Suburban Residents’ Preferences for Livable Residential Area in Finland
This paper analyzed Finnish suburban residents’ preferences (including their perception of wood as a building material) for livable residential areas through a survey questionnaire. The 243 responses received highlighted the following: residents were generally satisfied with the general condition of...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/9812c2d60f394144a40f2133461a840a |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:9812c2d60f394144a40f2133461a840a |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:9812c2d60f394144a40f2133461a840a2021-11-11T19:32:39ZSuburban Residents’ Preferences for Livable Residential Area in Finland10.3390/su1321118412071-1050https://doaj.org/article/9812c2d60f394144a40f2133461a840a2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11841https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050This paper analyzed Finnish suburban residents’ preferences (including their perception of wood as a building material) for livable residential areas through a survey questionnaire. The 243 responses received highlighted the following: residents were generally satisfied with the general condition of their residence; the majority supported life in one- to two-story buildings and a low-density residential environment; living in the center was found more attractive by most; the most popular facade material was wood; considerations regarding the immediate environment, e.g., proximity to nature and child-friendly areas in the immediate vicinity, were evaluated as important parameters; participants’ attitudes towards the use of wood in construction were generally very positive; residents generally considered wooden buildings more beautiful, more environmentally friendly/ecological, and as having a healthier indoor climate than buildings made of non-wood materials; and fire safety and cost-competitiveness were issues of skepticism. It is believed that this study will provide insights to key stakeholders, e.g., architects, developers, policymakers, to better meet the needs of suburban apartment-dwellers.Markku KarjalainenHüseyin Emre IlgınLauri MetsärantaMarkku NorvasuoMDPI AGarticlesuburban residentsparticipative processlivableresidential areawood/timberFinlandEnvironmental effects of industries and plantsTD194-195Renewable energy sourcesTJ807-830Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENSustainability, Vol 13, Iss 11841, p 11841 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
suburban residents participative process livable residential area wood/timber Finland Environmental effects of industries and plants TD194-195 Renewable energy sources TJ807-830 Environmental sciences GE1-350 |
spellingShingle |
suburban residents participative process livable residential area wood/timber Finland Environmental effects of industries and plants TD194-195 Renewable energy sources TJ807-830 Environmental sciences GE1-350 Markku Karjalainen Hüseyin Emre Ilgın Lauri Metsäranta Markku Norvasuo Suburban Residents’ Preferences for Livable Residential Area in Finland |
description |
This paper analyzed Finnish suburban residents’ preferences (including their perception of wood as a building material) for livable residential areas through a survey questionnaire. The 243 responses received highlighted the following: residents were generally satisfied with the general condition of their residence; the majority supported life in one- to two-story buildings and a low-density residential environment; living in the center was found more attractive by most; the most popular facade material was wood; considerations regarding the immediate environment, e.g., proximity to nature and child-friendly areas in the immediate vicinity, were evaluated as important parameters; participants’ attitudes towards the use of wood in construction were generally very positive; residents generally considered wooden buildings more beautiful, more environmentally friendly/ecological, and as having a healthier indoor climate than buildings made of non-wood materials; and fire safety and cost-competitiveness were issues of skepticism. It is believed that this study will provide insights to key stakeholders, e.g., architects, developers, policymakers, to better meet the needs of suburban apartment-dwellers. |
format |
article |
author |
Markku Karjalainen Hüseyin Emre Ilgın Lauri Metsäranta Markku Norvasuo |
author_facet |
Markku Karjalainen Hüseyin Emre Ilgın Lauri Metsäranta Markku Norvasuo |
author_sort |
Markku Karjalainen |
title |
Suburban Residents’ Preferences for Livable Residential Area in Finland |
title_short |
Suburban Residents’ Preferences for Livable Residential Area in Finland |
title_full |
Suburban Residents’ Preferences for Livable Residential Area in Finland |
title_fullStr |
Suburban Residents’ Preferences for Livable Residential Area in Finland |
title_full_unstemmed |
Suburban Residents’ Preferences for Livable Residential Area in Finland |
title_sort |
suburban residents’ preferences for livable residential area in finland |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/9812c2d60f394144a40f2133461a840a |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT markkukarjalainen suburbanresidentspreferencesforlivableresidentialareainfinland AT huseyinemreilgın suburbanresidentspreferencesforlivableresidentialareainfinland AT laurimetsaranta suburbanresidentspreferencesforlivableresidentialareainfinland AT markkunorvasuo suburbanresidentspreferencesforlivableresidentialareainfinland |
_version_ |
1718431482377142272 |