‘Four Worlds’ news values revisited: A deliberative journalism paradigm for Pacific media

South Pacific media face a challenge of developing forms of journalism that contribute to the national ethos by mobilising change from passive communities to those seeking change. Instead of the news values that have often led international media to exclude a range of perspectives, such a notion wou...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	David Robie
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Asia Pacific Network 2013
Materias:	Deliberative journalism Democracy Models of democracy Freedom of information Freedom of speech Press freedom Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/95be71aba7ac4f519c93b875afe3411b
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:95be71aba7ac4f519c93b875afe3411b
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:95be71aba7ac4f519c93b875afe3411b2021-12-02T10:24:52Z‘Four Worlds’ news values revisited: A deliberative journalism paradigm for Pacific media10.24135/pjr.v19i1.2401023-94992324-2035https://doaj.org/article/95be71aba7ac4f519c93b875afe3411b2013-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/240https://doaj.org/toc/1023-9499https://doaj.org/toc/2324-2035South Pacific media face a challenge of developing forms of journalism that contribute to the national ethos by mobilising change from passive communities to those seeking change. Instead of the news values that have often led international media to exclude a range of perspectives, such a notion would promote deliberation by journalists to enable the participation of all community stakeholders, ‘including the minorities, the marginalised, the disadvantaged and even those deemed as “deviant’” (Romano, 2010). Critical deliberative journalism is issue-based and includes diverse and even unpopular views about the community good and encourages an expression of plurality. In a Pacific context, this resonates more with news media in some developed countries that have a free but conflicted press such as in India, Indonesia and the Philippines. This has far more relevance in the Pacific than a monocultural ‘Western’ news model as typified by Australia and New Zealand. Early in the millennium, this author examined notions of the Fourth Estate in the South Pacific. These were applied through a ‘Four Worlds’ news values prism in the global South that included the status of Indigenous minorities in dominant nation states (Robie, 2001, 2004, 2005, 2009b). This article explores how that has been modified over the past decade and its implications for media and democracy in the Pacific.David RobieAsia Pacific NetworkarticleDeliberative journalismDemocracyModels of democracyFreedom of informationFreedom of speechPress freedomCommunication. Mass mediaP87-96Journalism. The periodical press, etc.PN4699-5650ENPacific Journalism Review, Vol 19, Iss 1 (2013)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Deliberative journalism Democracy Models of democracy Freedom of information Freedom of speech Press freedom Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650
spellingShingle	Deliberative journalism Democracy Models of democracy Freedom of information Freedom of speech Press freedom Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650 David Robie ‘Four Worlds’ news values revisited: A deliberative journalism paradigm for Pacific media
description	South Pacific media face a challenge of developing forms of journalism that contribute to the national ethos by mobilising change from passive communities to those seeking change. Instead of the news values that have often led international media to exclude a range of perspectives, such a notion would promote deliberation by journalists to enable the participation of all community stakeholders, ‘including the minorities, the marginalised, the disadvantaged and even those deemed as “deviant’” (Romano, 2010). Critical deliberative journalism is issue-based and includes diverse and even unpopular views about the community good and encourages an expression of plurality. In a Pacific context, this resonates more with news media in some developed countries that have a free but conflicted press such as in India, Indonesia and the Philippines. This has far more relevance in the Pacific than a monocultural ‘Western’ news model as typified by Australia and New Zealand. Early in the millennium, this author examined notions of the Fourth Estate in the South Pacific. These were applied through a ‘Four Worlds’ news values prism in the global South that included the status of Indigenous minorities in dominant nation states (Robie, 2001, 2004, 2005, 2009b). This article explores how that has been modified over the past decade and its implications for media and democracy in the Pacific.
format	article
author	David Robie
author_facet	David Robie
author_sort	David Robie
title	‘Four Worlds’ news values revisited: A deliberative journalism paradigm for Pacific media
title_short	‘Four Worlds’ news values revisited: A deliberative journalism paradigm for Pacific media
title_full	‘Four Worlds’ news values revisited: A deliberative journalism paradigm for Pacific media
title_fullStr	‘Four Worlds’ news values revisited: A deliberative journalism paradigm for Pacific media
title_full_unstemmed	‘Four Worlds’ news values revisited: A deliberative journalism paradigm for Pacific media
title_sort	‘four worlds’ news values revisited: a deliberative journalism paradigm for pacific media
publisher	Asia Pacific Network
publishDate	2013
url	https://doaj.org/article/95be71aba7ac4f519c93b875afe3411b
work_keys_str_mv	AT davidrobie fourworldsnewsvaluesrevisitedadeliberativejournalismparadigmforpacificmedia
_version_	1718397304088559616

‘Four Worlds’ news values revisited: A deliberative journalism paradigm for Pacific media

Ejemplares similares