Scientific and regulatory evaluation of mechanistic in silico drug and disease models in drug development: Building model credibility
Abstract The value of in silico methods in drug development and evaluation has been demonstrated repeatedly and convincingly. While their benefits are now unanimously recognized, international standards for their evaluation, accepted by all stakeholders involved, are still to be established. In this...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Wiley
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/97e2e67f5a5b4314bf9e9f73a5497dde |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:97e2e67f5a5b4314bf9e9f73a5497dde |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:97e2e67f5a5b4314bf9e9f73a5497dde2021-11-19T15:35:29ZScientific and regulatory evaluation of mechanistic in silico drug and disease models in drug development: Building model credibility2163-830610.1002/psp4.12669https://doaj.org/article/97e2e67f5a5b4314bf9e9f73a5497dde2021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12669https://doaj.org/toc/2163-8306Abstract The value of in silico methods in drug development and evaluation has been demonstrated repeatedly and convincingly. While their benefits are now unanimously recognized, international standards for their evaluation, accepted by all stakeholders involved, are still to be established. In this white paper, we propose a risk‐informed evaluation framework for mechanistic model credibility evaluation. To properly frame the proposed verification and validation activities, concepts such as context of use, regulatory impact and risk‐based analysis are discussed. To ensure common understanding between all stakeholders, an overview is provided of relevant in silico terminology used throughout this paper. To illustrate the feasibility of the proposed approach, we have applied it to three real case examples in the context of drug development, using a credibility matrix currently being tested as a quick‐start tool by regulators. Altogether, this white paper provides a practical approach to model evaluation, applicable in both scientific and regulatory evaluation contexts.Flora T. MusuambaIne Skottheim RustenRaphaëlle LesageGiulia RussoRoberta BursiLuca EmiliGaby WangorschEfthymios ManolisKristin E. KarlssonAlexander KuleszaEulalie CourcellesJean‐Pierre BoisselCécile F. RousseauEmmanuelle M. VoisinRossana AlessandrelloNuno CuradoEnrico Dall’araBlanca RodriguezFrancesco PappalardoLiesbet GerisWileyarticleTherapeutics. PharmacologyRM1-950ENCPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, Vol 10, Iss 8, Pp 804-825 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Therapeutics. Pharmacology RM1-950 |
spellingShingle |
Therapeutics. Pharmacology RM1-950 Flora T. Musuamba Ine Skottheim Rusten Raphaëlle Lesage Giulia Russo Roberta Bursi Luca Emili Gaby Wangorsch Efthymios Manolis Kristin E. Karlsson Alexander Kulesza Eulalie Courcelles Jean‐Pierre Boissel Cécile F. Rousseau Emmanuelle M. Voisin Rossana Alessandrello Nuno Curado Enrico Dall’ara Blanca Rodriguez Francesco Pappalardo Liesbet Geris Scientific and regulatory evaluation of mechanistic in silico drug and disease models in drug development: Building model credibility |
description |
Abstract The value of in silico methods in drug development and evaluation has been demonstrated repeatedly and convincingly. While their benefits are now unanimously recognized, international standards for their evaluation, accepted by all stakeholders involved, are still to be established. In this white paper, we propose a risk‐informed evaluation framework for mechanistic model credibility evaluation. To properly frame the proposed verification and validation activities, concepts such as context of use, regulatory impact and risk‐based analysis are discussed. To ensure common understanding between all stakeholders, an overview is provided of relevant in silico terminology used throughout this paper. To illustrate the feasibility of the proposed approach, we have applied it to three real case examples in the context of drug development, using a credibility matrix currently being tested as a quick‐start tool by regulators. Altogether, this white paper provides a practical approach to model evaluation, applicable in both scientific and regulatory evaluation contexts. |
format |
article |
author |
Flora T. Musuamba Ine Skottheim Rusten Raphaëlle Lesage Giulia Russo Roberta Bursi Luca Emili Gaby Wangorsch Efthymios Manolis Kristin E. Karlsson Alexander Kulesza Eulalie Courcelles Jean‐Pierre Boissel Cécile F. Rousseau Emmanuelle M. Voisin Rossana Alessandrello Nuno Curado Enrico Dall’ara Blanca Rodriguez Francesco Pappalardo Liesbet Geris |
author_facet |
Flora T. Musuamba Ine Skottheim Rusten Raphaëlle Lesage Giulia Russo Roberta Bursi Luca Emili Gaby Wangorsch Efthymios Manolis Kristin E. Karlsson Alexander Kulesza Eulalie Courcelles Jean‐Pierre Boissel Cécile F. Rousseau Emmanuelle M. Voisin Rossana Alessandrello Nuno Curado Enrico Dall’ara Blanca Rodriguez Francesco Pappalardo Liesbet Geris |
author_sort |
Flora T. Musuamba |
title |
Scientific and regulatory evaluation of mechanistic in silico drug and disease models in drug development: Building model credibility |
title_short |
Scientific and regulatory evaluation of mechanistic in silico drug and disease models in drug development: Building model credibility |
title_full |
Scientific and regulatory evaluation of mechanistic in silico drug and disease models in drug development: Building model credibility |
title_fullStr |
Scientific and regulatory evaluation of mechanistic in silico drug and disease models in drug development: Building model credibility |
title_full_unstemmed |
Scientific and regulatory evaluation of mechanistic in silico drug and disease models in drug development: Building model credibility |
title_sort |
scientific and regulatory evaluation of mechanistic in silico drug and disease models in drug development: building model credibility |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/97e2e67f5a5b4314bf9e9f73a5497dde |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT floratmusuamba scientificandregulatoryevaluationofmechanisticinsilicodruganddiseasemodelsindrugdevelopmentbuildingmodelcredibility AT ineskottheimrusten scientificandregulatoryevaluationofmechanisticinsilicodruganddiseasemodelsindrugdevelopmentbuildingmodelcredibility AT raphaellelesage scientificandregulatoryevaluationofmechanisticinsilicodruganddiseasemodelsindrugdevelopmentbuildingmodelcredibility AT giuliarusso scientificandregulatoryevaluationofmechanisticinsilicodruganddiseasemodelsindrugdevelopmentbuildingmodelcredibility AT robertabursi scientificandregulatoryevaluationofmechanisticinsilicodruganddiseasemodelsindrugdevelopmentbuildingmodelcredibility AT lucaemili scientificandregulatoryevaluationofmechanisticinsilicodruganddiseasemodelsindrugdevelopmentbuildingmodelcredibility AT gabywangorsch scientificandregulatoryevaluationofmechanisticinsilicodruganddiseasemodelsindrugdevelopmentbuildingmodelcredibility AT efthymiosmanolis scientificandregulatoryevaluationofmechanisticinsilicodruganddiseasemodelsindrugdevelopmentbuildingmodelcredibility AT kristinekarlsson scientificandregulatoryevaluationofmechanisticinsilicodruganddiseasemodelsindrugdevelopmentbuildingmodelcredibility AT alexanderkulesza scientificandregulatoryevaluationofmechanisticinsilicodruganddiseasemodelsindrugdevelopmentbuildingmodelcredibility AT eulaliecourcelles scientificandregulatoryevaluationofmechanisticinsilicodruganddiseasemodelsindrugdevelopmentbuildingmodelcredibility AT jeanpierreboissel scientificandregulatoryevaluationofmechanisticinsilicodruganddiseasemodelsindrugdevelopmentbuildingmodelcredibility AT cecilefrousseau scientificandregulatoryevaluationofmechanisticinsilicodruganddiseasemodelsindrugdevelopmentbuildingmodelcredibility AT emmanuellemvoisin scientificandregulatoryevaluationofmechanisticinsilicodruganddiseasemodelsindrugdevelopmentbuildingmodelcredibility AT rossanaalessandrello scientificandregulatoryevaluationofmechanisticinsilicodruganddiseasemodelsindrugdevelopmentbuildingmodelcredibility AT nunocurado scientificandregulatoryevaluationofmechanisticinsilicodruganddiseasemodelsindrugdevelopmentbuildingmodelcredibility AT enricodallara scientificandregulatoryevaluationofmechanisticinsilicodruganddiseasemodelsindrugdevelopmentbuildingmodelcredibility AT blancarodriguez scientificandregulatoryevaluationofmechanisticinsilicodruganddiseasemodelsindrugdevelopmentbuildingmodelcredibility AT francescopappalardo scientificandregulatoryevaluationofmechanisticinsilicodruganddiseasemodelsindrugdevelopmentbuildingmodelcredibility AT liesbetgeris scientificandregulatoryevaluationofmechanisticinsilicodruganddiseasemodelsindrugdevelopmentbuildingmodelcredibility |
_version_ |
1718420028104114176 |