The Language of Archaeology II (or: How I survived the paradigm shift)

The Language of Archaeology II (or: How I survived the paradigm shift)

The paper is an auto-reflexive critical reconsideration of the author’s own previous writings on theory in archaeology. The imperfections of the early papers are scrutinized in connection to the prevailing attitude in the local disciplinary community at the time. Archaeology in Serbia has been withd...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Staša Babić
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
SR
Publicado: University of Belgrade 2016
Materias:
Anthropology
GN1-890
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9841856c4119419bbec4584e3334c2a5
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9841856c4119419bbec4584e3334c2a5
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9841856c4119419bbec4584e3334c2a52021-12-02T00:29:57ZThe Language of Archaeology II (or: How I survived the paradigm shift)0353-15892334-8801https://doaj.org/article/9841856c4119419bbec4584e3334c2a52016-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://eap-iea.org/novi-ojs/index.php/eap/article/view/246https://doaj.org/toc/0353-1589https://doaj.org/toc/2334-8801The paper is an auto-reflexive critical reconsideration of the author’s own previous writings on theory in archaeology. The imperfections of the early papers are scrutinized in connection to the prevailing attitude in the local disciplinary community at the time. Archaeology in Serbia has been withdrawn from the main theoretical discussions, and the individual attempts were aimed at compensating for this setback, introducing the essence of the current debates. Since the two major paradigms of the discipline – processual and post-processual, formulated in their original setting within the timespan of almost three decades, were presented simultaneously, they were merged in an unconsistent manner.Staša BabićUniversity of BelgradearticleAnthropologyGN1-890ENFRSREtnoantropološki Problemi, Vol 4, Iss 1 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
SR
topic Anthropology
GN1-890
spellingShingle Anthropology
GN1-890
Staša Babić
The Language of Archaeology II (or: How I survived the paradigm shift)
description The paper is an auto-reflexive critical reconsideration of the author’s own previous writings on theory in archaeology. The imperfections of the early papers are scrutinized in connection to the prevailing attitude in the local disciplinary community at the time. Archaeology in Serbia has been withdrawn from the main theoretical discussions, and the individual attempts were aimed at compensating for this setback, introducing the essence of the current debates. Since the two major paradigms of the discipline – processual and post-processual, formulated in their original setting within the timespan of almost three decades, were presented simultaneously, they were merged in an unconsistent manner.
format article
author Staša Babić
author_facet Staša Babić
author_sort Staša Babić
title The Language of Archaeology II (or: How I survived the paradigm shift)
title_short The Language of Archaeology II (or: How I survived the paradigm shift)
title_full The Language of Archaeology II (or: How I survived the paradigm shift)
title_fullStr The Language of Archaeology II (or: How I survived the paradigm shift)
title_full_unstemmed The Language of Archaeology II (or: How I survived the paradigm shift)
title_sort language of archaeology ii (or: how i survived the paradigm shift)
publisher University of Belgrade
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/9841856c4119419bbec4584e3334c2a5
work_keys_str_mv AT stasababic thelanguageofarchaeologyiiorhowisurvivedtheparadigmshift
AT stasababic languageofarchaeologyiiorhowisurvivedtheparadigmshift
_version_ 1718403692550422528

Ejemplares similares