Commodity risk assessment of Malus domestica plants from Ukraine

Abstract The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as ‘High risk plants, plant products and other objects’). This Scientific Opinion covers plant health risks po...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH), Claude Bragard, Katharina Dehnen‐Schmutz, Paolo Gonthier, Marie‐Agnès Jacques, Josep Anton Jaques Miret, Annemarie Fejer Justesen, Alan MacLeod, Christer Sven Magnusson, Panagiotis Milonas, Juan A Navas‐Cortes, Stephen Parnell, Roel Potting, Philippe Lucien Reignault, Hans‐Hermann Thulke, Wopke Van der Werf, Antonio Vicent Civera, Lucia Zappalà, Andrea Lucchi, Pedro Gómez, Gregor Urek, Umberto Bernardo, Giovanni Bubici, Anna Vittoria Carluccio, Michela Chiumenti, Francesco Di Serio, Elena Fanelli, Cristina Marzachì, Ciro Gardi, Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz, Eduardo de la Peña, Jonathan Yuen
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/978f8f8e9c3e402b964ce7ba441c2568
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:978f8f8e9c3e402b964ce7ba441c2568
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:978f8f8e9c3e402b964ce7ba441c25682021-12-02T17:55:57ZCommodity risk assessment of Malus domestica plants from Ukraine1831-473210.2903/j.efsa.2021.6909https://doaj.org/article/978f8f8e9c3e402b964ce7ba441c25682021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6909https://doaj.org/toc/1831-4732Abstract The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as ‘High risk plants, plant products and other objects’). This Scientific Opinion covers plant health risks posed by 1‐ to 3‐year‐old dormant grafted plants and rootstocks of Malus domestica imported from Ukraine, taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by Ukraine. All pests associated with the commodity were evaluated against specific criteria for their relevance for this opinion. Two quarantine pests (Lopholeucaspis japonica and Tobacco ringspot virus), one protected zone quarantine pest (Erwinia amylovora) and one non‐regulated pest (Eotetranychus prunicola) that fulfilled all relevant criteria were selected for further evaluation. For Erwinia amylovora, for which special requirements are specified in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072, Annex X, item 9, the fulfilment of these requirements was evaluated. Based on the information provided in the dossier, the specific requirements for Erwinia amylovora were not met. For the three remaining selected pests, the risk mitigation measures proposed in the technical dossier from Ukraine were evaluated taking into account the possible limiting factors. For the selected pests, an expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom taking into consideration the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. The degree of pest freedom varies among the pests evaluated, with Eotetranychus prunicola being the pest most frequently expected on the imported plants. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation indicated with 95% certainty that between 9,912 and 10,000 bundles (consisting of 50 plants each) per 10,000 would be free from Eotetranychus prunicola.EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)Claude BragardKatharina Dehnen‐SchmutzPaolo GonthierMarie‐Agnès JacquesJosep Anton Jaques MiretAnnemarie Fejer JustesenAlan MacLeodChrister Sven MagnussonPanagiotis MilonasJuan A Navas‐CortesStephen ParnellRoel PottingPhilippe Lucien ReignaultHans‐Hermann ThulkeWopke Van der WerfAntonio Vicent CiveraLucia ZappalàAndrea LucchiPedro GómezGregor UrekUmberto BernardoGiovanni BubiciAnna Vittoria CarluccioMichela ChiumentiFrancesco Di SerioElena FanelliCristina MarzachìCiro GardiOlaf Mosbach‐SchulzEduardo de la PeñaJonathan YuenWileyarticleAppleEuropean Unionpathway risk assessmentplant healthplant pestquarantineNutrition. Foods and food supplyTX341-641Chemical technologyTP1-1185ENEFSA Journal, Vol 19, Iss 11, Pp n/a-n/a (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Apple
European Union
pathway risk assessment
plant health
plant pest
quarantine
Nutrition. Foods and food supply
TX341-641
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
spellingShingle Apple
European Union
pathway risk assessment
plant health
plant pest
quarantine
Nutrition. Foods and food supply
TX341-641
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)
Claude Bragard
Katharina Dehnen‐Schmutz
Paolo Gonthier
Marie‐Agnès Jacques
Josep Anton Jaques Miret
Annemarie Fejer Justesen
Alan MacLeod
Christer Sven Magnusson
Panagiotis Milonas
Juan A Navas‐Cortes
Stephen Parnell
Roel Potting
Philippe Lucien Reignault
Hans‐Hermann Thulke
Wopke Van der Werf
Antonio Vicent Civera
Lucia Zappalà
Andrea Lucchi
Pedro Gómez
Gregor Urek
Umberto Bernardo
Giovanni Bubici
Anna Vittoria Carluccio
Michela Chiumenti
Francesco Di Serio
Elena Fanelli
Cristina Marzachì
Ciro Gardi
Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz
Eduardo de la Peña
Jonathan Yuen
Commodity risk assessment of Malus domestica plants from Ukraine
description Abstract The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as ‘High risk plants, plant products and other objects’). This Scientific Opinion covers plant health risks posed by 1‐ to 3‐year‐old dormant grafted plants and rootstocks of Malus domestica imported from Ukraine, taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by Ukraine. All pests associated with the commodity were evaluated against specific criteria for their relevance for this opinion. Two quarantine pests (Lopholeucaspis japonica and Tobacco ringspot virus), one protected zone quarantine pest (Erwinia amylovora) and one non‐regulated pest (Eotetranychus prunicola) that fulfilled all relevant criteria were selected for further evaluation. For Erwinia amylovora, for which special requirements are specified in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072, Annex X, item 9, the fulfilment of these requirements was evaluated. Based on the information provided in the dossier, the specific requirements for Erwinia amylovora were not met. For the three remaining selected pests, the risk mitigation measures proposed in the technical dossier from Ukraine were evaluated taking into account the possible limiting factors. For the selected pests, an expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom taking into consideration the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. The degree of pest freedom varies among the pests evaluated, with Eotetranychus prunicola being the pest most frequently expected on the imported plants. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation indicated with 95% certainty that between 9,912 and 10,000 bundles (consisting of 50 plants each) per 10,000 would be free from Eotetranychus prunicola.
format article
author EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)
Claude Bragard
Katharina Dehnen‐Schmutz
Paolo Gonthier
Marie‐Agnès Jacques
Josep Anton Jaques Miret
Annemarie Fejer Justesen
Alan MacLeod
Christer Sven Magnusson
Panagiotis Milonas
Juan A Navas‐Cortes
Stephen Parnell
Roel Potting
Philippe Lucien Reignault
Hans‐Hermann Thulke
Wopke Van der Werf
Antonio Vicent Civera
Lucia Zappalà
Andrea Lucchi
Pedro Gómez
Gregor Urek
Umberto Bernardo
Giovanni Bubici
Anna Vittoria Carluccio
Michela Chiumenti
Francesco Di Serio
Elena Fanelli
Cristina Marzachì
Ciro Gardi
Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz
Eduardo de la Peña
Jonathan Yuen
author_facet EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)
Claude Bragard
Katharina Dehnen‐Schmutz
Paolo Gonthier
Marie‐Agnès Jacques
Josep Anton Jaques Miret
Annemarie Fejer Justesen
Alan MacLeod
Christer Sven Magnusson
Panagiotis Milonas
Juan A Navas‐Cortes
Stephen Parnell
Roel Potting
Philippe Lucien Reignault
Hans‐Hermann Thulke
Wopke Van der Werf
Antonio Vicent Civera
Lucia Zappalà
Andrea Lucchi
Pedro Gómez
Gregor Urek
Umberto Bernardo
Giovanni Bubici
Anna Vittoria Carluccio
Michela Chiumenti
Francesco Di Serio
Elena Fanelli
Cristina Marzachì
Ciro Gardi
Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz
Eduardo de la Peña
Jonathan Yuen
author_sort EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)
title Commodity risk assessment of Malus domestica plants from Ukraine
title_short Commodity risk assessment of Malus domestica plants from Ukraine
title_full Commodity risk assessment of Malus domestica plants from Ukraine
title_fullStr Commodity risk assessment of Malus domestica plants from Ukraine
title_full_unstemmed Commodity risk assessment of Malus domestica plants from Ukraine
title_sort commodity risk assessment of malus domestica plants from ukraine
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/978f8f8e9c3e402b964ce7ba441c2568
work_keys_str_mv AT efsapanelonplanthealthplh commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT claudebragard commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT katharinadehnenschmutz commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT paologonthier commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT marieagnesjacques commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT josepantonjaquesmiret commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT annemariefejerjustesen commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT alanmacleod commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT christersvenmagnusson commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT panagiotismilonas commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT juananavascortes commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT stephenparnell commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT roelpotting commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT philippelucienreignault commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT hanshermannthulke commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT wopkevanderwerf commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT antoniovicentcivera commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT luciazappala commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT andrealucchi commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT pedrogomez commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT gregorurek commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT umbertobernardo commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT giovannibubici commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT annavittoriacarluccio commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT michelachiumenti commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT francescodiserio commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT elenafanelli commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT cristinamarzachi commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT cirogardi commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT olafmosbachschulz commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT eduardodelapena commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT jonathanyuen commodityriskassessmentofmalusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
_version_ 1718379061087043584