Social cognition in neuropsychiatric populations: a comparison of theory of mind in schizophrenia and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy
Abstract Social cognition deficits are observed both in patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) and in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). This may be due to dysfunction of the amygdala network, which is a common feature of both diseases. In this study, SCZ (n = 48) or MTLE (n = 31) and he...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/98352e2bc9674a20acd72b4ba19022bb |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:98352e2bc9674a20acd72b4ba19022bb |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:98352e2bc9674a20acd72b4ba19022bb2021-12-02T16:06:06ZSocial cognition in neuropsychiatric populations: a comparison of theory of mind in schizophrenia and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy10.1038/s41598-017-00565-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/98352e2bc9674a20acd72b4ba19022bb2017-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00565-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Social cognition deficits are observed both in patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) and in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). This may be due to dysfunction of the amygdala network, which is a common feature of both diseases. In this study, SCZ (n = 48) or MTLE (n = 31) and healthy controls (HC, n = 47) completed assessments of mentalising (Reading Mind in the Eyes Test, RMET) and basic cognitive processing, e.g., working memory, executive functions and psychomotor speed (Trail-Making Test B and Digit Symbol). SCZ were also assessed with the Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). We found that the RMET scores of the two clinical groups were similar (p > 0.05) and lower than in the HCs (SCZ: p < 0.05; MTLE: p < 0.001). In the next step, SCZ were split into two groups with respect to the level of symptoms. Analysis of the RMET scores revealed no differences between the HC (M = 25.7 ± 4.1) and POS-LO (M = 25.3 ± 4.8); both groups outperformed the POS-HI group (M = 21.3 ± 5.2) and the MTLE group (M = 20.8 ± 4.6). No differences were found for the median-split with regard to negative symptoms. In SCZ, the mind-reading deficit appears to be associated with the level of positive symptoms. Both POS-HI and MTLE patients present significant mentalising deficits compared to healthy controls.Łukasz OkruszekAleksandra BalaMałgorzata WordechaMichał JarkiewiczAdam WysokińskiEwa SzczepockaAleksandra PiejkaOliwia ZaborowskaMarta SzantrochAndrzej RyszAndrzej MarchelNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2017) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Łukasz Okruszek Aleksandra Bala Małgorzata Wordecha Michał Jarkiewicz Adam Wysokiński Ewa Szczepocka Aleksandra Piejka Oliwia Zaborowska Marta Szantroch Andrzej Rysz Andrzej Marchel Social cognition in neuropsychiatric populations: a comparison of theory of mind in schizophrenia and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy |
description |
Abstract Social cognition deficits are observed both in patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) and in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). This may be due to dysfunction of the amygdala network, which is a common feature of both diseases. In this study, SCZ (n = 48) or MTLE (n = 31) and healthy controls (HC, n = 47) completed assessments of mentalising (Reading Mind in the Eyes Test, RMET) and basic cognitive processing, e.g., working memory, executive functions and psychomotor speed (Trail-Making Test B and Digit Symbol). SCZ were also assessed with the Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). We found that the RMET scores of the two clinical groups were similar (p > 0.05) and lower than in the HCs (SCZ: p < 0.05; MTLE: p < 0.001). In the next step, SCZ were split into two groups with respect to the level of symptoms. Analysis of the RMET scores revealed no differences between the HC (M = 25.7 ± 4.1) and POS-LO (M = 25.3 ± 4.8); both groups outperformed the POS-HI group (M = 21.3 ± 5.2) and the MTLE group (M = 20.8 ± 4.6). No differences were found for the median-split with regard to negative symptoms. In SCZ, the mind-reading deficit appears to be associated with the level of positive symptoms. Both POS-HI and MTLE patients present significant mentalising deficits compared to healthy controls. |
format |
article |
author |
Łukasz Okruszek Aleksandra Bala Małgorzata Wordecha Michał Jarkiewicz Adam Wysokiński Ewa Szczepocka Aleksandra Piejka Oliwia Zaborowska Marta Szantroch Andrzej Rysz Andrzej Marchel |
author_facet |
Łukasz Okruszek Aleksandra Bala Małgorzata Wordecha Michał Jarkiewicz Adam Wysokiński Ewa Szczepocka Aleksandra Piejka Oliwia Zaborowska Marta Szantroch Andrzej Rysz Andrzej Marchel |
author_sort |
Łukasz Okruszek |
title |
Social cognition in neuropsychiatric populations: a comparison of theory of mind in schizophrenia and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy |
title_short |
Social cognition in neuropsychiatric populations: a comparison of theory of mind in schizophrenia and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy |
title_full |
Social cognition in neuropsychiatric populations: a comparison of theory of mind in schizophrenia and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy |
title_fullStr |
Social cognition in neuropsychiatric populations: a comparison of theory of mind in schizophrenia and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Social cognition in neuropsychiatric populations: a comparison of theory of mind in schizophrenia and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy |
title_sort |
social cognition in neuropsychiatric populations: a comparison of theory of mind in schizophrenia and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/98352e2bc9674a20acd72b4ba19022bb |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT łukaszokruszek socialcognitioninneuropsychiatricpopulationsacomparisonoftheoryofmindinschizophreniaandmesialtemporallobeepilepsy AT aleksandrabala socialcognitioninneuropsychiatricpopulationsacomparisonoftheoryofmindinschizophreniaandmesialtemporallobeepilepsy AT małgorzatawordecha socialcognitioninneuropsychiatricpopulationsacomparisonoftheoryofmindinschizophreniaandmesialtemporallobeepilepsy AT michałjarkiewicz socialcognitioninneuropsychiatricpopulationsacomparisonoftheoryofmindinschizophreniaandmesialtemporallobeepilepsy AT adamwysokinski socialcognitioninneuropsychiatricpopulationsacomparisonoftheoryofmindinschizophreniaandmesialtemporallobeepilepsy AT ewaszczepocka socialcognitioninneuropsychiatricpopulationsacomparisonoftheoryofmindinschizophreniaandmesialtemporallobeepilepsy AT aleksandrapiejka socialcognitioninneuropsychiatricpopulationsacomparisonoftheoryofmindinschizophreniaandmesialtemporallobeepilepsy AT oliwiazaborowska socialcognitioninneuropsychiatricpopulationsacomparisonoftheoryofmindinschizophreniaandmesialtemporallobeepilepsy AT martaszantroch socialcognitioninneuropsychiatricpopulationsacomparisonoftheoryofmindinschizophreniaandmesialtemporallobeepilepsy AT andrzejrysz socialcognitioninneuropsychiatricpopulationsacomparisonoftheoryofmindinschizophreniaandmesialtemporallobeepilepsy AT andrzejmarchel socialcognitioninneuropsychiatricpopulationsacomparisonoftheoryofmindinschizophreniaandmesialtemporallobeepilepsy |
_version_ |
1718385104489807872 |