Paradoxical puborectalis syndrome on diffusion-weighted imaging: a retrospective study of 72 cases

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the application value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for assessing paradoxical puborectalis syndrome (PPS) in patients with obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS). The medical records of 72 ODS patients who underwent magnetic resonance (MR)-DWI and MR-defeco...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guiqin Liu, Zhe Cui, Yongming Dai, Qiuying Yao, Jianrong Xu, Guangyu Wu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/98122a3824a24d2e8a93d8ddf17d6c6d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the application value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for assessing paradoxical puborectalis syndrome (PPS) in patients with obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS). The medical records of 72 ODS patients who underwent magnetic resonance (MR)-DWI and MR-defecography were retrospectively reviewed. The differences in the apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) and the thickness of the right and left branches of the puborectalis muscles between the PPS(+) and PPS(−) groups were compared. In addition, the absolute within-patient differences between the right and left branches (ADC, thickness) were compared between the two groups. The absolute difference in ADCs (right branch - left branch) was significantly different between the two groups. Regardless of whether the ADC was acquired through single-ROI (0.10 ± 0.08 vs 0.23 ± 0.18, P = 0.000) or multi-ROI (0.16 ± 0.14 vs 0.27 ± 0.17, P = 0.009) analysis, the PPS(+) patients displayed a lower absolute ADC difference than did the PPS(−) patients. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the ADC value, thickness or the absolute difference in thickness between the two groups. These findings suggest that DWI may have value in quantitatively assessing the puborectalis muscle in ODS patients, whereas the value of puborectalis thickness in such aspect needs further study.