Effects of very low volume high intensity versus moderate intensity interval training in obese metabolic syndrome patients: a randomized controlled study

Abstract Physical activity is a cornerstone in the treatment of obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS). Given the leading physical activity barrier of time commitment and safety concerns about vigorous exercise in high-risk groups, this study aimed to investigate the effects of two extremely time-eff...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dejan Reljic, Fabienne Frenk, Hans J. Herrmann, Markus F. Neurath, Yurdagül Zopf
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/95a7b9d3b1b64cc28d18d7bdc8b99715
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:95a7b9d3b1b64cc28d18d7bdc8b99715
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:95a7b9d3b1b64cc28d18d7bdc8b997152021-12-02T10:44:08ZEffects of very low volume high intensity versus moderate intensity interval training in obese metabolic syndrome patients: a randomized controlled study10.1038/s41598-021-82372-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/95a7b9d3b1b64cc28d18d7bdc8b997152021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82372-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Physical activity is a cornerstone in the treatment of obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS). Given the leading physical activity barrier of time commitment and safety concerns about vigorous exercise in high-risk groups, this study aimed to investigate the effects of two extremely time-efficient training protocols (< 30 min time effort per week), either performed as high- (HIIT) or moderate-intensity interval training (MIIT) over 12 weeks, in obese MetS patients. In total, 117 patients (49.8 ± 13.6 years, BMI: 38.2 ± 6.2 kg/m2) were randomized to HIIT (n = 40), MIIT (n = 37) or an inactive control group (n = 40). All groups received nutritional counseling to support weight loss. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), MetS severity (MetS z-score), body composition and quality of life (QoL) were assessed pre-and post-intervention. All groups significantly reduced body weight (~ 3%) but only the exercise groups improved VO2max, MetS z-score and QoL. VO2max (HIIT: + 3.1 mL/kg/min, p < 0.001; MIIT: + 1.2 mL/kg/min, p < 0.05) and MetS z-score (HIIT: − 1.8 units, p < 0.001; MIIT: − 1.2 units, p < 0.01) improved in an exercise intensity-dependent manner. In conclusion, extremely low-volume interval training, even when done at moderate intensity, is sufficiently effective to improve cardiometabolic health in obese MetS patients. These findings underpin the crucial role of exercise in the treatment of obesity and MetS.Dejan ReljicFabienne FrenkHans J. HerrmannMarkus F. NeurathYurdagül ZopfNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Dejan Reljic
Fabienne Frenk
Hans J. Herrmann
Markus F. Neurath
Yurdagül Zopf
Effects of very low volume high intensity versus moderate intensity interval training in obese metabolic syndrome patients: a randomized controlled study
description Abstract Physical activity is a cornerstone in the treatment of obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS). Given the leading physical activity barrier of time commitment and safety concerns about vigorous exercise in high-risk groups, this study aimed to investigate the effects of two extremely time-efficient training protocols (< 30 min time effort per week), either performed as high- (HIIT) or moderate-intensity interval training (MIIT) over 12 weeks, in obese MetS patients. In total, 117 patients (49.8 ± 13.6 years, BMI: 38.2 ± 6.2 kg/m2) were randomized to HIIT (n = 40), MIIT (n = 37) or an inactive control group (n = 40). All groups received nutritional counseling to support weight loss. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), MetS severity (MetS z-score), body composition and quality of life (QoL) were assessed pre-and post-intervention. All groups significantly reduced body weight (~ 3%) but only the exercise groups improved VO2max, MetS z-score and QoL. VO2max (HIIT: + 3.1 mL/kg/min, p < 0.001; MIIT: + 1.2 mL/kg/min, p < 0.05) and MetS z-score (HIIT: − 1.8 units, p < 0.001; MIIT: − 1.2 units, p < 0.01) improved in an exercise intensity-dependent manner. In conclusion, extremely low-volume interval training, even when done at moderate intensity, is sufficiently effective to improve cardiometabolic health in obese MetS patients. These findings underpin the crucial role of exercise in the treatment of obesity and MetS.
format article
author Dejan Reljic
Fabienne Frenk
Hans J. Herrmann
Markus F. Neurath
Yurdagül Zopf
author_facet Dejan Reljic
Fabienne Frenk
Hans J. Herrmann
Markus F. Neurath
Yurdagül Zopf
author_sort Dejan Reljic
title Effects of very low volume high intensity versus moderate intensity interval training in obese metabolic syndrome patients: a randomized controlled study
title_short Effects of very low volume high intensity versus moderate intensity interval training in obese metabolic syndrome patients: a randomized controlled study
title_full Effects of very low volume high intensity versus moderate intensity interval training in obese metabolic syndrome patients: a randomized controlled study
title_fullStr Effects of very low volume high intensity versus moderate intensity interval training in obese metabolic syndrome patients: a randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of very low volume high intensity versus moderate intensity interval training in obese metabolic syndrome patients: a randomized controlled study
title_sort effects of very low volume high intensity versus moderate intensity interval training in obese metabolic syndrome patients: a randomized controlled study
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/95a7b9d3b1b64cc28d18d7bdc8b99715
work_keys_str_mv AT dejanreljic effectsofverylowvolumehighintensityversusmoderateintensityintervaltraininginobesemetabolicsyndromepatientsarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT fabiennefrenk effectsofverylowvolumehighintensityversusmoderateintensityintervaltraininginobesemetabolicsyndromepatientsarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT hansjherrmann effectsofverylowvolumehighintensityversusmoderateintensityintervaltraininginobesemetabolicsyndromepatientsarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT markusfneurath effectsofverylowvolumehighintensityversusmoderateintensityintervaltraininginobesemetabolicsyndromepatientsarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT yurdagulzopf effectsofverylowvolumehighintensityversusmoderateintensityintervaltraininginobesemetabolicsyndromepatientsarandomizedcontrolledstudy
_version_ 1718396842570416128