and the overall urban landscape. This framework can be used as a foundation for evaluating heritage impact relating to societal changes and the dynamics of urban development.
format	article
author	Johannes Parlindungan Siregar Wara Indira Rukmi
author_facet	Johannes Parlindungan Siregar Wara Indira Rukmi
author_sort	Johannes Parlindungan Siregar
title	RETHINKING THE HERITAGE VALUE FROM DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES, CASE STUDY IN YOGYAKARTA
title_short	RETHINKING THE HERITAGE VALUE FROM DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES, CASE STUDY IN YOGYAKARTA
title_full	RETHINKING THE HERITAGE VALUE FROM DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES, CASE STUDY IN YOGYAKARTA
title_fullStr	RETHINKING THE HERITAGE VALUE FROM DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES, CASE STUDY IN YOGYAKARTA
title_full_unstemmed	RETHINKING THE HERITAGE VALUE FROM DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES, CASE STUDY IN YOGYAKARTA
title_sort	rethinking the heritage value from different perspectives, case study in yogyakarta
publisher	Konya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and Design
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/958d0ecc019e4606a3b8644ef62abcf5
work_keys_str_mv	AT johannesparlindungansiregar rethinkingtheheritagevaluefromdifferentperspectivescasestudyinyogyakarta AT waraindirarukmi rethinkingtheheritagevaluefromdifferentperspectivescasestudyinyogyakarta
_version_	1718443626164387840

RETHINKING THE HERITAGE VALUE FROM DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES, CASE STUDY IN YOGYAKARTA

Ejemplares similares