The acute effect in performing common range of motion tests in healthy young adults: a prospective study

Abstract In the application of range of motion (ROM) tests there is little agreement on the number of repetitions to be measured and the number of preceding warm-up protocols. In stretch training a plateau in ROM gains can be seen after four to five repetitions. With increasing number of repetitions...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: F. Holzgreve, C. Maurer-Grubinger, J. Isaak, P. Kokott, M. Mörl-Kreitschmann, L. Polte, A. Solimann, L. Wessler, N. Filmann, A. van Mark, L. Maltry, D. A. Groneberg, D. Ohlendorf
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/95ae9f6e36a74c8bb527416d49ab78df
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:95ae9f6e36a74c8bb527416d49ab78df
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:95ae9f6e36a74c8bb527416d49ab78df2021-12-02T16:18:05ZThe acute effect in performing common range of motion tests in healthy young adults: a prospective study10.1038/s41598-020-78846-62045-2322https://doaj.org/article/95ae9f6e36a74c8bb527416d49ab78df2020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78846-6https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract In the application of range of motion (ROM) tests there is little agreement on the number of repetitions to be measured and the number of preceding warm-up protocols. In stretch training a plateau in ROM gains can be seen after four to five repetitions. With increasing number of repetitions, the gain in ROM is reduced. This study examines the question of whether such an effect occurs in common ROM tests. Twenty-two healthy sport students (10 m/12 f.) with an average age of 25.3 ± 1.94 years (average height 174.1 ± 9.8 cm; weight 66.6 ± 11.3 kg and BMI 21.9 ± 2.0 kg/cm2) volunteered in this study. Each subject performed five ROM tests in a randomized order—measured either via a tape measure or a digital inclinometer: Tape measure was used to evaluate the Fingertip-to-Floor test (FtF) and the Lateral Inclination test (LI). Retroflexion of the trunk modified after Janda (RF), Thomas test (TT) and a Shoulder test modified after Janda (ST) were evaluated with a digital inclinometer. In order to show general acute effects within 20 repetitions we performed ANOVA/Friedman-test with multiple comparisons. A non-linear regression was then performed to identify a plateau formation. Significance level was set at 5%. In seven out of eight ROM tests (five tests in total with three tests measured both left and right sides) significant flexibility gains were observed (FtF: p < 0.001; LI-left/right: p < 0.001/0.001; RF: p = 0.009; ST-left/right: p < 0.001/p = 0.003; TT-left: p < 0.001). A non-linear regression with random effects was successfully applied on FtF, RF, LI-left/right, ST-left and TT-left and thus, indicate a gradual decline in the amount of gained ROM. An acute effect was observed in most ROM tests, which is characterized by a gradual decline of ROM gain. For those tests, we can state that the acute effect described in the stretching literature also applies to the performance of typical ROM tests. Since a non-linear behavior was shown, it is the decision of the practitioner to weigh up between measurement accuracy and expenditure. Researchers and practitioners should consider this when applying ROM assessments to healthy young adults.F. HolzgreveC. Maurer-GrubingerJ. IsaakP. KokottM. Mörl-KreitschmannL. PolteA. SolimannL. WesslerN. FilmannA. van MarkL. MaltryD. A. GronebergD. OhlendorfNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
F. Holzgreve
C. Maurer-Grubinger
J. Isaak
P. Kokott
M. Mörl-Kreitschmann
L. Polte
A. Solimann
L. Wessler
N. Filmann
A. van Mark
L. Maltry
D. A. Groneberg
D. Ohlendorf
The acute effect in performing common range of motion tests in healthy young adults: a prospective study
description Abstract In the application of range of motion (ROM) tests there is little agreement on the number of repetitions to be measured and the number of preceding warm-up protocols. In stretch training a plateau in ROM gains can be seen after four to five repetitions. With increasing number of repetitions, the gain in ROM is reduced. This study examines the question of whether such an effect occurs in common ROM tests. Twenty-two healthy sport students (10 m/12 f.) with an average age of 25.3 ± 1.94 years (average height 174.1 ± 9.8 cm; weight 66.6 ± 11.3 kg and BMI 21.9 ± 2.0 kg/cm2) volunteered in this study. Each subject performed five ROM tests in a randomized order—measured either via a tape measure or a digital inclinometer: Tape measure was used to evaluate the Fingertip-to-Floor test (FtF) and the Lateral Inclination test (LI). Retroflexion of the trunk modified after Janda (RF), Thomas test (TT) and a Shoulder test modified after Janda (ST) were evaluated with a digital inclinometer. In order to show general acute effects within 20 repetitions we performed ANOVA/Friedman-test with multiple comparisons. A non-linear regression was then performed to identify a plateau formation. Significance level was set at 5%. In seven out of eight ROM tests (five tests in total with three tests measured both left and right sides) significant flexibility gains were observed (FtF: p < 0.001; LI-left/right: p < 0.001/0.001; RF: p = 0.009; ST-left/right: p < 0.001/p = 0.003; TT-left: p < 0.001). A non-linear regression with random effects was successfully applied on FtF, RF, LI-left/right, ST-left and TT-left and thus, indicate a gradual decline in the amount of gained ROM. An acute effect was observed in most ROM tests, which is characterized by a gradual decline of ROM gain. For those tests, we can state that the acute effect described in the stretching literature also applies to the performance of typical ROM tests. Since a non-linear behavior was shown, it is the decision of the practitioner to weigh up between measurement accuracy and expenditure. Researchers and practitioners should consider this when applying ROM assessments to healthy young adults.
format article
author F. Holzgreve
C. Maurer-Grubinger
J. Isaak
P. Kokott
M. Mörl-Kreitschmann
L. Polte
A. Solimann
L. Wessler
N. Filmann
A. van Mark
L. Maltry
D. A. Groneberg
D. Ohlendorf
author_facet F. Holzgreve
C. Maurer-Grubinger
J. Isaak
P. Kokott
M. Mörl-Kreitschmann
L. Polte
A. Solimann
L. Wessler
N. Filmann
A. van Mark
L. Maltry
D. A. Groneberg
D. Ohlendorf
author_sort F. Holzgreve
title The acute effect in performing common range of motion tests in healthy young adults: a prospective study
title_short The acute effect in performing common range of motion tests in healthy young adults: a prospective study
title_full The acute effect in performing common range of motion tests in healthy young adults: a prospective study
title_fullStr The acute effect in performing common range of motion tests in healthy young adults: a prospective study
title_full_unstemmed The acute effect in performing common range of motion tests in healthy young adults: a prospective study
title_sort acute effect in performing common range of motion tests in healthy young adults: a prospective study
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/95ae9f6e36a74c8bb527416d49ab78df
work_keys_str_mv AT fholzgreve theacuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT cmaurergrubinger theacuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT jisaak theacuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT pkokott theacuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT mmorlkreitschmann theacuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT lpolte theacuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT asolimann theacuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT lwessler theacuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT nfilmann theacuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT avanmark theacuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT lmaltry theacuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT dagroneberg theacuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT dohlendorf theacuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT fholzgreve acuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT cmaurergrubinger acuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT jisaak acuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT pkokott acuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT mmorlkreitschmann acuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT lpolte acuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT asolimann acuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT lwessler acuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT nfilmann acuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT avanmark acuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT lmaltry acuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT dagroneberg acuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
AT dohlendorf acuteeffectinperformingcommonrangeofmotiontestsinhealthyyoungadultsaprospectivestudy
_version_ 1718384185950863360