Differences in visually induced MEG oscillations reflect differences in deep cortical layer activity

Pinotsis and Miller present a simplified neural mass model for estimating the laminar dynamics that contribute to non-invasively recorded time frequency data. Using two independent MEG datasets, they give evidence for deep cortical layers contributing to inter-individual variability in visually indu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dimitris A. Pinotsis, Earl K. Miller
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/977a573930d34e32b33b3a3f2121b565
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:977a573930d34e32b33b3a3f2121b565
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:977a573930d34e32b33b3a3f2121b5652021-12-02T15:18:51ZDifferences in visually induced MEG oscillations reflect differences in deep cortical layer activity10.1038/s42003-020-01438-72399-3642https://doaj.org/article/977a573930d34e32b33b3a3f2121b5652020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01438-7https://doaj.org/toc/2399-3642Pinotsis and Miller present a simplified neural mass model for estimating the laminar dynamics that contribute to non-invasively recorded time frequency data. Using two independent MEG datasets, they give evidence for deep cortical layers contributing to inter-individual variability in visually induced oscillations. Their study links non-invasive brain imaging data, laminar dynamics and top-down control.Dimitris A. PinotsisEarl K. MillerNature PortfolioarticleBiology (General)QH301-705.5ENCommunications Biology, Vol 3, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Dimitris A. Pinotsis
Earl K. Miller
Differences in visually induced MEG oscillations reflect differences in deep cortical layer activity
description Pinotsis and Miller present a simplified neural mass model for estimating the laminar dynamics that contribute to non-invasively recorded time frequency data. Using two independent MEG datasets, they give evidence for deep cortical layers contributing to inter-individual variability in visually induced oscillations. Their study links non-invasive brain imaging data, laminar dynamics and top-down control.
format article
author Dimitris A. Pinotsis
Earl K. Miller
author_facet Dimitris A. Pinotsis
Earl K. Miller
author_sort Dimitris A. Pinotsis
title Differences in visually induced MEG oscillations reflect differences in deep cortical layer activity
title_short Differences in visually induced MEG oscillations reflect differences in deep cortical layer activity
title_full Differences in visually induced MEG oscillations reflect differences in deep cortical layer activity
title_fullStr Differences in visually induced MEG oscillations reflect differences in deep cortical layer activity
title_full_unstemmed Differences in visually induced MEG oscillations reflect differences in deep cortical layer activity
title_sort differences in visually induced meg oscillations reflect differences in deep cortical layer activity
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/977a573930d34e32b33b3a3f2121b565
work_keys_str_mv AT dimitrisapinotsis differencesinvisuallyinducedmegoscillationsreflectdifferencesindeepcorticallayeractivity
AT earlkmiller differencesinvisuallyinducedmegoscillationsreflectdifferencesindeepcorticallayeractivity
_version_ 1718387460971429888