Predictive Value of [18F]FDG PET/CT for Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer

Abstract [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is commonly used for rectal cancer staging, but improved diagnostic methods for nodal metastases are needed. We aimed to evaluate whether the combination model of the metabolic tumor volume of prima...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sung Hoon Kim, Bong-Il Song, Beong Woo Kim, Hae Won Kim, Kyoung Sook Won, Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2019
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/98058749fc3d446097945c739307b9fa
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:98058749fc3d446097945c739307b9fa
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:98058749fc3d446097945c739307b9fa2021-12-02T16:08:16ZPredictive Value of [18F]FDG PET/CT for Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer10.1038/s41598-019-41422-82045-2322https://doaj.org/article/98058749fc3d446097945c739307b9fa2019-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41422-8https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is commonly used for rectal cancer staging, but improved diagnostic methods for nodal metastases are needed. We aimed to evaluate whether the combination model of the metabolic tumor volume of primary tumor (T_MTV) and maximum standardized uptake value of lymph node (N_SUVmax) on pretreatment [18F]FDG PET/CT could improve nodal metastases prediction in rectal cancer. We enrolled a total of 166 rectal cancer patients who underwent pretreatment [18F]FDG PET/CT and surgical resection without neoadjuvant treatment between January 2009 and August 2016. Visual and semiquantitative PET/CT parameters were obtained. Associations between clinicopathological, PET/CT-derived variables and nodal metastases were evaluated by logistic regression analysis. Nodal metastases were confirmed histologically in 68 of the 166 patients (41%). Uni- and multivariate analyses demonstrated T_MTV and N_SUVmax were independent predictive factors for nodal metastases. The c-statistics of the combination model was 0.806 (Standard Error, 0.034; 95% Confidence Interval, 0.737–0.863), which showed significant improvement compared to T_MTV (0.698, P = 0.0002) or N_SUVmax (0.720, P = 0.0008) alone. T_MTV and N_SUVmax are independently correlated with nodal metastases. Furthermore, the combination model showed improved performance for risk prediction; thus, [18F]FDG PET/CT might have a role in rectal cancer staging and treatment planning.Sung Hoon KimBong-Il SongBeong Woo KimHae Won KimKyoung Sook WonSung Uk BaeWoon Kyung JeongSeong Kyu BaekNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Sung Hoon Kim
Bong-Il Song
Beong Woo Kim
Hae Won Kim
Kyoung Sook Won
Sung Uk Bae
Woon Kyung Jeong
Seong Kyu Baek
Predictive Value of [18F]FDG PET/CT for Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer
description Abstract [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is commonly used for rectal cancer staging, but improved diagnostic methods for nodal metastases are needed. We aimed to evaluate whether the combination model of the metabolic tumor volume of primary tumor (T_MTV) and maximum standardized uptake value of lymph node (N_SUVmax) on pretreatment [18F]FDG PET/CT could improve nodal metastases prediction in rectal cancer. We enrolled a total of 166 rectal cancer patients who underwent pretreatment [18F]FDG PET/CT and surgical resection without neoadjuvant treatment between January 2009 and August 2016. Visual and semiquantitative PET/CT parameters were obtained. Associations between clinicopathological, PET/CT-derived variables and nodal metastases were evaluated by logistic regression analysis. Nodal metastases were confirmed histologically in 68 of the 166 patients (41%). Uni- and multivariate analyses demonstrated T_MTV and N_SUVmax were independent predictive factors for nodal metastases. The c-statistics of the combination model was 0.806 (Standard Error, 0.034; 95% Confidence Interval, 0.737–0.863), which showed significant improvement compared to T_MTV (0.698, P = 0.0002) or N_SUVmax (0.720, P = 0.0008) alone. T_MTV and N_SUVmax are independently correlated with nodal metastases. Furthermore, the combination model showed improved performance for risk prediction; thus, [18F]FDG PET/CT might have a role in rectal cancer staging and treatment planning.
format article
author Sung Hoon Kim
Bong-Il Song
Beong Woo Kim
Hae Won Kim
Kyoung Sook Won
Sung Uk Bae
Woon Kyung Jeong
Seong Kyu Baek
author_facet Sung Hoon Kim
Bong-Il Song
Beong Woo Kim
Hae Won Kim
Kyoung Sook Won
Sung Uk Bae
Woon Kyung Jeong
Seong Kyu Baek
author_sort Sung Hoon Kim
title Predictive Value of [18F]FDG PET/CT for Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer
title_short Predictive Value of [18F]FDG PET/CT for Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer
title_full Predictive Value of [18F]FDG PET/CT for Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer
title_fullStr Predictive Value of [18F]FDG PET/CT for Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Predictive Value of [18F]FDG PET/CT for Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer
title_sort predictive value of [18f]fdg pet/ct for lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/98058749fc3d446097945c739307b9fa
work_keys_str_mv AT sunghoonkim predictivevalueof18ffdgpetctforlymphnodemetastasisinrectalcancer
AT bongilsong predictivevalueof18ffdgpetctforlymphnodemetastasisinrectalcancer
AT beongwookim predictivevalueof18ffdgpetctforlymphnodemetastasisinrectalcancer
AT haewonkim predictivevalueof18ffdgpetctforlymphnodemetastasisinrectalcancer
AT kyoungsookwon predictivevalueof18ffdgpetctforlymphnodemetastasisinrectalcancer
AT sungukbae predictivevalueof18ffdgpetctforlymphnodemetastasisinrectalcancer
AT woonkyungjeong predictivevalueof18ffdgpetctforlymphnodemetastasisinrectalcancer
AT seongkyubaek predictivevalueof18ffdgpetctforlymphnodemetastasisinrectalcancer
_version_ 1718384545394327552