Non-timber forest products as livelihood restoration in forest conservation: A restorative justice approach

The restoration of the livelihood of forest-based communities is an important element of forest conservation. In this study, we developed a framework of restorative justice to critically evaluate the fairness and equity of the management of non-timber forest products (NTFPs), which is often consider...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liyuan Zhu, Kevin Lo
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/97b679fe4f334c019ebdb41277d42986
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:97b679fe4f334c019ebdb41277d42986
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:97b679fe4f334c019ebdb41277d429862021-12-04T04:36:10ZNon-timber forest products as livelihood restoration in forest conservation: A restorative justice approach2666-719310.1016/j.tfp.2021.100130https://doaj.org/article/97b679fe4f334c019ebdb41277d429862021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719321000698https://doaj.org/toc/2666-7193The restoration of the livelihood of forest-based communities is an important element of forest conservation. In this study, we developed a framework of restorative justice to critically evaluate the fairness and equity of the management of non-timber forest products (NTFPs), which is often considered an important means of livelihood restoration in forest conservation. The framework, consisting of three tenets—recognitional, procedural, and distributive justice—was applied to an ethnographic study conducted in the Greater Khingan Range—a key site of forest conservation in China. The findings reveal that attempts to commercialize and use NTFPs have failed to achieve restorative justice. From the perspective of recognition justice, which concerns the different viewpoints being considered in decision-making, there is an imbalance in representation—higher-level government's preferences for certain action result in the creation of political projects, even though they are not likely to succeed, whereas local, bottom-up NTFP projects are ignored and under-supported by the government. From the procedural perspective, the lack of engagement of experts and participation of public undermines the quality of NTFP projects and the implementation of NTFP management policies. From the distribution perspective, the opportunities to gain benefits from NTFP projects are not equally distributed between state-owned forestry enterprise (SOFE) workers and non-workers. These findings show that it is important to incorporate fairness and equity issues considerations in the design and evaluation of NTFP projects, and our restorative justice framework provides an analytical basis to do so.Liyuan ZhuKevin LoElsevierarticleNon-timber forest productsRestorative justiceForest conservationLivelihood restorationChinaForestrySD1-669.5Plant ecologyQK900-989ENTrees, Forests and People, Vol 6, Iss , Pp 100130- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Non-timber forest products
Restorative justice
Forest conservation
Livelihood restoration
China
Forestry
SD1-669.5
Plant ecology
QK900-989
spellingShingle Non-timber forest products
Restorative justice
Forest conservation
Livelihood restoration
China
Forestry
SD1-669.5
Plant ecology
QK900-989
Liyuan Zhu
Kevin Lo
Non-timber forest products as livelihood restoration in forest conservation: A restorative justice approach
description The restoration of the livelihood of forest-based communities is an important element of forest conservation. In this study, we developed a framework of restorative justice to critically evaluate the fairness and equity of the management of non-timber forest products (NTFPs), which is often considered an important means of livelihood restoration in forest conservation. The framework, consisting of three tenets—recognitional, procedural, and distributive justice—was applied to an ethnographic study conducted in the Greater Khingan Range—a key site of forest conservation in China. The findings reveal that attempts to commercialize and use NTFPs have failed to achieve restorative justice. From the perspective of recognition justice, which concerns the different viewpoints being considered in decision-making, there is an imbalance in representation—higher-level government's preferences for certain action result in the creation of political projects, even though they are not likely to succeed, whereas local, bottom-up NTFP projects are ignored and under-supported by the government. From the procedural perspective, the lack of engagement of experts and participation of public undermines the quality of NTFP projects and the implementation of NTFP management policies. From the distribution perspective, the opportunities to gain benefits from NTFP projects are not equally distributed between state-owned forestry enterprise (SOFE) workers and non-workers. These findings show that it is important to incorporate fairness and equity issues considerations in the design and evaluation of NTFP projects, and our restorative justice framework provides an analytical basis to do so.
format article
author Liyuan Zhu
Kevin Lo
author_facet Liyuan Zhu
Kevin Lo
author_sort Liyuan Zhu
title Non-timber forest products as livelihood restoration in forest conservation: A restorative justice approach
title_short Non-timber forest products as livelihood restoration in forest conservation: A restorative justice approach
title_full Non-timber forest products as livelihood restoration in forest conservation: A restorative justice approach
title_fullStr Non-timber forest products as livelihood restoration in forest conservation: A restorative justice approach
title_full_unstemmed Non-timber forest products as livelihood restoration in forest conservation: A restorative justice approach
title_sort non-timber forest products as livelihood restoration in forest conservation: a restorative justice approach
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/97b679fe4f334c019ebdb41277d42986
work_keys_str_mv AT liyuanzhu nontimberforestproductsaslivelihoodrestorationinforestconservationarestorativejusticeapproach
AT kevinlo nontimberforestproductsaslivelihoodrestorationinforestconservationarestorativejusticeapproach
_version_ 1718372928543784960