Neuroprotection by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Rodent Models of Focal Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis

Infarct size is associated with stroke severity in clinical studies, so reducing it has become an important target and research hotspot in the treatment of ischemic stroke. Some preclinical studies have shown transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reduced infarct size and improved neurologic...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiapeng Huang, Kehong Zhao, Ziqi Zhao, Yun Qu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/95c2283409ca4a0a87b936171cf922e7
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:95c2283409ca4a0a87b936171cf922e7
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:95c2283409ca4a0a87b936171cf922e72021-11-30T12:14:28ZNeuroprotection by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Rodent Models of Focal Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis1662-453X10.3389/fnins.2021.761971https://doaj.org/article/95c2283409ca4a0a87b936171cf922e72021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.761971/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/1662-453XInfarct size is associated with stroke severity in clinical studies, so reducing it has become an important target and research hotspot in the treatment of ischemic stroke. Some preclinical studies have shown transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reduced infarct size and improved neurological deficit, but others have not found beneficial effects. Besides, the optimal pattern of tDCS for ischemic stroke remains largely unknown. To shed light on the current circumstance and future research directions, the systematic review evaluated the effect of different tDCS paradigms in reducing infarct size and improving neurological deficit in rodent models of ischemic stroke and assessed the methodological quality of current literature. We searched the MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus from their inception to August 18, 2021, to identify studies evaluating the effects of tDCS in rodent models of ischemic stroke. Eight studies were included, of which seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed cathodal tDCS, rather than anodal tDCS, reduced infarct size mainly measured by tetrazolium chloride and magnetic resonance imaging (standardized mean difference: −1.13; 95% CI: −1.72, −0.53; p = 0.0002) and improved neurological deficit assessed by a modified neurological severity score (standardized mean difference: −2.10; 95% CI: −3.78, −0.42; p = 0.01) in an early stage of focal ischemic stroke in rodent models. Subgroup analyses showed effects of cathodal tDCS on infarct size were not varied by ischemia duration (ischemia for 1, 1.5, and 2 h or permanent ischemia) and anesthesia (involving isoflurane and ketamine). The overall quality of studies included was low, thus the results must be interpreted cautiously. Published studies suggest that cathodal tDCS may be a promising avenue to explore for augmenting rehabilitation from focal ischemic stroke. Considering the methodological limitations, it is unreliable to blindly extrapolate the animal data to the clinical practice. Future research is needed to investigate the mechanism of tDCS in a randomized and blinded fashion in clinically relevant stroke models, such as elderly animals, female animals, and animals with comorbidities, to find an optimal treatment protocol.Jiapeng HuangJiapeng HuangJiapeng HuangKehong ZhaoKehong ZhaoKehong ZhaoZiqi ZhaoZiqi ZhaoZiqi ZhaoYun QuYun QuYun QuFrontiers Media S.A.articletranscranial direct current stimulationischemic strokerodent modelcerebral infarctionmeta-analysisNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571ENFrontiers in Neuroscience, Vol 15 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic transcranial direct current stimulation
ischemic stroke
rodent model
cerebral infarction
meta-analysis
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
spellingShingle transcranial direct current stimulation
ischemic stroke
rodent model
cerebral infarction
meta-analysis
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Jiapeng Huang
Jiapeng Huang
Jiapeng Huang
Kehong Zhao
Kehong Zhao
Kehong Zhao
Ziqi Zhao
Ziqi Zhao
Ziqi Zhao
Yun Qu
Yun Qu
Yun Qu
Neuroprotection by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Rodent Models of Focal Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis
description Infarct size is associated with stroke severity in clinical studies, so reducing it has become an important target and research hotspot in the treatment of ischemic stroke. Some preclinical studies have shown transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reduced infarct size and improved neurological deficit, but others have not found beneficial effects. Besides, the optimal pattern of tDCS for ischemic stroke remains largely unknown. To shed light on the current circumstance and future research directions, the systematic review evaluated the effect of different tDCS paradigms in reducing infarct size and improving neurological deficit in rodent models of ischemic stroke and assessed the methodological quality of current literature. We searched the MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus from their inception to August 18, 2021, to identify studies evaluating the effects of tDCS in rodent models of ischemic stroke. Eight studies were included, of which seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed cathodal tDCS, rather than anodal tDCS, reduced infarct size mainly measured by tetrazolium chloride and magnetic resonance imaging (standardized mean difference: −1.13; 95% CI: −1.72, −0.53; p = 0.0002) and improved neurological deficit assessed by a modified neurological severity score (standardized mean difference: −2.10; 95% CI: −3.78, −0.42; p = 0.01) in an early stage of focal ischemic stroke in rodent models. Subgroup analyses showed effects of cathodal tDCS on infarct size were not varied by ischemia duration (ischemia for 1, 1.5, and 2 h or permanent ischemia) and anesthesia (involving isoflurane and ketamine). The overall quality of studies included was low, thus the results must be interpreted cautiously. Published studies suggest that cathodal tDCS may be a promising avenue to explore for augmenting rehabilitation from focal ischemic stroke. Considering the methodological limitations, it is unreliable to blindly extrapolate the animal data to the clinical practice. Future research is needed to investigate the mechanism of tDCS in a randomized and blinded fashion in clinically relevant stroke models, such as elderly animals, female animals, and animals with comorbidities, to find an optimal treatment protocol.
format article
author Jiapeng Huang
Jiapeng Huang
Jiapeng Huang
Kehong Zhao
Kehong Zhao
Kehong Zhao
Ziqi Zhao
Ziqi Zhao
Ziqi Zhao
Yun Qu
Yun Qu
Yun Qu
author_facet Jiapeng Huang
Jiapeng Huang
Jiapeng Huang
Kehong Zhao
Kehong Zhao
Kehong Zhao
Ziqi Zhao
Ziqi Zhao
Ziqi Zhao
Yun Qu
Yun Qu
Yun Qu
author_sort Jiapeng Huang
title Neuroprotection by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Rodent Models of Focal Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Neuroprotection by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Rodent Models of Focal Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Neuroprotection by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Rodent Models of Focal Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Neuroprotection by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Rodent Models of Focal Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Neuroprotection by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Rodent Models of Focal Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort neuroprotection by transcranial direct current stimulation in rodent models of focal ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/95c2283409ca4a0a87b936171cf922e7
work_keys_str_mv AT jiapenghuang neuroprotectionbytranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinrodentmodelsoffocalischemicstrokeametaanalysis
AT jiapenghuang neuroprotectionbytranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinrodentmodelsoffocalischemicstrokeametaanalysis
AT jiapenghuang neuroprotectionbytranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinrodentmodelsoffocalischemicstrokeametaanalysis
AT kehongzhao neuroprotectionbytranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinrodentmodelsoffocalischemicstrokeametaanalysis
AT kehongzhao neuroprotectionbytranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinrodentmodelsoffocalischemicstrokeametaanalysis
AT kehongzhao neuroprotectionbytranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinrodentmodelsoffocalischemicstrokeametaanalysis
AT ziqizhao neuroprotectionbytranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinrodentmodelsoffocalischemicstrokeametaanalysis
AT ziqizhao neuroprotectionbytranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinrodentmodelsoffocalischemicstrokeametaanalysis
AT ziqizhao neuroprotectionbytranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinrodentmodelsoffocalischemicstrokeametaanalysis
AT yunqu neuroprotectionbytranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinrodentmodelsoffocalischemicstrokeametaanalysis
AT yunqu neuroprotectionbytranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinrodentmodelsoffocalischemicstrokeametaanalysis
AT yunqu neuroprotectionbytranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinrodentmodelsoffocalischemicstrokeametaanalysis
_version_ 1718406636936101888