Technical Economic and Environmental analysis of Chemical Looping versus oxyfuel combustion for NGCC power plant

The Power Sector is undergoing a rapid technological change with respect to implementation of low carbon technologies. The IEA Energy Outlook 2017 shows that the investments in Renewables for the first time are equal to those on the fossil sources. It is likely that the conventional gas turbines and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Bartocci Pietro, Abad Alberto, Cabello Arturo, Zampilli Mauro, Buia Giulio, Serra Angela, Colantoni Simone, Taiana Andrea, Bidini Gianni, Fantozzi Francesco
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FR
Publicado:	EDP Sciences 2021
Materias:	Environmental sciences GE1-350
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/9756ed41c09e495ea5c8811701bcdae2
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:9756ed41c09e495ea5c8811701bcdae2
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:9756ed41c09e495ea5c8811701bcdae22021-11-08T15:18:54ZTechnical Economic and Environmental analysis of Chemical Looping versus oxyfuel combustion for NGCC power plant2267-124210.1051/e3sconf/202131208019https://doaj.org/article/9756ed41c09e495ea5c8811701bcdae22021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/88/e3sconf_ati2021_08019.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2267-1242The Power Sector is undergoing a rapid technological change with respect to implementation of low carbon technologies. The IEA Energy Outlook 2017 shows that the investments in Renewables for the first time are equal to those on the fossil sources. It is likely that the conventional gas turbines and internal combustion engines will need to be integrated in systems employing biofuels and/or CCUS (Carbon Capture Usage and Storage). Also, the European Union is moving rapidly towards low carbon technologies (i.e. Energy Efficiency, Smart Grids, Renewables and CCUS), see the Energy Union Strategy. Currently 28% of the installed power capacity in Europe is based on natural gas plants. Gas-based power capacity has reached 418 GW in 2016 and is likely to continue to grow in the future. To efficiently capture the carbon dioxide emissions generated by the combustion of natural gas in the combustion chamber a possible solution could be to adopt new combustion processes, like Chemical Looping Combustion. The combination of CLC and GTs can decrease the efficiency of a combined cycle power plant from 60% to about 40.34%. These performances influence costs and environmental burdens and this is also the same for oxyfuel combustion, which is a competing technology to realize CCS. This paper, starting from literature mass and energy balances of a conventional combined cycle, a combined cycle coupled with chemical looping combustor and a combined cycle coupled with oxyfuel combustion, calculates the reduction of CO2 emissions which can be achieved during the whole life cycle of the power plant and then identifies the value of the carbon credit which is needed to have an interesting payback period for such kind of investment.Bartocci PietroAbad AlbertoCabello ArturoZampilli MauroBuia GiulioSerra AngelaColantoni SimoneTaiana AndreaBidini GianniFantozzi FrancescoEDP SciencesarticleEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350ENFRE3S Web of Conferences, Vol 312, p 08019 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR
topic	Environmental sciences GE1-350
spellingShingle	Environmental sciences GE1-350 Bartocci Pietro Abad Alberto Cabello Arturo Zampilli Mauro Buia Giulio Serra Angela Colantoni Simone Taiana Andrea Bidini Gianni Fantozzi Francesco Technical Economic and Environmental analysis of Chemical Looping versus oxyfuel combustion for NGCC power plant
description	The Power Sector is undergoing a rapid technological change with respect to implementation of low carbon technologies. The IEA Energy Outlook 2017 shows that the investments in Renewables for the first time are equal to those on the fossil sources. It is likely that the conventional gas turbines and internal combustion engines will need to be integrated in systems employing biofuels and/or CCUS (Carbon Capture Usage and Storage). Also, the European Union is moving rapidly towards low carbon technologies (i.e. Energy Efficiency, Smart Grids, Renewables and CCUS), see the Energy Union Strategy. Currently 28% of the installed power capacity in Europe is based on natural gas plants. Gas-based power capacity has reached 418 GW in 2016 and is likely to continue to grow in the future. To efficiently capture the carbon dioxide emissions generated by the combustion of natural gas in the combustion chamber a possible solution could be to adopt new combustion processes, like Chemical Looping Combustion. The combination of CLC and GTs can decrease the efficiency of a combined cycle power plant from 60% to about 40.34%. These performances influence costs and environmental burdens and this is also the same for oxyfuel combustion, which is a competing technology to realize CCS. This paper, starting from literature mass and energy balances of a conventional combined cycle, a combined cycle coupled with chemical looping combustor and a combined cycle coupled with oxyfuel combustion, calculates the reduction of CO2 emissions which can be achieved during the whole life cycle of the power plant and then identifies the value of the carbon credit which is needed to have an interesting payback period for such kind of investment.
format	article
author	Bartocci Pietro Abad Alberto Cabello Arturo Zampilli Mauro Buia Giulio Serra Angela Colantoni Simone Taiana Andrea Bidini Gianni Fantozzi Francesco
author_facet	Bartocci Pietro Abad Alberto Cabello Arturo Zampilli Mauro Buia Giulio Serra Angela Colantoni Simone Taiana Andrea Bidini Gianni Fantozzi Francesco
author_sort	Bartocci Pietro
title	Technical Economic and Environmental analysis of Chemical Looping versus oxyfuel combustion for NGCC power plant
title_short	Technical Economic and Environmental analysis of Chemical Looping versus oxyfuel combustion for NGCC power plant
title_full	Technical Economic and Environmental analysis of Chemical Looping versus oxyfuel combustion for NGCC power plant
title_fullStr	Technical Economic and Environmental analysis of Chemical Looping versus oxyfuel combustion for NGCC power plant
title_full_unstemmed	Technical Economic and Environmental analysis of Chemical Looping versus oxyfuel combustion for NGCC power plant
title_sort	technical economic and environmental analysis of chemical looping versus oxyfuel combustion for ngcc power plant
publisher	EDP Sciences
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/9756ed41c09e495ea5c8811701bcdae2
work_keys_str_mv	AT bartoccipietro technicaleconomicandenvironmentalanalysisofchemicalloopingversusoxyfuelcombustionforngccpowerplant AT abadalberto technicaleconomicandenvironmentalanalysisofchemicalloopingversusoxyfuelcombustionforngccpowerplant AT cabelloarturo technicaleconomicandenvironmentalanalysisofchemicalloopingversusoxyfuelcombustionforngccpowerplant AT zampillimauro technicaleconomicandenvironmentalanalysisofchemicalloopingversusoxyfuelcombustionforngccpowerplant AT buiagiulio technicaleconomicandenvironmentalanalysisofchemicalloopingversusoxyfuelcombustionforngccpowerplant AT serraangela technicaleconomicandenvironmentalanalysisofchemicalloopingversusoxyfuelcombustionforngccpowerplant AT colantonisimone technicaleconomicandenvironmentalanalysisofchemicalloopingversusoxyfuelcombustionforngccpowerplant AT taianaandrea technicaleconomicandenvironmentalanalysisofchemicalloopingversusoxyfuelcombustionforngccpowerplant AT bidinigianni technicaleconomicandenvironmentalanalysisofchemicalloopingversusoxyfuelcombustionforngccpowerplant AT fantozzifrancesco technicaleconomicandenvironmentalanalysisofchemicalloopingversusoxyfuelcombustionforngccpowerplant
_version_	1718441973598126080

Technical Economic and Environmental analysis of Chemical Looping versus oxyfuel combustion for NGCC power plant

Ejemplares similares