Cellular entry of nanoparticles via serum sensitive clathrin-mediated endocytosis, and plasma membrane permeabilization [Corrigendum]

Corrigendum  Smith PJ, Giroud M, Wiggins HL, et al. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:2045–2055.Page 2054, Figure 11, the text “Average no of NPs in lumen: Nf =2.1×10-3” should read “Average no of NPs in lumen:Nf =2.1×10-2”.&...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith PJ, Giroud M, Wiggins HL, Gower F, Thorley JA, Stolpe B, Mazzolini J, Dyson RJ, Rappoport JZ
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9677ec630cb24357b676bbce385c16ed
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9677ec630cb24357b676bbce385c16ed
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9677ec630cb24357b676bbce385c16ed2021-12-02T02:43:43ZCellular entry of nanoparticles via serum sensitive clathrin-mediated endocytosis, and plasma membrane permeabilization [Corrigendum]1178-2013https://doaj.org/article/9677ec630cb24357b676bbce385c16ed2015-06-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/corrigendum-cellular-entry-of-nanoparticles-via-serum-sensitive-c-peer-reviewed-article-IJNhttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-2013Corrigendum  Smith PJ, Giroud M, Wiggins HL, et al. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:2045–2055.Page 2054, Figure 11, the text “Average no of NPs in lumen: Nf =2.1×10-3” should read “Average no of NPs in lumen:Nf =2.1×10-2”. Page 2054, Figure 11, the figure legend “Figure 11 A series of calculations to estimate the number of nanoparticles that could enter a vesicle under the incubation conditions described in materials and methods. It is estimated that nanoparticles are nearly 25,000 times more likely to enter cells when they are bound to the membrane than in the fluid phase.” should read “Figure 11 A series of calculations to estimate the number of nanoparticles that could enter a vesicle under the incubation conditions described in materials and methods. It is estimated that nanoparticles are nearly 2,500 times more likely to enter cells when they are bound to the membrane than in the fluid phase.” Page 2054, first column, line 13, the sentence “Even though the latter might be an overestimation, the current analyses suggest that under these conditions nanoparticles are nearly 25,000 times more likely to enter cells bound to the inner membrane of a vesicle than through the fluid phase.” should read “Even though the latter might be an overestimation, the current analyses suggest that under these conditions nanoparticles are nearly 2,500 times more likely to enter cells bound to the inner membrane of a vesicle than through the fluid phase”.Read the original articleSmith PJGiroud MWiggins HLGower FThorley JAStolpe BMazzolini JDyson RJRappoport JZDove Medical PressarticleMedicine (General)R5-920ENInternational Journal of Nanomedicine, Vol 2015, Iss default, Pp 3987-3988 (2015)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle Medicine (General)
R5-920
Smith PJ
Giroud M
Wiggins HL
Gower F
Thorley JA
Stolpe B
Mazzolini J
Dyson RJ
Rappoport JZ
Cellular entry of nanoparticles via serum sensitive clathrin-mediated endocytosis, and plasma membrane permeabilization [Corrigendum]
description Corrigendum  Smith PJ, Giroud M, Wiggins HL, et al. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:2045–2055.Page 2054, Figure 11, the text “Average no of NPs in lumen: Nf =2.1×10-3” should read “Average no of NPs in lumen:Nf =2.1×10-2”. Page 2054, Figure 11, the figure legend “Figure 11 A series of calculations to estimate the number of nanoparticles that could enter a vesicle under the incubation conditions described in materials and methods. It is estimated that nanoparticles are nearly 25,000 times more likely to enter cells when they are bound to the membrane than in the fluid phase.” should read “Figure 11 A series of calculations to estimate the number of nanoparticles that could enter a vesicle under the incubation conditions described in materials and methods. It is estimated that nanoparticles are nearly 2,500 times more likely to enter cells when they are bound to the membrane than in the fluid phase.” Page 2054, first column, line 13, the sentence “Even though the latter might be an overestimation, the current analyses suggest that under these conditions nanoparticles are nearly 25,000 times more likely to enter cells bound to the inner membrane of a vesicle than through the fluid phase.” should read “Even though the latter might be an overestimation, the current analyses suggest that under these conditions nanoparticles are nearly 2,500 times more likely to enter cells bound to the inner membrane of a vesicle than through the fluid phase”.Read the original article
format article
author Smith PJ
Giroud M
Wiggins HL
Gower F
Thorley JA
Stolpe B
Mazzolini J
Dyson RJ
Rappoport JZ
author_facet Smith PJ
Giroud M
Wiggins HL
Gower F
Thorley JA
Stolpe B
Mazzolini J
Dyson RJ
Rappoport JZ
author_sort Smith PJ
title Cellular entry of nanoparticles via serum sensitive clathrin-mediated endocytosis, and plasma membrane permeabilization [Corrigendum]
title_short Cellular entry of nanoparticles via serum sensitive clathrin-mediated endocytosis, and plasma membrane permeabilization [Corrigendum]
title_full Cellular entry of nanoparticles via serum sensitive clathrin-mediated endocytosis, and plasma membrane permeabilization [Corrigendum]
title_fullStr Cellular entry of nanoparticles via serum sensitive clathrin-mediated endocytosis, and plasma membrane permeabilization [Corrigendum]
title_full_unstemmed Cellular entry of nanoparticles via serum sensitive clathrin-mediated endocytosis, and plasma membrane permeabilization [Corrigendum]
title_sort cellular entry of nanoparticles via serum sensitive clathrin-mediated endocytosis, and plasma membrane permeabilization [corrigendum]
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2015
url https://doaj.org/article/9677ec630cb24357b676bbce385c16ed
work_keys_str_mv AT smithpj cellularentryofnanoparticlesviaserumsensitiveclathrinmediatedendocytosisandplasmamembranepermeabilizationcorrigendum
AT giroudm cellularentryofnanoparticlesviaserumsensitiveclathrinmediatedendocytosisandplasmamembranepermeabilizationcorrigendum
AT wigginshl cellularentryofnanoparticlesviaserumsensitiveclathrinmediatedendocytosisandplasmamembranepermeabilizationcorrigendum
AT gowerf cellularentryofnanoparticlesviaserumsensitiveclathrinmediatedendocytosisandplasmamembranepermeabilizationcorrigendum
AT thorleyja cellularentryofnanoparticlesviaserumsensitiveclathrinmediatedendocytosisandplasmamembranepermeabilizationcorrigendum
AT stolpeb cellularentryofnanoparticlesviaserumsensitiveclathrinmediatedendocytosisandplasmamembranepermeabilizationcorrigendum
AT mazzolinij cellularentryofnanoparticlesviaserumsensitiveclathrinmediatedendocytosisandplasmamembranepermeabilizationcorrigendum
AT dysonrj cellularentryofnanoparticlesviaserumsensitiveclathrinmediatedendocytosisandplasmamembranepermeabilizationcorrigendum
AT rappoportjz cellularentryofnanoparticlesviaserumsensitiveclathrinmediatedendocytosisandplasmamembranepermeabilizationcorrigendum
_version_ 1718402236419145728