Moxibustion for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Objective. This review aimed at systematically evaluating the efficacy and safety of moxibustion for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Methods. Relevant trials were searched in seven digital databases up to January 2021. After literature screening, data extraction, and literature quality evaluation, t...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Limited
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/9590da2638a94a0bb55b7cc5f8888776 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:9590da2638a94a0bb55b7cc5f8888776 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:9590da2638a94a0bb55b7cc5f88887762021-11-22T01:10:47ZMoxibustion for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis1741-428810.1155/2021/6418217https://doaj.org/article/9590da2638a94a0bb55b7cc5f88887762021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6418217https://doaj.org/toc/1741-4288Objective. This review aimed at systematically evaluating the efficacy and safety of moxibustion for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Methods. Relevant trials were searched in seven digital databases up to January 2021. After literature screening, data extraction, and literature quality evaluation, the included studies were meta-analyzed using RevMan 5.4 software. The evidence level was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Results. Fifteen studies involving 1030 CFS participants were included. Meta-analyses showed a favorable effect of moxibustion on the total effective rate compared with acupuncture (OR = 4.58, 95%CI = [2.85, 7.35], P<0.00001) and drugs (OR = 6.36, 95%CI = [3.48, 11.59], P<0.00001). Moxibustion also appeared to significantly reduce fatigue severity measured by fatigue scale-14 (FS-14) (WMD = −2.20, 95% CI = [−3.16, −1.24], P<0.00001) and fatigue assessment instrument (FAI) (WMD = −16.36, 95% CI = [−26.58, −6.14], P=0.002) compared with the control group. In addition, among the 15 included studies, only two studies reported adverse events related to moxibustion, and the symptoms were relatively mild. The quality of evidence based on the 15 included trials was assessed as moderate to very low. Conclusions. Based on limited evidence, moxibustion might be an effective and safe complementary therapy for CFS, which can be recommended to manage CFS. Because of the limited level of evidence in this review, further high-quality trials are still needed to confirm these findings.Jianyu YouJing YeHaiyan LiWenguo YeEnsi HongHindawi LimitedarticleOther systems of medicineRZ201-999ENEvidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Vol 2021 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Other systems of medicine RZ201-999 |
spellingShingle |
Other systems of medicine RZ201-999 Jianyu You Jing Ye Haiyan Li Wenguo Ye Ensi Hong Moxibustion for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
description |
Objective. This review aimed at systematically evaluating the efficacy and safety of moxibustion for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Methods. Relevant trials were searched in seven digital databases up to January 2021. After literature screening, data extraction, and literature quality evaluation, the included studies were meta-analyzed using RevMan 5.4 software. The evidence level was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Results. Fifteen studies involving 1030 CFS participants were included. Meta-analyses showed a favorable effect of moxibustion on the total effective rate compared with acupuncture (OR = 4.58, 95%CI = [2.85, 7.35], P<0.00001) and drugs (OR = 6.36, 95%CI = [3.48, 11.59], P<0.00001). Moxibustion also appeared to significantly reduce fatigue severity measured by fatigue scale-14 (FS-14) (WMD = −2.20, 95% CI = [−3.16, −1.24], P<0.00001) and fatigue assessment instrument (FAI) (WMD = −16.36, 95% CI = [−26.58, −6.14], P=0.002) compared with the control group. In addition, among the 15 included studies, only two studies reported adverse events related to moxibustion, and the symptoms were relatively mild. The quality of evidence based on the 15 included trials was assessed as moderate to very low. Conclusions. Based on limited evidence, moxibustion might be an effective and safe complementary therapy for CFS, which can be recommended to manage CFS. Because of the limited level of evidence in this review, further high-quality trials are still needed to confirm these findings. |
format |
article |
author |
Jianyu You Jing Ye Haiyan Li Wenguo Ye Ensi Hong |
author_facet |
Jianyu You Jing Ye Haiyan Li Wenguo Ye Ensi Hong |
author_sort |
Jianyu You |
title |
Moxibustion for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short |
Moxibustion for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full |
Moxibustion for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Moxibustion for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Moxibustion for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort |
moxibustion for chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/9590da2638a94a0bb55b7cc5f8888776 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jianyuyou moxibustionforchronicfatiguesyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jingye moxibustionforchronicfatiguesyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT haiyanli moxibustionforchronicfatiguesyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wenguoye moxibustionforchronicfatiguesyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ensihong moxibustionforchronicfatiguesyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1718418356347863040 |