SEARCH FOR METHODS FOR SOLVING POLITICAL ISSUES IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS

This article highlights the most nodal contradictions taking place on the modern historical format between the political elites of Baku, Ankara and Yerevan. Passing the long history of diplomatic relations between Azerbaijan and Turkey, the author focused on the key issues of military doctrines and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hasan Siddik Karademir
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
RU
Publicado: Science and Innovation Center Publishing House 2017
Materias:
Law
K
H
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/98a92a23ef4a430b9652d5850c48b853
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:98a92a23ef4a430b9652d5850c48b853
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:98a92a23ef4a430b9652d5850c48b8532021-12-02T15:50:43ZSEARCH FOR METHODS FOR SOLVING POLITICAL ISSUES IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS2070-756810.12731/2070-7568-2017-2-80-87https://doaj.org/article/98a92a23ef4a430b9652d5850c48b8532017-06-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journal-s.org/index.php/nk/article/view/10004https://doaj.org/toc/2070-7568This article highlights the most nodal contradictions taking place on the modern historical format between the political elites of Baku, Ankara and Yerevan. Passing the long history of diplomatic relations between Azerbaijan and Turkey, the author focused on the key issues of military doctrines and the policy of non-interference in the affairs of other states. It was found out that Azerbaijan and Turkey are united by linguistic, ethnographic and geographical factors. In turn, these countries are looking for peace with Armenia, so as to successfully implement their own political line. Purpose – to show some ways and methods of a constructive peace strategy, mutual understanding and cooperation between Turkey, Azerbaijan and Armenia. Methodology. The research is based on the method of comparative-historical analysis with elements of the author’s comment is laid. Results. Ideological differences in the political interests and priorities of Turkey, Azerbaijan and Armenia, a number of difficulties arising on the winding path in the relations of the leaders of the Transcaucasian republics, should not shake the strategic partnership of these countries. There is no alternative to peace and mutually beneficial cooperation Practical implications. The results of the study can be used in the educational process to prepare for lectures and seminars on international relations.Hasan Siddik KarademirScience and Innovation Center Publishing Housearticleармяно-турецкие отношенияазербайджано-­турецкие связиполитическая стратегиявнешнеполитические ориентирыНагорно-Карабахский конфликтLawKSocial SciencesHENRUНаука Красноярья, Vol 6, Iss 2, Pp 80-87 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
RU
topic армяно-турецкие отношения
азербайджано-­турецкие связи
политическая стратегия
внешнеполитические ориентиры
Нагорно-Карабахский конфликт
Law
K
Social Sciences
H
spellingShingle армяно-турецкие отношения
азербайджано-­турецкие связи
политическая стратегия
внешнеполитические ориентиры
Нагорно-Карабахский конфликт
Law
K
Social Sciences
H
Hasan Siddik Karademir
SEARCH FOR METHODS FOR SOLVING POLITICAL ISSUES IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS
description This article highlights the most nodal contradictions taking place on the modern historical format between the political elites of Baku, Ankara and Yerevan. Passing the long history of diplomatic relations between Azerbaijan and Turkey, the author focused on the key issues of military doctrines and the policy of non-interference in the affairs of other states. It was found out that Azerbaijan and Turkey are united by linguistic, ethnographic and geographical factors. In turn, these countries are looking for peace with Armenia, so as to successfully implement their own political line. Purpose – to show some ways and methods of a constructive peace strategy, mutual understanding and cooperation between Turkey, Azerbaijan and Armenia. Methodology. The research is based on the method of comparative-historical analysis with elements of the author’s comment is laid. Results. Ideological differences in the political interests and priorities of Turkey, Azerbaijan and Armenia, a number of difficulties arising on the winding path in the relations of the leaders of the Transcaucasian republics, should not shake the strategic partnership of these countries. There is no alternative to peace and mutually beneficial cooperation Practical implications. The results of the study can be used in the educational process to prepare for lectures and seminars on international relations.
format article
author Hasan Siddik Karademir
author_facet Hasan Siddik Karademir
author_sort Hasan Siddik Karademir
title SEARCH FOR METHODS FOR SOLVING POLITICAL ISSUES IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS
title_short SEARCH FOR METHODS FOR SOLVING POLITICAL ISSUES IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS
title_full SEARCH FOR METHODS FOR SOLVING POLITICAL ISSUES IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS
title_fullStr SEARCH FOR METHODS FOR SOLVING POLITICAL ISSUES IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS
title_full_unstemmed SEARCH FOR METHODS FOR SOLVING POLITICAL ISSUES IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS
title_sort search for methods for solving political issues in the south caucasus
publisher Science and Innovation Center Publishing House
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/98a92a23ef4a430b9652d5850c48b853
work_keys_str_mv AT hasansiddikkarademir searchformethodsforsolvingpoliticalissuesinthesouthcaucasus
_version_ 1718385648753180672