Changing microbiological profile and antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates obtained from patients with infective endocarditis – The time to relook into the therapeutic guidelines
The microbiological profile, associated risk factors and demographic characteristics of patients with IE has changed in the recent times. In the present study, the antibiotic susceptibility profile of 66 isolates (40 from IDU and 26 from non IDU) recovered over a period of three years from the patie...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/9707ec391e99437ea8e9ba9ef0d73683 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | The microbiological profile, associated risk factors and demographic characteristics of patients with IE has changed in the recent times. In the present study, the antibiotic susceptibility profile of 66 isolates (40 from IDU and 26 from non IDU) recovered over a period of three years from the patients with definitive diagnosis of IE along with their absolute minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC-μg/ml) was determined as per CLSI, 2017 guidelines. Staphylococcus aureus was found to be the predominant pathogen associated with IE out of which 90.2% isolates were MRSA, although none of the isolates were found resistant to vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin and linezolid. Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were 100% susceptible to carbapenams, however variable resistance was observed against other antimicrobials. All Enterococci were found to be 100% susceptible to linezolid and daptomycin, whereas vancomycin resistant enterococci phenotype was observed in 25% of the Enterococcal isolates. A noticeable difference in the antimicrobial susceptibility profile and their MICs were observed in the present study, as compared to published literature across the globe and within the country. However, no statistically significant difference (λ 2 test, p > 0.01)in the AST pattern of isolates from IDU vs. Non IDU was observed. After reviewing the local antibiogram it seems that we need to have our own regional guidelines, which may partially replace the currently prevailing AHA/ESC guidelines. |
|---|