Self-management interventions for adults with stroke: A scoping review

Background: Stroke is a principal cause of mortality and disability globally. Numerous studies have contributed to the knowledge base regarding self-management interventions among chronic disease patients, but there are few such studies for patients with stroke. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suebsarn Ruksakulpiwat, Wendie Zhou
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/961d6993a51d4c88bb7d2b9ec7db4f59
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:961d6993a51d4c88bb7d2b9ec7db4f59
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:961d6993a51d4c88bb7d2b9ec7db4f592021-12-02T18:51:56ZSelf-management interventions for adults with stroke: A scoping review2095-882X10.1016/j.cdtm.2021.03.001https://doaj.org/article/961d6993a51d4c88bb7d2b9ec7db4f592021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095882X21000220https://doaj.org/toc/2095-882XBackground: Stroke is a principal cause of mortality and disability globally. Numerous studies have contributed to the knowledge base regarding self-management interventions among chronic disease patients, but there are few such studies for patients with stroke. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze self-management interventions among stroke patients. This scoping review aimed to systematically identify and describe randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of self-management interventions for adults with stroke. Methods: A review team carried out a scoping review on stroke and self-management interventions based on the methodology of Arksey and O'Malley, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL Plus Full Text, Medline Plus Full Text, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to July 2020. Results: Fifty-four RCTs were included. The most popular study design is comparing a self-management intervention to usual care or waitlist control condition. Physical activity is the most common intervention topic, and interventions were mainly delivered face to face. The majority of interventions were located in inpatient and multiple settings. Interventions were conducted by various providers, with nurses the most common provider group. Symptom management was the most frequently reported outcome domain that improved. Conclusions: Self-management interventions benefit the symptom management of stroke patients a lot. The reasonable time for intervention is at least 6–12 months. Multifarious intervention topics, delivery formats, and providers are adopted mostly to meet the multiple needs of this population. Physical activity was the most popular topic currently. Studies comparing the effect of different types of self-management interventions are required in the future.Suebsarn RuksakulpiwatWendie ZhouKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.articleSelf managementInterventionStrokeMedicine (General)R5-920ENChronic Diseases and Translational Medicine, Vol 7, Iss 3, Pp 139-148 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Self management
Intervention
Stroke
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle Self management
Intervention
Stroke
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Suebsarn Ruksakulpiwat
Wendie Zhou
Self-management interventions for adults with stroke: A scoping review
description Background: Stroke is a principal cause of mortality and disability globally. Numerous studies have contributed to the knowledge base regarding self-management interventions among chronic disease patients, but there are few such studies for patients with stroke. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze self-management interventions among stroke patients. This scoping review aimed to systematically identify and describe randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of self-management interventions for adults with stroke. Methods: A review team carried out a scoping review on stroke and self-management interventions based on the methodology of Arksey and O'Malley, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL Plus Full Text, Medline Plus Full Text, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to July 2020. Results: Fifty-four RCTs were included. The most popular study design is comparing a self-management intervention to usual care or waitlist control condition. Physical activity is the most common intervention topic, and interventions were mainly delivered face to face. The majority of interventions were located in inpatient and multiple settings. Interventions were conducted by various providers, with nurses the most common provider group. Symptom management was the most frequently reported outcome domain that improved. Conclusions: Self-management interventions benefit the symptom management of stroke patients a lot. The reasonable time for intervention is at least 6–12 months. Multifarious intervention topics, delivery formats, and providers are adopted mostly to meet the multiple needs of this population. Physical activity was the most popular topic currently. Studies comparing the effect of different types of self-management interventions are required in the future.
format article
author Suebsarn Ruksakulpiwat
Wendie Zhou
author_facet Suebsarn Ruksakulpiwat
Wendie Zhou
author_sort Suebsarn Ruksakulpiwat
title Self-management interventions for adults with stroke: A scoping review
title_short Self-management interventions for adults with stroke: A scoping review
title_full Self-management interventions for adults with stroke: A scoping review
title_fullStr Self-management interventions for adults with stroke: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Self-management interventions for adults with stroke: A scoping review
title_sort self-management interventions for adults with stroke: a scoping review
publisher KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/961d6993a51d4c88bb7d2b9ec7db4f59
work_keys_str_mv AT suebsarnruksakulpiwat selfmanagementinterventionsforadultswithstrokeascopingreview
AT wendiezhou selfmanagementinterventionsforadultswithstrokeascopingreview
_version_ 1718377398171336704