Suburban Residents’ Preferences for Livable Residential Area in Finland

This paper analyzed Finnish suburban residents’ preferences (including their perception of wood as a building material) for livable residential areas through a survey questionnaire. The 243 responses received highlighted the following: residents were generally satisfied with the general condition of...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Markku Karjalainen, Hüseyin Emre Ilgın, Lauri Metsäranta, Markku Norvasuo
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9812c2d60f394144a40f2133461a840a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9812c2d60f394144a40f2133461a840a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9812c2d60f394144a40f2133461a840a2021-11-11T19:32:39ZSuburban Residents’ Preferences for Livable Residential Area in Finland10.3390/su1321118412071-1050https://doaj.org/article/9812c2d60f394144a40f2133461a840a2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11841https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050This paper analyzed Finnish suburban residents’ preferences (including their perception of wood as a building material) for livable residential areas through a survey questionnaire. The 243 responses received highlighted the following: residents were generally satisfied with the general condition of their residence; the majority supported life in one- to two-story buildings and a low-density residential environment; living in the center was found more attractive by most; the most popular facade material was wood; considerations regarding the immediate environment, e.g., proximity to nature and child-friendly areas in the immediate vicinity, were evaluated as important parameters; participants’ attitudes towards the use of wood in construction were generally very positive; residents generally considered wooden buildings more beautiful, more environmentally friendly/ecological, and as having a healthier indoor climate than buildings made of non-wood materials; and fire safety and cost-competitiveness were issues of skepticism. It is believed that this study will provide insights to key stakeholders, e.g., architects, developers, policymakers, to better meet the needs of suburban apartment-dwellers.Markku KarjalainenHüseyin Emre IlgınLauri MetsärantaMarkku NorvasuoMDPI AGarticlesuburban residentsparticipative processlivableresidential areawood/timberFinlandEnvironmental effects of industries and plantsTD194-195Renewable energy sourcesTJ807-830Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENSustainability, Vol 13, Iss 11841, p 11841 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic suburban residents
participative process
livable
residential area
wood/timber
Finland
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle suburban residents
participative process
livable
residential area
wood/timber
Finland
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Markku Karjalainen
Hüseyin Emre Ilgın
Lauri Metsäranta
Markku Norvasuo
Suburban Residents’ Preferences for Livable Residential Area in Finland
description This paper analyzed Finnish suburban residents’ preferences (including their perception of wood as a building material) for livable residential areas through a survey questionnaire. The 243 responses received highlighted the following: residents were generally satisfied with the general condition of their residence; the majority supported life in one- to two-story buildings and a low-density residential environment; living in the center was found more attractive by most; the most popular facade material was wood; considerations regarding the immediate environment, e.g., proximity to nature and child-friendly areas in the immediate vicinity, were evaluated as important parameters; participants’ attitudes towards the use of wood in construction were generally very positive; residents generally considered wooden buildings more beautiful, more environmentally friendly/ecological, and as having a healthier indoor climate than buildings made of non-wood materials; and fire safety and cost-competitiveness were issues of skepticism. It is believed that this study will provide insights to key stakeholders, e.g., architects, developers, policymakers, to better meet the needs of suburban apartment-dwellers.
format article
author Markku Karjalainen
Hüseyin Emre Ilgın
Lauri Metsäranta
Markku Norvasuo
author_facet Markku Karjalainen
Hüseyin Emre Ilgın
Lauri Metsäranta
Markku Norvasuo
author_sort Markku Karjalainen
title Suburban Residents’ Preferences for Livable Residential Area in Finland
title_short Suburban Residents’ Preferences for Livable Residential Area in Finland
title_full Suburban Residents’ Preferences for Livable Residential Area in Finland
title_fullStr Suburban Residents’ Preferences for Livable Residential Area in Finland
title_full_unstemmed Suburban Residents’ Preferences for Livable Residential Area in Finland
title_sort suburban residents’ preferences for livable residential area in finland
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/9812c2d60f394144a40f2133461a840a
work_keys_str_mv AT markkukarjalainen suburbanresidentspreferencesforlivableresidentialareainfinland
AT huseyinemreilgın suburbanresidentspreferencesforlivableresidentialareainfinland
AT laurimetsaranta suburbanresidentspreferencesforlivableresidentialareainfinland
AT markkunorvasuo suburbanresidentspreferencesforlivableresidentialareainfinland
_version_ 1718431482377142272