Feasibility, safety, and acceptability of a remotely monitored exercise pilot CHAMP: A Clinical trial of High‐intensity Aerobic and resistance exercise for Metastatic castrate‐resistant Prostate cancer

Abstract Background Exercise may improve clinical and quality of life outcomes for men with prostate cancer. No randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the feasibility, safety, and acceptability of remote exercise training in men with metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)....

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stacey A. Kenfield, Erin L. Van Blarigan, Neil Panchal, Alexander Bang, Li Zhang, Rebecca E. Graff, Yea‐Hung Chen, Charles J. Ryan, Anthony Luke, Robert U. Newton, Imelda Tenggara, Brooke Schultz, Elizabeth Wang, Emil Lavaki, Kyle Zuniga, Nicole Pinto, Hala Borno, Rahul Aggarwal, Terence Friedlander, Vadim S. Koshkin, Andrea Harzstark, Eric Small, June M. Chan
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/982224bbcd1e4eb59b14dd6c2b73ea74
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:982224bbcd1e4eb59b14dd6c2b73ea74
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:982224bbcd1e4eb59b14dd6c2b73ea742021-11-22T09:08:48ZFeasibility, safety, and acceptability of a remotely monitored exercise pilot CHAMP: A Clinical trial of High‐intensity Aerobic and resistance exercise for Metastatic castrate‐resistant Prostate cancer2045-763410.1002/cam4.4324https://doaj.org/article/982224bbcd1e4eb59b14dd6c2b73ea742021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4324https://doaj.org/toc/2045-7634Abstract Background Exercise may improve clinical and quality of life outcomes for men with prostate cancer. No randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the feasibility, safety, and acceptability of remote exercise training in men with metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods We conducted a pilot RCT (1:1:1 aerobic or resistance exercise 3x/week or usual care) to determine the feasibility, safety, and acceptability of remotely monitored exercise over 12 weeks in 25 men with mCRPC. A prescribed exercise program was based on baseline testing including high‐ and moderate‐intensity aerobic exercise or resistance exercise completed at a local exercise facility. Feasibility was based on attendance, adherence, and tolerance; safety on adverse events; and acceptability on participant interviews. Results Between March 2016 and March 2020, 25 patients were randomized (8 aerobic, 7 resistance, and 10 control). Twenty‐three men (82%) completed the 12‐week study. Men who completed the remote intervention attempted 90% and 96% of prescribed aerobic and resistance training sessions, respectively, and 86% and 88% of attempted sessions were completed as or more than prescribed. We observed changes in performance tests that corresponded with the exercise prescription. No safety concerns were identified. Ninety percent of participants interviewed were satisfied with the program and would recommend it to others. Conclusions Remotely monitored exercise training is feasible, safe, and acceptable in men with mCRPC; there was no difference in these outcomes by mode of exercise. Through this research, we provide direction and rationale for future studies of exercise and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.Stacey A. KenfieldErin L. Van BlariganNeil PanchalAlexander BangLi ZhangRebecca E. GraffYea‐Hung ChenCharles J. RyanAnthony LukeRobert U. NewtonImelda TenggaraBrooke SchultzElizabeth WangEmil LavakiKyle ZunigaNicole PintoHala BornoRahul AggarwalTerence FriedlanderVadim S. KoshkinAndrea HarzstarkEric SmallJune M. ChanWileyarticlebehavioral interventionphysical activityremotestrength trainingNeoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensRC254-282ENCancer Medicine, Vol 10, Iss 22, Pp 8058-8070 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic behavioral intervention
physical activity
remote
strength training
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
spellingShingle behavioral intervention
physical activity
remote
strength training
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
Stacey A. Kenfield
Erin L. Van Blarigan
Neil Panchal
Alexander Bang
Li Zhang
Rebecca E. Graff
Yea‐Hung Chen
Charles J. Ryan
Anthony Luke
Robert U. Newton
Imelda Tenggara
Brooke Schultz
Elizabeth Wang
Emil Lavaki
Kyle Zuniga
Nicole Pinto
Hala Borno
Rahul Aggarwal
Terence Friedlander
Vadim S. Koshkin
Andrea Harzstark
Eric Small
June M. Chan
Feasibility, safety, and acceptability of a remotely monitored exercise pilot CHAMP: A Clinical trial of High‐intensity Aerobic and resistance exercise for Metastatic castrate‐resistant Prostate cancer
description Abstract Background Exercise may improve clinical and quality of life outcomes for men with prostate cancer. No randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the feasibility, safety, and acceptability of remote exercise training in men with metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods We conducted a pilot RCT (1:1:1 aerobic or resistance exercise 3x/week or usual care) to determine the feasibility, safety, and acceptability of remotely monitored exercise over 12 weeks in 25 men with mCRPC. A prescribed exercise program was based on baseline testing including high‐ and moderate‐intensity aerobic exercise or resistance exercise completed at a local exercise facility. Feasibility was based on attendance, adherence, and tolerance; safety on adverse events; and acceptability on participant interviews. Results Between March 2016 and March 2020, 25 patients were randomized (8 aerobic, 7 resistance, and 10 control). Twenty‐three men (82%) completed the 12‐week study. Men who completed the remote intervention attempted 90% and 96% of prescribed aerobic and resistance training sessions, respectively, and 86% and 88% of attempted sessions were completed as or more than prescribed. We observed changes in performance tests that corresponded with the exercise prescription. No safety concerns were identified. Ninety percent of participants interviewed were satisfied with the program and would recommend it to others. Conclusions Remotely monitored exercise training is feasible, safe, and acceptable in men with mCRPC; there was no difference in these outcomes by mode of exercise. Through this research, we provide direction and rationale for future studies of exercise and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.
format article
author Stacey A. Kenfield
Erin L. Van Blarigan
Neil Panchal
Alexander Bang
Li Zhang
Rebecca E. Graff
Yea‐Hung Chen
Charles J. Ryan
Anthony Luke
Robert U. Newton
Imelda Tenggara
Brooke Schultz
Elizabeth Wang
Emil Lavaki
Kyle Zuniga
Nicole Pinto
Hala Borno
Rahul Aggarwal
Terence Friedlander
Vadim S. Koshkin
Andrea Harzstark
Eric Small
June M. Chan
author_facet Stacey A. Kenfield
Erin L. Van Blarigan
Neil Panchal
Alexander Bang
Li Zhang
Rebecca E. Graff
Yea‐Hung Chen
Charles J. Ryan
Anthony Luke
Robert U. Newton
Imelda Tenggara
Brooke Schultz
Elizabeth Wang
Emil Lavaki
Kyle Zuniga
Nicole Pinto
Hala Borno
Rahul Aggarwal
Terence Friedlander
Vadim S. Koshkin
Andrea Harzstark
Eric Small
June M. Chan
author_sort Stacey A. Kenfield
title Feasibility, safety, and acceptability of a remotely monitored exercise pilot CHAMP: A Clinical trial of High‐intensity Aerobic and resistance exercise for Metastatic castrate‐resistant Prostate cancer
title_short Feasibility, safety, and acceptability of a remotely monitored exercise pilot CHAMP: A Clinical trial of High‐intensity Aerobic and resistance exercise for Metastatic castrate‐resistant Prostate cancer
title_full Feasibility, safety, and acceptability of a remotely monitored exercise pilot CHAMP: A Clinical trial of High‐intensity Aerobic and resistance exercise for Metastatic castrate‐resistant Prostate cancer
title_fullStr Feasibility, safety, and acceptability of a remotely monitored exercise pilot CHAMP: A Clinical trial of High‐intensity Aerobic and resistance exercise for Metastatic castrate‐resistant Prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility, safety, and acceptability of a remotely monitored exercise pilot CHAMP: A Clinical trial of High‐intensity Aerobic and resistance exercise for Metastatic castrate‐resistant Prostate cancer
title_sort feasibility, safety, and acceptability of a remotely monitored exercise pilot champ: a clinical trial of high‐intensity aerobic and resistance exercise for metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/982224bbcd1e4eb59b14dd6c2b73ea74
work_keys_str_mv AT staceyakenfield feasibilitysafetyandacceptabilityofaremotelymonitoredexercisepilotchampaclinicaltrialofhighintensityaerobicandresistanceexerciseformetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT erinlvanblarigan feasibilitysafetyandacceptabilityofaremotelymonitoredexercisepilotchampaclinicaltrialofhighintensityaerobicandresistanceexerciseformetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT neilpanchal feasibilitysafetyandacceptabilityofaremotelymonitoredexercisepilotchampaclinicaltrialofhighintensityaerobicandresistanceexerciseformetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT alexanderbang feasibilitysafetyandacceptabilityofaremotelymonitoredexercisepilotchampaclinicaltrialofhighintensityaerobicandresistanceexerciseformetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT lizhang feasibilitysafetyandacceptabilityofaremotelymonitoredexercisepilotchampaclinicaltrialofhighintensityaerobicandresistanceexerciseformetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT rebeccaegraff feasibilitysafetyandacceptabilityofaremotelymonitoredexercisepilotchampaclinicaltrialofhighintensityaerobicandresistanceexerciseformetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT yeahungchen feasibilitysafetyandacceptabilityofaremotelymonitoredexercisepilotchampaclinicaltrialofhighintensityaerobicandresistanceexerciseformetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT charlesjryan feasibilitysafetyandacceptabilityofaremotelymonitoredexercisepilotchampaclinicaltrialofhighintensityaerobicandresistanceexerciseformetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT anthonyluke feasibilitysafetyandacceptabilityofaremotelymonitoredexercisepilotchampaclinicaltrialofhighintensityaerobicandresistanceexerciseformetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT robertunewton feasibilitysafetyandacceptabilityofaremotelymonitoredexercisepilotchampaclinicaltrialofhighintensityaerobicandresistanceexerciseformetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT imeldatenggara feasibilitysafetyandacceptabilityofaremotelymonitoredexercisepilotchampaclinicaltrialofhighintensityaerobicandresistanceexerciseformetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT brookeschultz feasibilitysafetyandacceptabilityofaremotelymonitoredexercisepilotchampaclinicaltrialofhighintensityaerobicandresistanceexerciseformetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT elizabethwang feasibilitysafetyandacceptabilityofaremotelymonitoredexercisepilotchampaclinicaltrialofhighintensityaerobicandresistanceexerciseformetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT emillavaki feasibilitysafetyandacceptabilityofaremotelymonitoredexercisepilotchampaclinicaltrialofhighintensityaerobicandresistanceexerciseformetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT kylezuniga feasibilitysafetyandacceptabilityofaremotelymonitoredexercisepilotchampaclinicaltrialofhighintensityaerobicandresistanceexerciseformetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT nicolepinto feasibilitysafetyandacceptabilityofaremotelymonitoredexercisepilotchampaclinicaltrialofhighintensityaerobicandresistanceexerciseformetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT halaborno feasibilitysafetyandacceptabilityofaremotelymonitoredexercisepilotchampaclinicaltrialofhighintensityaerobicandresistanceexerciseformetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT rahulaggarwal feasibilitysafetyandacceptabilityofaremotelymonitoredexercisepilotchampaclinicaltrialofhighintensityaerobicandresistanceexerciseformetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT terencefriedlander feasibilitysafetyandacceptabilityofaremotelymonitoredexercisepilotchampaclinicaltrialofhighintensityaerobicandresistanceexerciseformetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT vadimskoshkin feasibilitysafetyandacceptabilityofaremotelymonitoredexercisepilotchampaclinicaltrialofhighintensityaerobicandresistanceexerciseformetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT andreaharzstark feasibilitysafetyandacceptabilityofaremotelymonitoredexercisepilotchampaclinicaltrialofhighintensityaerobicandresistanceexerciseformetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT ericsmall feasibilitysafetyandacceptabilityofaremotelymonitoredexercisepilotchampaclinicaltrialofhighintensityaerobicandresistanceexerciseformetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT junemchan feasibilitysafetyandacceptabilityofaremotelymonitoredexercisepilotchampaclinicaltrialofhighintensityaerobicandresistanceexerciseformetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
_version_ 1718417810880724992