Comparison of Anthropometric and Conicity indicators in Students with Premenstrual Syndrome

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Body composition and body fat are important in the prevention of chronic diseases in people with premenstrual syndrome. This study was performed to compare the anthropometric and conicity indexes in PMS and healthy people. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed o...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	A Ramezani, SM Hoseini, M Chaleshgar Kordasiabi
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FA
Publicado:	Babol University of Medical Sciences 2019
Materias:	premenstrual syndrome students conisity body composition Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/97dcda199a85407cabed0be637ea9f4f
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:97dcda199a85407cabed0be637ea9f4f
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:97dcda199a85407cabed0be637ea9f4f2021-11-10T08:30:37ZComparison of Anthropometric and Conicity indicators in Students with Premenstrual Syndrome1561-41072251-7170https://doaj.org/article/97dcda199a85407cabed0be637ea9f4f2019-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://jbums.org/article-1-7932-en.htmlhttps://doaj.org/toc/1561-4107https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7170BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Body composition and body fat are important in the prevention of chronic diseases in people with premenstrual syndrome. This study was performed to compare the anthropometric and conicity indexes in PMS and healthy people. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed on 92 dormitory students living in Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences over 18 years of age in two groups with premenstrual syndrome and healthy subjects. Anthropometric and conicity parameters were measured and compared in two groups. FINDINGS: In this study, 46 (54.8%) patients in the PMS group with an average age of 22.02±1.51 years and 38 (45.2%) in the healthy group with an average age of 21.34±2.32 that there was no significant difference between the two groups in the test (p=0.08). In the PMS group, this disorder was significantly different from that of the healthy group (p=0.0001), and the anger and allergies and anthropometric indices were significantly higher in students with menstrual syndrome than in healthy subjects (see The order of p=0.003, p=0.007, p=0.001, p= 0.02, p= 0.01, p= 0.001), but the two groups did not have a significant difference in terms of conicity. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that subjects with premenstrual syndrome group had higher anthropometric indices than healthy subjects. But they do not differ in terms of conicity.A RamezaniSM HoseiniM Chaleshgar KordasiabiBabol University of Medical Sciencesarticlepremenstrual syndromestudentsconisitybody compositionMedicineRMedicine (General)R5-920ENFAMajallah-i Dānishgāh-i ̒Ulūm-i Pizishkī-i Bābul, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 357-363 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FA
topic	premenstrual syndrome students conisity body composition Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920
spellingShingle	premenstrual syndrome students conisity body composition Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920 A Ramezani SM Hoseini M Chaleshgar Kordasiabi Comparison of Anthropometric and Conicity indicators in Students with Premenstrual Syndrome
description	BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Body composition and body fat are important in the prevention of chronic diseases in people with premenstrual syndrome. This study was performed to compare the anthropometric and conicity indexes in PMS and healthy people. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed on 92 dormitory students living in Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences over 18 years of age in two groups with premenstrual syndrome and healthy subjects. Anthropometric and conicity parameters were measured and compared in two groups. FINDINGS: In this study, 46 (54.8%) patients in the PMS group with an average age of 22.02±1.51 years and 38 (45.2%) in the healthy group with an average age of 21.34±2.32 that there was no significant difference between the two groups in the test (p=0.08). In the PMS group, this disorder was significantly different from that of the healthy group (p=0.0001), and the anger and allergies and anthropometric indices were significantly higher in students with menstrual syndrome than in healthy subjects (see The order of p=0.003, p=0.007, p=0.001, p= 0.02, p= 0.01, p= 0.001), but the two groups did not have a significant difference in terms of conicity. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that subjects with premenstrual syndrome group had higher anthropometric indices than healthy subjects. But they do not differ in terms of conicity.
format	article
author	A Ramezani SM Hoseini M Chaleshgar Kordasiabi
author_facet	A Ramezani SM Hoseini M Chaleshgar Kordasiabi
author_sort	A Ramezani
title	Comparison of Anthropometric and Conicity indicators in Students with Premenstrual Syndrome
title_short	Comparison of Anthropometric and Conicity indicators in Students with Premenstrual Syndrome
title_full	Comparison of Anthropometric and Conicity indicators in Students with Premenstrual Syndrome
title_fullStr	Comparison of Anthropometric and Conicity indicators in Students with Premenstrual Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison of Anthropometric and Conicity indicators in Students with Premenstrual Syndrome
title_sort	comparison of anthropometric and conicity indicators in students with premenstrual syndrome
publisher	Babol University of Medical Sciences
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/97dcda199a85407cabed0be637ea9f4f
work_keys_str_mv	AT aramezani comparisonofanthropometricandconicityindicatorsinstudentswithpremenstrualsyndrome AT smhoseini comparisonofanthropometricandconicityindicatorsinstudentswithpremenstrualsyndrome AT mchaleshgarkordasiabi comparisonofanthropometricandconicityindicatorsinstudentswithpremenstrualsyndrome
_version_	1718440399847030784

Comparison of Anthropometric and Conicity indicators in Students with Premenstrual Syndrome

Ejemplares similares