Land-leasing behavior, local officials’ promotions, and Chinese cities’ debt risks

This study first analyzes how local governments’ land-leasing behaviors affect Chinese cities’ debt risk then examines the impact of officials’ promotion mechanisms on debt risk in China’s urban land bank system. The land-leasing behavior is reflected through three indicators, namely, land-leasing r...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lihua Zhang, Rui Han, Juanfeng Zhang, Lele Li, Danxia Zhang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9855235fe40b403897c8573d811eeb00
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9855235fe40b403897c8573d811eeb00
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9855235fe40b403897c8573d811eeb002021-11-23T13:51:26ZLand-leasing behavior, local officials’ promotions, and Chinese cities’ debt risks1648-715X1648-917910.3846/ijspm.2021.15654https://doaj.org/article/9855235fe40b403897c8573d811eeb002021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/IJSPM/article/view/15654https://doaj.org/toc/1648-715Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/1648-9179This study first analyzes how local governments’ land-leasing behaviors affect Chinese cities’ debt risk then examines the impact of officials’ promotion mechanisms on debt risk in China’s urban land bank system. The land-leasing behavior is reflected through three indicators, namely, land-leasing revenue, land-leasing scale, and land financial dependence level. Two new indicators are constructed to measure the local government’ debt risk from the perspective of debt scale and debt repayment: the debt scale risk and debt burden risk. Empirical analyses are based on the data of 281 prefecture-level cities from 2006–2015. The main findings are twofold. First, the debt scale risk is positively affected by the land-leasing revenue, and officials’ promotion pressure. The debt burden risk is positively affected by the land financial dependence and officials’ promotion pressure. Second, the officials’ promotion pressure significantly enhances the positive effect of land-leasing revenue on the debt scale risk. Local officials, who are under promotion pressure, are inclined to expand the size of urban investment bonds, which increases debt scale risk.Lihua ZhangRui HanJuanfeng ZhangLele LiDanxia ZhangVilnius Gediminas Technical Universityarticleland leasingurban investment bondsdebt riskofficials’ promotionchinaManagement. Industrial managementHD28-70FinanceHG1-9999ENInternational Journal of Strategic Property Management, Vol 25, Iss 6, Pp 485–496-485–496 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic land leasing
urban investment bonds
debt risk
officials’ promotion
china
Management. Industrial management
HD28-70
Finance
HG1-9999
spellingShingle land leasing
urban investment bonds
debt risk
officials’ promotion
china
Management. Industrial management
HD28-70
Finance
HG1-9999
Lihua Zhang
Rui Han
Juanfeng Zhang
Lele Li
Danxia Zhang
Land-leasing behavior, local officials’ promotions, and Chinese cities’ debt risks
description This study first analyzes how local governments’ land-leasing behaviors affect Chinese cities’ debt risk then examines the impact of officials’ promotion mechanisms on debt risk in China’s urban land bank system. The land-leasing behavior is reflected through three indicators, namely, land-leasing revenue, land-leasing scale, and land financial dependence level. Two new indicators are constructed to measure the local government’ debt risk from the perspective of debt scale and debt repayment: the debt scale risk and debt burden risk. Empirical analyses are based on the data of 281 prefecture-level cities from 2006–2015. The main findings are twofold. First, the debt scale risk is positively affected by the land-leasing revenue, and officials’ promotion pressure. The debt burden risk is positively affected by the land financial dependence and officials’ promotion pressure. Second, the officials’ promotion pressure significantly enhances the positive effect of land-leasing revenue on the debt scale risk. Local officials, who are under promotion pressure, are inclined to expand the size of urban investment bonds, which increases debt scale risk.
format article
author Lihua Zhang
Rui Han
Juanfeng Zhang
Lele Li
Danxia Zhang
author_facet Lihua Zhang
Rui Han
Juanfeng Zhang
Lele Li
Danxia Zhang
author_sort Lihua Zhang
title Land-leasing behavior, local officials’ promotions, and Chinese cities’ debt risks
title_short Land-leasing behavior, local officials’ promotions, and Chinese cities’ debt risks
title_full Land-leasing behavior, local officials’ promotions, and Chinese cities’ debt risks
title_fullStr Land-leasing behavior, local officials’ promotions, and Chinese cities’ debt risks
title_full_unstemmed Land-leasing behavior, local officials’ promotions, and Chinese cities’ debt risks
title_sort land-leasing behavior, local officials’ promotions, and chinese cities’ debt risks
publisher Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/9855235fe40b403897c8573d811eeb00
work_keys_str_mv AT lihuazhang landleasingbehaviorlocalofficialspromotionsandchinesecitiesdebtrisks
AT ruihan landleasingbehaviorlocalofficialspromotionsandchinesecitiesdebtrisks
AT juanfengzhang landleasingbehaviorlocalofficialspromotionsandchinesecitiesdebtrisks
AT leleli landleasingbehaviorlocalofficialspromotionsandchinesecitiesdebtrisks
AT danxiazhang landleasingbehaviorlocalofficialspromotionsandchinesecitiesdebtrisks
_version_ 1718416717595541504