Maintaining order influences. Ancient interpretations of animal violence

Order occupied a central role in how the ancients understood the world. Violence against animals in the ancient world was acceptable depending, at least in part, on how they were classified into the order-disorder spectrum. Animals that were seen as threatening to order were classified as more wild...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jonathan Rosenthal
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
ES
Publicado: Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona. Facultat de Dret 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9762d47c9e6448ab928b596043ba1850
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9762d47c9e6448ab928b596043ba1850
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9762d47c9e6448ab928b596043ba18502021-11-27T08:47:55ZMaintaining order influences. Ancient interpretations of animal violence10.5565/rev/da.732462-7518https://doaj.org/article/9762d47c9e6448ab928b596043ba18502015-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://revistes.uab.cat/da/article/view/73https://doaj.org/toc/2462-7518Order occupied a central role in how the ancients understood the world. Violence against animals in the ancient world was acceptable depending, at least in part, on how they were classified into the order-disorder spectrum. Animals that were seen as threatening to order were classified as more wild and disorderly, even if the animals were seen as able to form contracts. Animals employed in some manner beneficial to humans, though, were seen as more orderly. Ultimately, if violence was necessary for the preservation of order, especially if the goal was to keep animals in a state of usefulness, it was employed. Lastly, arguments that promote kindness towards animals highlight that this kindness is, in some indirect way, to preserve order.Jonathan RosenthalUniversitat Autonoma de Barcelona. Facultat de DretarticleAnimal cultureSF1-1100Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. JurisprudenceK1-7720ENESDerecho Animal, Vol 6, Iss 3 (2015)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
ES
topic Animal culture
SF1-1100
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
spellingShingle Animal culture
SF1-1100
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
Jonathan Rosenthal
Maintaining order influences. Ancient interpretations of animal violence
description Order occupied a central role in how the ancients understood the world. Violence against animals in the ancient world was acceptable depending, at least in part, on how they were classified into the order-disorder spectrum. Animals that were seen as threatening to order were classified as more wild and disorderly, even if the animals were seen as able to form contracts. Animals employed in some manner beneficial to humans, though, were seen as more orderly. Ultimately, if violence was necessary for the preservation of order, especially if the goal was to keep animals in a state of usefulness, it was employed. Lastly, arguments that promote kindness towards animals highlight that this kindness is, in some indirect way, to preserve order.
format article
author Jonathan Rosenthal
author_facet Jonathan Rosenthal
author_sort Jonathan Rosenthal
title Maintaining order influences. Ancient interpretations of animal violence
title_short Maintaining order influences. Ancient interpretations of animal violence
title_full Maintaining order influences. Ancient interpretations of animal violence
title_fullStr Maintaining order influences. Ancient interpretations of animal violence
title_full_unstemmed Maintaining order influences. Ancient interpretations of animal violence
title_sort maintaining order influences. ancient interpretations of animal violence
publisher Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona. Facultat de Dret
publishDate 2015
url https://doaj.org/article/9762d47c9e6448ab928b596043ba1850
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathanrosenthal maintainingorderinfluencesancientinterpretationsofanimalviolence
_version_ 1718409120636207104