Digital Placemaking for Urban Regeneration: Identification of Historic Heritage Values in Taiwan and the Baltic States
The active use of modern technology has affected the relationship between people and place. The “digital environment” and the “digital community” are becoming an increasingly important factor in people’s daily life, leading to a loss of belonging to a place, an entire neighbourhood, and a community....
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Cogitatio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/967d92cd45314105bf974a9ab99bb04a |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:967d92cd45314105bf974a9ab99bb04a |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:967d92cd45314105bf974a9ab99bb04a2021-11-17T10:06:45ZDigital Placemaking for Urban Regeneration: Identification of Historic Heritage Values in Taiwan and the Baltic States2183-763510.17645/up.v6i4.4406https://doaj.org/article/967d92cd45314105bf974a9ab99bb04a2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4406https://doaj.org/toc/2183-7635The active use of modern technology has affected the relationship between people and place. The “digital environment” and the “digital community” are becoming an increasingly important factor in people’s daily life, leading to a loss of belonging to a place, an entire neighbourhood, and a community. In the long run, this poses risks to the unification of values and the loss of identity. In this context, the involvement of the local community in the identification and preservation of historical heritage and defining the specific values of each site is particularly important. Thus, both the attraction of the local community to specific places and the revealed potential of local tourism are promoted. Digital placemaking enters urban regeneration as a logical approach to mixing digital and physical environments and involving the local community. Several GIS-based platforms and other tools are used to identify heritage values, both tangible and intangible. Although digital placemaking is emerging worldwide, its manifestations are closely related to specific local circumstances. The article focuses on the key characteristics and configurations of the digital placemaking tools within particular communities. The study tests digital placemaking practice in the historical districts of three cities: Taipei (Taiwan), Riga (Latvia), and Kaunas (Lithuania).Chih-ming ShihSandra TreijaKęstutis ZaleckisUģis BratuškinsChi-Hui ChenYen-Hung ChenCharles Tzu Wei ChiangLaura Jankauskaitė-JurevičienėJūratė KamičaitytėAlisa KoroļovaHuei-Chen LeeArnis LektauersAušra MlinkauskienėCogitatioarticlebaltic statesdigital placemakingheritage valuespublic involvementtaiwanurban regenerationCity planningHT165.5-169.9ENUrban Planning, Vol 6, Iss 4 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
baltic states digital placemaking heritage values public involvement taiwan urban regeneration City planning HT165.5-169.9 |
spellingShingle |
baltic states digital placemaking heritage values public involvement taiwan urban regeneration City planning HT165.5-169.9 Chih-ming Shih Sandra Treija Kęstutis Zaleckis Uģis Bratuškins Chi-Hui Chen Yen-Hung Chen Charles Tzu Wei Chiang Laura Jankauskaitė-Jurevičienė Jūratė Kamičaitytė Alisa Koroļova Huei-Chen Lee Arnis Lektauers Aušra Mlinkauskienė Digital Placemaking for Urban Regeneration: Identification of Historic Heritage Values in Taiwan and the Baltic States |
description |
The active use of modern technology has affected the relationship between people and place. The “digital environment” and the “digital community” are becoming an increasingly important factor in people’s daily life, leading to a loss of belonging to a place, an entire neighbourhood, and a community. In the long run, this poses risks to the unification of values and the loss of identity. In this context, the involvement of the local community in the identification and preservation of historical heritage and defining the specific values of each site is particularly important. Thus, both the attraction of the local community to specific places and the revealed potential of local tourism are promoted. Digital placemaking enters urban regeneration as a logical approach to mixing digital and physical environments and involving the local community. Several GIS-based platforms and other tools are used to identify heritage values, both tangible and intangible. Although digital placemaking is emerging worldwide, its manifestations are closely related to specific local circumstances. The article focuses on the key characteristics and configurations of the digital placemaking tools within particular communities. The study tests digital placemaking practice in the historical districts of three cities: Taipei (Taiwan), Riga (Latvia), and Kaunas (Lithuania). |
format |
article |
author |
Chih-ming Shih Sandra Treija Kęstutis Zaleckis Uģis Bratuškins Chi-Hui Chen Yen-Hung Chen Charles Tzu Wei Chiang Laura Jankauskaitė-Jurevičienė Jūratė Kamičaitytė Alisa Koroļova Huei-Chen Lee Arnis Lektauers Aušra Mlinkauskienė |
author_facet |
Chih-ming Shih Sandra Treija Kęstutis Zaleckis Uģis Bratuškins Chi-Hui Chen Yen-Hung Chen Charles Tzu Wei Chiang Laura Jankauskaitė-Jurevičienė Jūratė Kamičaitytė Alisa Koroļova Huei-Chen Lee Arnis Lektauers Aušra Mlinkauskienė |
author_sort |
Chih-ming Shih |
title |
Digital Placemaking for Urban Regeneration: Identification of Historic Heritage Values in Taiwan and the Baltic States |
title_short |
Digital Placemaking for Urban Regeneration: Identification of Historic Heritage Values in Taiwan and the Baltic States |
title_full |
Digital Placemaking for Urban Regeneration: Identification of Historic Heritage Values in Taiwan and the Baltic States |
title_fullStr |
Digital Placemaking for Urban Regeneration: Identification of Historic Heritage Values in Taiwan and the Baltic States |
title_full_unstemmed |
Digital Placemaking for Urban Regeneration: Identification of Historic Heritage Values in Taiwan and the Baltic States |
title_sort |
digital placemaking for urban regeneration: identification of historic heritage values in taiwan and the baltic states |
publisher |
Cogitatio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/967d92cd45314105bf974a9ab99bb04a |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chihmingshih digitalplacemakingforurbanregenerationidentificationofhistoricheritagevaluesintaiwanandthebalticstates AT sandratreija digitalplacemakingforurbanregenerationidentificationofhistoricheritagevaluesintaiwanandthebalticstates AT kestutiszaleckis digitalplacemakingforurbanregenerationidentificationofhistoricheritagevaluesintaiwanandthebalticstates AT ugisbratuskins digitalplacemakingforurbanregenerationidentificationofhistoricheritagevaluesintaiwanandthebalticstates AT chihuichen digitalplacemakingforurbanregenerationidentificationofhistoricheritagevaluesintaiwanandthebalticstates AT yenhungchen digitalplacemakingforurbanregenerationidentificationofhistoricheritagevaluesintaiwanandthebalticstates AT charlestzuweichiang digitalplacemakingforurbanregenerationidentificationofhistoricheritagevaluesintaiwanandthebalticstates AT laurajankauskaitejureviciene digitalplacemakingforurbanregenerationidentificationofhistoricheritagevaluesintaiwanandthebalticstates AT juratekamicaityte digitalplacemakingforurbanregenerationidentificationofhistoricheritagevaluesintaiwanandthebalticstates AT alisakorolova digitalplacemakingforurbanregenerationidentificationofhistoricheritagevaluesintaiwanandthebalticstates AT hueichenlee digitalplacemakingforurbanregenerationidentificationofhistoricheritagevaluesintaiwanandthebalticstates AT arnislektauers digitalplacemakingforurbanregenerationidentificationofhistoricheritagevaluesintaiwanandthebalticstates AT ausramlinkauskiene digitalplacemakingforurbanregenerationidentificationofhistoricheritagevaluesintaiwanandthebalticstates |
_version_ |
1718425626281508864 |