Irreproducibility in searches of scientific literature: A comparative analysis
Abstract Repeatability is the cornerstone of science, and it is particularly important for systematic reviews. However, little is known on how researchers’ choice of database, and search platform influence the repeatability of systematic reviews. Here, we aim to unveil how the computer environment a...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Gábor Pozsgai, Gábor L. Lövei, Liette Vasseur, Geoff Gurr, Péter Batáry, János Korponai, Nick A. Littlewood, Jian Liu, Arnold Móra, John Obrycki, Olivia Reynolds, Jenni A. Stockan, Heather VanVolkenburg, Jie Zhang, Wenwu Zhou, Minsheng You |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Wiley
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/974e63d33f5e404dbf0641d64b6fff65 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Accuracy of Resonance Frequency Analysis by Third Generation Osstell®
por: Brizuela-Velasco,Aritza, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Developing a Comprehensive Patent Related Information Retrieval Tool
por: Taduri,Siddharth, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
In vivo Imaging of Retina and Choroid in Guinea Pigs
por: Li Dong, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Development of an efficient search filter to retrieve systematic reviews from PubMed
por: José Antonio Salvador-Oliván, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Highly Reproducible 16S Sequencing Facilitates Measurement of Host Genetic Influences on the Stickleback Gut Microbiome
por: Clayton M. Small, et al.
Publicado: (2019)