One-year eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis in hyperopes

Christopher S Sáles, Edward E Manche Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA Background: To compare wavefront (WF)-guided and WF-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in hyperopes with respect to the parameters of safety, efficacy, predi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Sáles CS, Manche EE
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:	Ophthalmology RE1-994
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/987aa33d7a7f484481627d3d92c392fa
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:987aa33d7a7f484481627d3d92c392fa
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:987aa33d7a7f484481627d3d92c392fa2021-12-02T05:15:50ZOne-year eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis in hyperopes1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/987aa33d7a7f484481627d3d92c392fa2014-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/one-year-eye-to-eye-comparison-of-wavefront-guided-versus-wavefront-op-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483 Christopher S Sáles, Edward E Manche Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA Background: To compare wavefront (WF)-guided and WF-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in hyperopes with respect to the parameters of safety, efficacy, predictability, refractive error, uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and higher order aberrations. Methods: Twenty-two eyes of eleven participants with hyperopia with or without astigmatism were prospectively randomized to receive WF-guided LASIK with the VISX CustomVue S4 IR or WF-optimized LASIK with the WaveLight Allegretto Eye-Q 400 Hz. LASIK flaps were created using the 150-kHz IntraLase iFS. Evaluations included measurement of uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, <5% and <25% contrast sensitivity, and WF aberrometry. Patients also completed a questionnaire detailing symptoms on a quantitative grading scale. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for any of the variables studied after 12 months of follow-up (all P>0.05). Conclusion: This comparative case series of 11 subjects with hyperopia showed that WF-guided and WF-optimized LASIK had similar clinical outcomes at 12 months. Keywords: wavefront, hyperopic, LASIKSáles CSManche EEDove Medical PressarticleOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol 2014, Iss default, Pp 2229-2238 (2014)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Ophthalmology RE1-994
spellingShingle	Ophthalmology RE1-994 Sáles CS Manche EE One-year eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis in hyperopes
description	Christopher S Sáles, Edward E Manche Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA Background: To compare wavefront (WF)-guided and WF-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in hyperopes with respect to the parameters of safety, efficacy, predictability, refractive error, uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and higher order aberrations. Methods: Twenty-two eyes of eleven participants with hyperopia with or without astigmatism were prospectively randomized to receive WF-guided LASIK with the VISX CustomVue S4 IR or WF-optimized LASIK with the WaveLight Allegretto Eye-Q 400 Hz. LASIK flaps were created using the 150-kHz IntraLase iFS. Evaluations included measurement of uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, <5% and <25% contrast sensitivity, and WF aberrometry. Patients also completed a questionnaire detailing symptoms on a quantitative grading scale. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for any of the variables studied after 12 months of follow-up (all P>0.05). Conclusion: This comparative case series of 11 subjects with hyperopia showed that WF-guided and WF-optimized LASIK had similar clinical outcomes at 12 months. Keywords: wavefront, hyperopic, LASIK
format	article
author	Sáles CS Manche EE
author_facet	Sáles CS Manche EE
author_sort	Sáles CS
title	One-year eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis in hyperopes
title_short	One-year eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis in hyperopes
title_full	One-year eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis in hyperopes
title_fullStr	One-year eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis in hyperopes
title_full_unstemmed	One-year eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis in hyperopes
title_sort	one-year eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis in hyperopes
publisher	Dove Medical Press
publishDate	2014
url	https://doaj.org/article/987aa33d7a7f484481627d3d92c392fa
work_keys_str_mv	AT salescs oneyeareyetoeyecomparisonofwavefrontguidedversuswavefrontoptimizedlaserinsitukeratomileusisinhyperopes AT mancheee oneyeareyetoeyecomparisonofwavefrontguidedversuswavefrontoptimizedlaserinsitukeratomileusisinhyperopes
_version_	1718400485622284288

One-year eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis in hyperopes

Ejemplares similares