Comparison of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and hysteroscopic myomectomy for submucosal fibroids: a retrospective study

Objective To compare the safety, reintervention and pregnancy outcomes between ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) and hysteroscopic myomectomy (HM) for submucosal fibroids. Materials and methods A total of 215 patients with a solitary submucosal fibroid treated by USgHIFU...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Waixing Li, Zhipeng Yang, Bingsi Gao, Lingxiao Zou, Dabao Xu, Lu Liu, Pan Gu, Xinliang Deng
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Taylor & Francis Group 2021
Materias:	ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (usghifu) submucosal fibroids reintervention rate hysteroscopic myomectomy (hm) pregnancy Medical technology R855-855.5
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/96dc016715f3424cb4b6612f08b5c4ee
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:96dc016715f3424cb4b6612f08b5c4ee
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:96dc016715f3424cb4b6612f08b5c4ee2021-11-17T14:21:55ZComparison of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and hysteroscopic myomectomy for submucosal fibroids: a retrospective study0265-67361464-515710.1080/02656736.2021.1995053https://doaj.org/article/96dc016715f3424cb4b6612f08b5c4ee2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2021.1995053https://doaj.org/toc/0265-6736https://doaj.org/toc/1464-5157Objective To compare the safety, reintervention and pregnancy outcomes between ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) and hysteroscopic myomectomy (HM) for submucosal fibroids. Materials and methods A total of 215 patients with a solitary submucosal fibroid treated by USgHIFU or HM at the third Xiangya Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 58 treated with USgHIFU, 157 treated with HM. Results A significant difference was observed in size, location and type of the fibroids, effective rate, and cumulative reintervention rate between the two groups (p < .05). The size of the fibroids was 57.9 ± 1.9 mm in the USgHIFU group, while it was 32.6 ± 1.2 mm in the HM group. The number of the fibroids at horn or fundus/uterine cavity was 16/42 in the USgHIFU group, while it was 21/136 in the HM group. The number of type I/II/2–5 was 16/17/25 in the USgHIFU group, while it was 133/24/0 in the HM group. In the USgHIFU group, the effective rate was 100% and the cumulative reintervention rate at 50 (17–97) months was 19.0%, while in the HM group, it was 94.3% and 7.6%, respectively. During the follow-up period, the pregnancy rate was 22.4% (13/58) and the reintervention rate due to invalid and recurrence was 15.5% (9/58) in the USgHIFU group, while they were 18.5% (29/157) and 7.0% (11/157) in the HM group. No significant difference was observed between the two groups (p > .05). Furthermore, the reintervention rate was positively correlated with age, treatment methods and parity and fertility requirements. No other significant difference was observed between the two groups. Conclusions Both USgHIFU and HM are safe and effective in treating submucosal fibroids. Compared with the HM group, the USgHIFU group had lower postoperative complications, but higher reintervention rate, with similar recurrence rate, pregnancy rate and reintervention rate due to invalid and recurrence. Reintervention was related to age, treatment methods, parity and fertility requirements.Waixing LiZhipeng YangBingsi GaoLingxiao ZouDabao XuLu LiuPan GuXinliang DengTaylor & Francis Grouparticleultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (usghifu)submucosal fibroidsreintervention ratehysteroscopic myomectomy (hm)pregnancyMedical technologyR855-855.5ENInternational Journal of Hyperthermia, Vol 38, Iss 1, Pp 1609-1616 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (usghifu) submucosal fibroids reintervention rate hysteroscopic myomectomy (hm) pregnancy Medical technology R855-855.5
spellingShingle	ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (usghifu) submucosal fibroids reintervention rate hysteroscopic myomectomy (hm) pregnancy Medical technology R855-855.5 Waixing Li Zhipeng Yang Bingsi Gao Lingxiao Zou Dabao Xu Lu Liu Pan Gu Xinliang Deng Comparison of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and hysteroscopic myomectomy for submucosal fibroids: a retrospective study
description	Objective To compare the safety, reintervention and pregnancy outcomes between ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) and hysteroscopic myomectomy (HM) for submucosal fibroids. Materials and methods A total of 215 patients with a solitary submucosal fibroid treated by USgHIFU or HM at the third Xiangya Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 58 treated with USgHIFU, 157 treated with HM. Results A significant difference was observed in size, location and type of the fibroids, effective rate, and cumulative reintervention rate between the two groups (p < .05). The size of the fibroids was 57.9 ± 1.9 mm in the USgHIFU group, while it was 32.6 ± 1.2 mm in the HM group. The number of the fibroids at horn or fundus/uterine cavity was 16/42 in the USgHIFU group, while it was 21/136 in the HM group. The number of type I/II/2–5 was 16/17/25 in the USgHIFU group, while it was 133/24/0 in the HM group. In the USgHIFU group, the effective rate was 100% and the cumulative reintervention rate at 50 (17–97) months was 19.0%, while in the HM group, it was 94.3% and 7.6%, respectively. During the follow-up period, the pregnancy rate was 22.4% (13/58) and the reintervention rate due to invalid and recurrence was 15.5% (9/58) in the USgHIFU group, while they were 18.5% (29/157) and 7.0% (11/157) in the HM group. No significant difference was observed between the two groups (p > .05). Furthermore, the reintervention rate was positively correlated with age, treatment methods and parity and fertility requirements. No other significant difference was observed between the two groups. Conclusions Both USgHIFU and HM are safe and effective in treating submucosal fibroids. Compared with the HM group, the USgHIFU group had lower postoperative complications, but higher reintervention rate, with similar recurrence rate, pregnancy rate and reintervention rate due to invalid and recurrence. Reintervention was related to age, treatment methods, parity and fertility requirements.
format	article
author	Waixing Li Zhipeng Yang Bingsi Gao Lingxiao Zou Dabao Xu Lu Liu Pan Gu Xinliang Deng
author_facet	Waixing Li Zhipeng Yang Bingsi Gao Lingxiao Zou Dabao Xu Lu Liu Pan Gu Xinliang Deng
author_sort	Waixing Li
title	Comparison of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and hysteroscopic myomectomy for submucosal fibroids: a retrospective study
title_short	Comparison of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and hysteroscopic myomectomy for submucosal fibroids: a retrospective study
title_full	Comparison of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and hysteroscopic myomectomy for submucosal fibroids: a retrospective study
title_fullStr	Comparison of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and hysteroscopic myomectomy for submucosal fibroids: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and hysteroscopic myomectomy for submucosal fibroids: a retrospective study
title_sort	comparison of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and hysteroscopic myomectomy for submucosal fibroids: a retrospective study
publisher	Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/96dc016715f3424cb4b6612f08b5c4ee
work_keys_str_mv	AT waixingli comparisonofultrasoundguidedhighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationandhysteroscopicmyomectomyforsubmucosalfibroidsaretrospectivestudy AT zhipengyang comparisonofultrasoundguidedhighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationandhysteroscopicmyomectomyforsubmucosalfibroidsaretrospectivestudy AT bingsigao comparisonofultrasoundguidedhighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationandhysteroscopicmyomectomyforsubmucosalfibroidsaretrospectivestudy AT lingxiaozou comparisonofultrasoundguidedhighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationandhysteroscopicmyomectomyforsubmucosalfibroidsaretrospectivestudy AT dabaoxu comparisonofultrasoundguidedhighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationandhysteroscopicmyomectomyforsubmucosalfibroidsaretrospectivestudy AT luliu comparisonofultrasoundguidedhighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationandhysteroscopicmyomectomyforsubmucosalfibroidsaretrospectivestudy AT pangu comparisonofultrasoundguidedhighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationandhysteroscopicmyomectomyforsubmucosalfibroidsaretrospectivestudy AT xinliangdeng comparisonofultrasoundguidedhighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationandhysteroscopicmyomectomyforsubmucosalfibroidsaretrospectivestudy
_version_	1718425498067927040

Comparison of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and hysteroscopic myomectomy for submucosal fibroids: a retrospective study

Ejemplares similares