Social cognition in neuropsychiatric populations: a comparison of theory of mind in schizophrenia and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

Abstract Social cognition deficits are observed both in patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) and in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). This may be due to dysfunction of the amygdala network, which is a common feature of both diseases. In this study, SCZ (n = 48) or MTLE (n = 31) and he...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Łukasz Okruszek, Aleksandra Bala, Małgorzata Wordecha, Michał Jarkiewicz, Adam Wysokiński, Ewa Szczepocka, Aleksandra Piejka, Oliwia Zaborowska, Marta Szantroch, Andrzej Rysz, Andrzej Marchel
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/98352e2bc9674a20acd72b4ba19022bb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:98352e2bc9674a20acd72b4ba19022bb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:98352e2bc9674a20acd72b4ba19022bb2021-12-02T16:06:06ZSocial cognition in neuropsychiatric populations: a comparison of theory of mind in schizophrenia and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy10.1038/s41598-017-00565-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/98352e2bc9674a20acd72b4ba19022bb2017-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00565-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Social cognition deficits are observed both in patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) and in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). This may be due to dysfunction of the amygdala network, which is a common feature of both diseases. In this study, SCZ (n = 48) or MTLE (n = 31) and healthy controls (HC, n = 47) completed assessments of mentalising (Reading Mind in the Eyes Test, RMET) and basic cognitive processing, e.g., working memory, executive functions and psychomotor speed (Trail-Making Test B and Digit Symbol). SCZ were also assessed with the Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). We found that the RMET scores of the two clinical groups were similar (p > 0.05) and lower than in the HCs (SCZ: p < 0.05; MTLE: p < 0.001). In the next step, SCZ were split into two groups with respect to the level of symptoms. Analysis of the RMET scores revealed no differences between the HC (M = 25.7 ± 4.1) and POS-LO (M = 25.3 ± 4.8); both groups outperformed the POS-HI group (M = 21.3 ± 5.2) and the MTLE group (M = 20.8 ± 4.6). No differences were found for the median-split with regard to negative symptoms. In SCZ, the mind-reading deficit appears to be associated with the level of positive symptoms. Both POS-HI and MTLE patients present significant mentalising deficits compared to healthy controls.Łukasz OkruszekAleksandra BalaMałgorzata WordechaMichał JarkiewiczAdam WysokińskiEwa SzczepockaAleksandra PiejkaOliwia ZaborowskaMarta SzantrochAndrzej RyszAndrzej MarchelNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Łukasz Okruszek
Aleksandra Bala
Małgorzata Wordecha
Michał Jarkiewicz
Adam Wysokiński
Ewa Szczepocka
Aleksandra Piejka
Oliwia Zaborowska
Marta Szantroch
Andrzej Rysz
Andrzej Marchel
Social cognition in neuropsychiatric populations: a comparison of theory of mind in schizophrenia and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy
description Abstract Social cognition deficits are observed both in patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) and in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). This may be due to dysfunction of the amygdala network, which is a common feature of both diseases. In this study, SCZ (n = 48) or MTLE (n = 31) and healthy controls (HC, n = 47) completed assessments of mentalising (Reading Mind in the Eyes Test, RMET) and basic cognitive processing, e.g., working memory, executive functions and psychomotor speed (Trail-Making Test B and Digit Symbol). SCZ were also assessed with the Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). We found that the RMET scores of the two clinical groups were similar (p > 0.05) and lower than in the HCs (SCZ: p < 0.05; MTLE: p < 0.001). In the next step, SCZ were split into two groups with respect to the level of symptoms. Analysis of the RMET scores revealed no differences between the HC (M = 25.7 ± 4.1) and POS-LO (M = 25.3 ± 4.8); both groups outperformed the POS-HI group (M = 21.3 ± 5.2) and the MTLE group (M = 20.8 ± 4.6). No differences were found for the median-split with regard to negative symptoms. In SCZ, the mind-reading deficit appears to be associated with the level of positive symptoms. Both POS-HI and MTLE patients present significant mentalising deficits compared to healthy controls.
format article
author Łukasz Okruszek
Aleksandra Bala
Małgorzata Wordecha
Michał Jarkiewicz
Adam Wysokiński
Ewa Szczepocka
Aleksandra Piejka
Oliwia Zaborowska
Marta Szantroch
Andrzej Rysz
Andrzej Marchel
author_facet Łukasz Okruszek
Aleksandra Bala
Małgorzata Wordecha
Michał Jarkiewicz
Adam Wysokiński
Ewa Szczepocka
Aleksandra Piejka
Oliwia Zaborowska
Marta Szantroch
Andrzej Rysz
Andrzej Marchel
author_sort Łukasz Okruszek
title Social cognition in neuropsychiatric populations: a comparison of theory of mind in schizophrenia and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy
title_short Social cognition in neuropsychiatric populations: a comparison of theory of mind in schizophrenia and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy
title_full Social cognition in neuropsychiatric populations: a comparison of theory of mind in schizophrenia and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy
title_fullStr Social cognition in neuropsychiatric populations: a comparison of theory of mind in schizophrenia and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy
title_full_unstemmed Social cognition in neuropsychiatric populations: a comparison of theory of mind in schizophrenia and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy
title_sort social cognition in neuropsychiatric populations: a comparison of theory of mind in schizophrenia and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/98352e2bc9674a20acd72b4ba19022bb
work_keys_str_mv AT łukaszokruszek socialcognitioninneuropsychiatricpopulationsacomparisonoftheoryofmindinschizophreniaandmesialtemporallobeepilepsy
AT aleksandrabala socialcognitioninneuropsychiatricpopulationsacomparisonoftheoryofmindinschizophreniaandmesialtemporallobeepilepsy
AT małgorzatawordecha socialcognitioninneuropsychiatricpopulationsacomparisonoftheoryofmindinschizophreniaandmesialtemporallobeepilepsy
AT michałjarkiewicz socialcognitioninneuropsychiatricpopulationsacomparisonoftheoryofmindinschizophreniaandmesialtemporallobeepilepsy
AT adamwysokinski socialcognitioninneuropsychiatricpopulationsacomparisonoftheoryofmindinschizophreniaandmesialtemporallobeepilepsy
AT ewaszczepocka socialcognitioninneuropsychiatricpopulationsacomparisonoftheoryofmindinschizophreniaandmesialtemporallobeepilepsy
AT aleksandrapiejka socialcognitioninneuropsychiatricpopulationsacomparisonoftheoryofmindinschizophreniaandmesialtemporallobeepilepsy
AT oliwiazaborowska socialcognitioninneuropsychiatricpopulationsacomparisonoftheoryofmindinschizophreniaandmesialtemporallobeepilepsy
AT martaszantroch socialcognitioninneuropsychiatricpopulationsacomparisonoftheoryofmindinschizophreniaandmesialtemporallobeepilepsy
AT andrzejrysz socialcognitioninneuropsychiatricpopulationsacomparisonoftheoryofmindinschizophreniaandmesialtemporallobeepilepsy
AT andrzejmarchel socialcognitioninneuropsychiatricpopulationsacomparisonoftheoryofmindinschizophreniaandmesialtemporallobeepilepsy
_version_ 1718385104489807872